So I have a pre 26 T roadster with turtle deck, grill shell, fuel tank and headlights. And have a line on a TT truck frame. What should I do with it? Stuff my 60's style 289 in it and some slicks and steelies? Or my set of 35 wires and search for a banger for a TROG style racer? Opinions?
Well your location makes what I want to say moot. If it wee mine I would build it '60s style, but I am sure that my opinion will get overridden. Like the 289 idea real well though.
Bolth would be my sugestion 289 wire wheels and a closed hood you could have the looks and the driabilty of a v8
This is my 26 T (with earlier turtle deck), on an A frame with a flathead. These bodies fit an A frame really nice. If you had an A body, how would you build it? Do the same for the T. The T body on a stocker A chassis gets you on the road period-style really cheap, and a V8 of several flavors fits into the A frame real nicely too.
There really isn't much interest in TT chassis, unless there is a running T engine in it. Stone stock on the outside with 16 inch wires is a good look. Bob
@Squablow i really like your T. But I am thinking somewhat lower. And I won't bother with a flathead Ford. Dodge maybe but not a V8 Ford.
Thanks. My car sits pretty high on purpose, but you could get one a lot lower with a swept front and a step in the rear, which would still avoid channeling. Channeled T's have a great look but you sacrifice a lot of interior space which there isn't much of in a T to begin with, that's why I like the body on top. An early Dodge V8 would be a great choice and would fit nicely too.
first, take some pics of what you have and post here - have any pic of the style that you like for a T? keep your eyes out for something besides a TT frame or, maybe build one - lots of potential
No pics yet. Still scrounging parts. It is gong to get my wavy Plymouth axle and un split bones front and rear.
Is there any special consideration that makes people shun the TT frame? They look like a great platform to me...with modifications of course.
TT frame is a nice base to start with... Stronger then a A. I think the frame is 5" tall there are several cars here on the hamb using the TT frame
Here you go - whenever I take pictures it seems like the workshop is a tip.... The rear wishbone is split but pivots off a single rose joint. I have also added a Panhard Bar for better location as the shackle angle is not ideal;
I Would do a mix between the "Multy" Aldrich roadster and the Spaulding brother roadster. Model A wires, double dipped axle, parallel front springs, straight six Stovebolt, 3 Weber, split fentons, long and painted hood top, TT frame, with those Multy hang up and the rear, model T rear spring and a belly pan and hood panels in Alu. That's what I would do. And that is what you could do, the rest is up to you.
A friend of mine had a TT frame hanging from the rafters in his shop. I thought it was an IDEAL platform to start a build on! Thick steel formed into a nice C rail...and deep too. If I ever came across one I would definately grab it.
Suggest you look at some books featuring "roaring roadsters", the real dirt track racers of the late '40s and early '50s for ideas. These cars were stunningly proportioned and fitted with just about every power plant you can imagine - except a small block Ford which in my opinion would be a very bad choice for a number of real-world reasons. There were two Tex Smith publications which would be a good start for your research. Here's just one example of what's possible...
Track roadsters make me wanna puke. Especially with that stupid looking Austin grill. The 50s was a horrible era for Ts. I really like the Aldrich T. It has the right look. It is simple. And has a healthy race car vibe. Probably the direction I will end up going. It is either that or a 70s vibe, green metalflake, slicks and lots of Chrome.
I built this frame using TT frame rails with shortened Model A crossmembers. It's the width of a T frame at the front and a few inches wider at the rear. I wanted the TT frame rails for their extra length and beefiness. I did bob a few inches off the front of the rails and added an X to prevent any twisting.
Here is some nice stuff; http://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/threads/three-springer-3-springer-picture-thread.583579/ But I still say that a TT frame is still good steel, and should be very build-able.
Wow , that hurt Matt. OK, picked myself up off the floor, ready to chime in. I like the TT frame idea, think it would work well. I know your partial to Dodge 6's, nothing wrong with that, even though you have/had that Ford flattie. I'm not big on the 289 idea, too close to a SBC. Get your engine choice narrowed down to a family, set your wheelbase/ engine placement accordingly and go from there. I have an A front and rear cmbr if that helps.
As much as it ruffles feathers my opinion on Ford flatties is based on tearing down dozens of the to find enough good parts to build one only to find it needed several thousand dollars worth of parts to make as less power than a stock 300 six. I would like a banger but it would need to be something other than the Babbitt bearing boat anchors Ford put in these cars to start with. I am pondering the use of an insert bearing tractor engine with lots of cheap mods and simple speed parts.
Hmm seriously thinking of a willys flathead or F head four for this. Should be easy to come by and more power than a T or A engine.
TT Frame and a flathead would be my vote if you wanna try and run TROG with it. You can always drop something else in down the line.
Or maybe I Ford 8N or a Mutt engine with a small blower and a good synchroed 4 speed. That would be cool. Unless you have a line on either one of the above.
That part is true for sure, I can understand that. And for the record, I think the TT frame rails could work nice if cut properly, to me it's way better than using new box tubing, just for looks. The Jeep/Willys 4 cylinder had some really cool speed parts made but they're super hard to find. If you could find some of that, a Willys 4 could be really neat in a T.