Register now to get rid of these ads!

Slow to load........... thought the HAMB was getting...

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by jeffrob, Mar 11, 2006.

  1. jeffrob
    Joined: Dec 20, 2005
    Posts: 279

    jeffrob
    Member

    a re-haul, Seems like the pages are slower to load than before!!???
     
  2. junkyardjeff
    Joined: Jul 23, 2005
    Posts: 8,596

    junkyardjeff
    Member

    I am having the same problem,dont make it harder on us that have dial up. Jeff
     
  3. jeffrob
    Joined: Dec 20, 2005
    Posts: 279

    jeffrob
    Member

    I am on high speed and it feels like i'm on dial up version 1.0
     
  4. Jim Marlett
    Joined: Aug 12, 2003
    Posts: 867

    Jim Marlett
    Member

    Blazing along for me. Must have been temporary.
     

  5. Ryan
    Joined: Jan 2, 1995
    Posts: 21,681

    Ryan
    ADMINISTRATOR
    Staff Member

    humm... it might be the quick reply functionality... Let me know if your performance changes...
     
  6. guiseart
    Joined: Apr 7, 2005
    Posts: 3,872

    guiseart
    Member

    Normal for me... zipping right along
     
  7. Boones
    Joined: Mar 4, 2001
    Posts: 9,691

    Boones
    Member
    from Kent, Wa
    1. Northwest HAMBers

    pages are loading decent, but the private message reply is slow (dial up speed), had to reload to try to reply, finally gave up and went to the main board
     
  8. sodbuster
    Joined: Oct 15, 2001
    Posts: 5,039

    sodbuster
    Member
    from Kansas

    Kinda' slow on my end also. I thought that it was just me.

    Also, Ryan if you read this when I go the "User CP" and click on it, it gives me random subscribed threads. I had two of them there today that were over two years old and it had this at the top of the page:

    ----

    Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /usercp.php(441) : eval()'d code on line 3

    Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /usercp.php(441) : eval()'d code on line 3
    -----

    Chris Nelson
     
  9. Primo
    Joined: Nov 7, 2004
    Posts: 425

    Primo
    Member

    Running fine for me but I'm getting the same error as sodbuster.

    Primo
     
  10. kentucky
    Joined: Jun 12, 2004
    Posts: 1,006

    kentucky
    Member

    Fine for me, I do like the quick reply though.
     
  11. blue57ford
    Joined: Jul 24, 2005
    Posts: 491

    blue57ford
    Member

    Working fine for me too. I too also like the quick reply.
     
  12. Ryan
    Joined: Jan 2, 1995
    Posts: 21,681

    Ryan
    ADMINISTRATOR
    Staff Member

    I love the quick reply... The only problem is that it causes the threads to open a little less snappy... I will continue to monitor. Hopefully, we won't have to get rid of the feature.
     
  13. jeffrob
    Joined: Dec 20, 2005
    Posts: 279

    jeffrob
    Member

    Ryan,

    seems better today, don't ditch the quick reply!

    may have been the computers at work..........
     
  14. HemiRambler
    Joined: Aug 26, 2005
    Posts: 4,208

    HemiRambler
    Member

    The quick reply is awesome - but it's now taking SEVERAL MINUTES to open a page - I usually lose interest before the page actually loads and just move on instead. I'm on dial up and it's NEVER been this slow before - not even remotely close. I can't take it.
     
  15. Ryan
    Joined: Jan 2, 1995
    Posts: 21,681

    Ryan
    ADMINISTRATOR
    Staff Member

    server performance hasn't dipped AT ALL today, so if you are having performance issues today, it is not on our end.

    That said, please keep me updated. I have a feeling that when traffic peaks on monday we might have to get rid of the quick reply feature...
     
  16. 49 Fastback
    Joined: Jun 24, 2005
    Posts: 500

    49 Fastback
    Member
    from Ohio

    I haven't had any problems loading, either at my PC at the office or here at home--and I have had problems with other sites. So I'm pretty sure Ryan's right and it's not on the HAMB end.

    Tucker
     
  17. Flat Ernie
    Joined: Jun 5, 2002
    Posts: 8,406

    Flat Ernie
    Tech Editor

    Love the quick reply, but, and I'm loathe to repeat it & sound like I'm whining, HAMB has been significantly slower w/version 6.0...has good days & bad, but overall, slower. Not sure why - could be on my end - but this is the only place that's slowed & it coincided with 6.0...while my statistics professor would tell you that correlation is not causation, the fact it's only the HAMB & only since 6.0 is too much of a coincidence for me...

    ...again, not complaining, merely an observation.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.