Register now to get rid of these ads!

Hot Rods Model A body on ‘32 chassis WITH FENDERS- Help!

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by RiffRaffRoadster, Dec 24, 2018.

  1. Gasolinefed
    Joined: Apr 17, 2018
    Posts: 105

    Gasolinefed
    Member
    from OR

    Keeping the rear bones?

    In a choice between split bones and ladder bars I think you want to go with the bars.. What allows them to work is a certain amount of axianal and longitudinal bar flex.. they almost act as another spring in the system when set up properly.. split bones are a heavy tube which resists this..

    But this is theoretical as every car I've built has run a 4 link so I don't have any real world testing to be certain.. maybe someone more experienced can chime in on ladders vs bones..
     
    RiffRaffRoadster likes this.
  2. alchemy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 20,516

    alchemy
    Member

    My little brother has an A pickup with 36 rear wishbones on a 9” Ford rearend. He tied his together in the center with the yoke and ball from a front wishbone. He has been driving it for over a decade, including passes down the track at Mokan. No problems for him.
     
    Stogy, RiffRaffRoadster and Blues4U like this.
  3. Blues4U
    Joined: Oct 1, 2015
    Posts: 7,589

    Blues4U
    Member
    from So Cal

    Just getting caught up on this thread and wanted to say how nice it looks. Great job so far. Keep it going!
     
    Stogy, loudbang and RiffRaffRoadster like this.
  4. RiffRaffRoadster
    Joined: Dec 24, 2018
    Posts: 450

    RiffRaffRoadster
    Member

    I’d like to better understand how all of these different suspension parts articulate in real world driving. Are there any videos or animations that show this? I’ve heard a number of conflicting suggestions and just want to see different suspensions in action.


    Sent from my iPad using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
    Stogy likes this.
  5. SimonSez
    Joined: Jul 1, 2001
    Posts: 1,637

    SimonSez
    Member


    Check out this old post I did on the same subject from a few years ago which explains how to make a real simple model from a strip of cardboard so you can try it yourself.

    Once you go to the post, click on the diagram first, the text doesnt make sense without it.

    https://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum...to-the-frame-rails.240464/page-2#post-2563079
     
    Stogy and RiffRaffRoadster like this.
  6. Gasolinefed
    Joined: Apr 17, 2018
    Posts: 105

    Gasolinefed
    Member
    from OR

    Last edited: Mar 21, 2019
    RiffRaffRoadster likes this.
  7. Torkwrench
    Joined: Jan 28, 2005
    Posts: 2,713

    Torkwrench
    Member

    Since you're adding a Posi to your 55 - 56 axel, the axel shafts will need to be slightly shortened. This is required on 55 and 56 Chevy axel shafts. Since Posi-Traction rear differentials came out in 1957, the 57 - 64 axels do not need to be shortened.

    The attached photo is from a Chevrolet Technical Service Bulletin, that was sent out to Chevy dealers in 1957.

    Posi axel shafts.jpg
     
  8. RiffRaffRoadster
    Joined: Dec 24, 2018
    Posts: 450

    RiffRaffRoadster
    Member

    Tork - I'm pretty sure we have a '57 axle...
     
    loudbang and jimgoetz like this.
  9. Torkwrench
    Joined: Jan 28, 2005
    Posts: 2,713

    Torkwrench
    Member

    From the photos, it looks like it's a 55 or 56 axle. The axle retainers are 55 - 56. The 57 - 64 retainers are much shallower than the 55 - 56 retainers. For reference, here's a link to an Ebay ad that shows repro 57 - 64 retainers.

    https://www.ebay.com/itm/57-Chevy-R...621?_trksid=p2349526.m4383.l4275.c10#viTabs_0

    Also, it looks like your axle does not have a drain plug. 55 - 56 axles did not have drain plugs, while 57 - 64 axles, did have drain plugs. Again, for reference, here's a link for some 55 - 56 axle retainers. As mentioned, they are much deeper than the 57 - 64 retainers.

    https://www.ebay.com/itm/Chevy-1955...123648313747?_trksid=p2385738.m4383.l4275.c10

    The center section could be any year from 1955 to 1964. They will all interchange between all of the years. However, the pinion yoke looks to be 55 - 57. The 58 - 64 pinion yokes were heavier and stronger. Here's a link to the stronger style. Not sure why it's listed as for a 57, though. Perhaps, the 57 Vettes used the stronger yokes, while the 57 passenger cars used the lighter design????

    https://www.ebay.com/itm/Corvette-O...ft-Pinion-Yoke-Flange-1957-1964-/201366216384

    That's a NICE looking Posi unit. Looks to be a new one. If so, what brand?
     
    Last edited: Mar 22, 2019
  10. RiffRaffRoadster
    Joined: Dec 24, 2018
    Posts: 450

    RiffRaffRoadster
    Member

    I just tried it with a coffee stir stick and I think I get it...thanks.
     
    loudbang and Stogy like this.
  11. RiffRaffRoadster
    Joined: Dec 24, 2018
    Posts: 450

    RiffRaffRoadster
    Member

    Tork - I'll talk to Will, the builder about this. I know the engine and transmission were from a 1957 Chevy (serial number matched), so I assumed the rear axle was from the same 'donor' car.

    I don't know the brand of posi unit but i can find out...
     
    loudbang and Stogy like this.
  12. big duece
    Joined: Jul 28, 2008
    Posts: 6,830

    big duece
    Member
    from kansas

    There is a casting date on your drop out unit...

    Sent from my SM-G900P using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
    RiffRaffRoadster, loudbang and Stogy like this.
  13. big duece
    Joined: Jul 28, 2008
    Posts: 6,830

    big duece
    Member
    from kansas

    I wished I knew you need a locker, i am rebuilding a 3:55 unit now to resell.

    Sent from my SM-G900P using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
    RiffRaffRoadster, loudbang and Stogy like this.
  14. Tim
    Joined: Mar 2, 2001
    Posts: 17,209

    Tim
    Member
    from KCMO

    Very well could have been from the same car. I’m sure Henry wasn’t the only one using left overs from the previous model
     
    loudbang and Stogy like this.
  15. Dick Stevens
    Joined: Aug 7, 2012
    Posts: 3,716

    Dick Stevens
    Member

    Message sent
     
    Stogy likes this.
  16. Atwater Mike
    Joined: May 31, 2002
    Posts: 11,624

    Atwater Mike
    Member

    Your builder, 'Will', has relieved me of much worry, with his excellent solution of cross membering a previously 'compromised' chassis.
    My concern grew with some of the suggested (read: 'Recommended!') steps to salvation.
    Thank the gods of argon and better thinking, the chassis is now aesthetically and mechanically sound. (Whew!)
    The car's worth it. And, regarding the dropped headlight bar? That is available in polished stainless, SoCal has it. Just call them, and have them 'match' measurements, although yours should match up, (stock '32?) It's a 'bolt-on'...
     
  17. RDR
    Joined: May 30, 2009
    Posts: 1,489

    RDR
    Member

    Have enjoyed scanning through your thread, Riff.
    Haven't read every page, but am wondering if you have a Texas title or Texas license plates?
    Reason I'm asking is back in '85 when I bought a my '34 Ford pickup with a 283, iron glide, and '57 rear end..I was curious to find it's history. Oregon DMV at that time would sell you the vehicle title history for $11.00. Paid my 11 bucks and a few weeks later got a detailed list of owners back to 1959...Earlier years were not available due to a fire at the DMV in Salem...Oh well...I was about 4th down the list...Got me the farmers name and the kid who pulled it out of his field in '59 to build into the truck I had. His address was still the same in a town about 60 miles from me...I drove the pickup up to his house, he was out in the yard mowing...walked over and says, " Looks just about like when I built it, except it was green"..Had a fun B.S. time with an old rodder,not that much older, though.. Scan_0009.jpg
     
  18. RiffRaffRoadster
    Joined: Dec 24, 2018
    Posts: 450

    RiffRaffRoadster
    Member

    Thanks RDR. I have the title but have not gone to re-register or get plates yet. This one is kind of strange. The car’s title and plates show a re-registered TX VIN, and it matched what looked to be a more recent ‘scratched in’ VIN on the frame. However, once we blasted the frame, the original VIN became visible, so I’m not sure how to register it now. It’s a ‘32 frame and a Model A body. I’ll figure it out. Great story on finding one of the earlier owners. A well known hot rod builder in the area Keith Tardel told me he has a lead on the previous owner of my car and I’m waiting to hear back from him. Thanks again for your comments.


    Sent from my iPad using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
  19. RiffRaffRoadster
    Joined: Dec 24, 2018
    Posts: 450

    RiffRaffRoadster
    Member

    big duece likes this.
  20. RiffRaffRoadster
    Joined: Dec 24, 2018
    Posts: 450

    RiffRaffRoadster
    Member

  21. jimgoetz
    Joined: Sep 6, 2013
    Posts: 517

    jimgoetz
    Member

    I don't know anything about the system in Texas but I know if it was me in Ohio I wouldn't rock the boat. It was a Title from Texas and your going to plate it in Texas. I know in Ohio they wouldn't bat an eye. Same with Hagerty Ins. As long as you had a valid title and registration you would be good to go.
     
    Last edited: Mar 24, 2019
    Stogy, AmishMike and RiffRaffRoadster like this.
  22. Torkwrench
    Joined: Jan 28, 2005
    Posts: 2,713

    Torkwrench
    Member


    Might want to check these threads on the Tri-Five message board.

    https://www.trifive.com/forums/showpost.php?p=1708902&postcount=19

    https://www.trifive.com/forums/showthread.php?p=2201404#post2201404

    Tom Parsons, ( DZAUTO ), on Tri-Five, is VERY knowledgeable on 55 - 64 Chevy rear axles.
     
    loudbang, RiffRaffRoadster and Stogy like this.
  23. big duece
    Joined: Jul 28, 2008
    Posts: 6,830

    big duece
    Member
    from kansas

    There were two carriers in the 57-64 55p drop outs. 57-59 were bolted together with coarse thread RH threads, the 60-64 units were fine thread and LH threads. Also the "V" that the blocks lock into are different. The pic on the left is 57-59, on the right is 60-64. If the carrier has stayed with the pumpkin casting, you can just look at casting date.

    GM Posi V Angle 60-64 Left 4-Series - 57-59 Right 3-Series_zpstmba1dre (1).jpg img_3525_e7433777b0437c9710d07459edb46550ad765fdc.jpg
    For example, the cast date for this is L276; 12-27-56 If there is a "P" its was a posi, '57 posi had just an X in the casting. 58-64 had "P". The thin P was car only, and the thick "P" was used in Corvette and pass car.
     
    brEad, loudbang, Torkwrench and 3 others like this.
  24. Stogy
    Joined: Feb 10, 2007
    Posts: 26,348

    Stogy
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Hey @RiffRaffRoadster...here is one incredible talent...don't know if you have seen this build...just incredible...But main reason other than an ooooo & awe fest is the rear bones...check it out...;)

    First post is some visuals and second describes it...it is sort of like the crude photomods I did back a bit...

    https://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/threads/just-another-black-model-a.1122429/#post-12742041

    https://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/threads/just-another-black-model-a.1122429/page-4#post-12745521

    Glad things are rolling Riff...;)
     
    Last edited: Mar 25, 2019
  25. Stogy, I like those rear bones. Thanks for finding the Black Model A build

    Phil
     
    brEad, Stogy and loudbang like this.
  26. RiffRaffRoadster
    Joined: Dec 24, 2018
    Posts: 450

    RiffRaffRoadster
    Member

    Another decision point I could use help on (and sorry that I don’t know the proper terminology): I’d like to keep the rear split wishbones set up if possible, but angle them in toward mid-point of car based on feedback here for a better pivot point and to allow travel without binding. The problem is the original rear split wishbones were built with a bend or curve so that the main part of the bar is straight and parallel to the frame rails. We would have to heat/bend or cut/re-weld them to make them straight so we can connect them to the cross member towards the middle of the car. See photos. Will has suggested we go with another rear suspension option. Any suggestions?
    [​IMG][​IMG]


    Sent from my iPad using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
    jimgoetz and Stogy like this.
  27. Stogy
    Joined: Feb 10, 2007
    Posts: 26,348

    Stogy
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Does it look like they Pie Cut it heated and bent it and re-welded it? I'm not up on cutting and rewelding Bones but they do it to fronts all the time...They perhaps can be cut and have solid inserts placed inside do some plug welds and weld the joining area...I was wondering what they did there. Those more up on this will chime in. It's coming along there Riff...
     
    Last edited: Mar 27, 2019
    RiffRaffRoadster and jimgoetz like this.
  28. alchemy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 20,516

    alchemy
    Member

    If you can find a pair of original 35 or 36 rear bones they will not have that bend that someone put in yours. Sometimes they are expensive, but you might get lucky.
     
  29. Stogy
    Joined: Feb 10, 2007
    Posts: 26,348

    Stogy
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

  30. goldmountain
    Joined: Jun 12, 2016
    Posts: 4,472

    goldmountain

    Check out Iron Trap Garage's Sweet Heart Roadster build on YouTube. It is a '31 roadster hub of on deuce rails with '36 bones angled in the same way. Stupid spell Check can't spell HIBOY.

    Sent from my SM-T350 using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
    RiffRaffRoadster likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.