Register now to get rid of these ads!

October's 4 Banger Meeting,...now in session!

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by CoalTownKid, Oct 1, 2007.

  1. Sawracer
    Joined: Jul 6, 2006
    Posts: 1,315

    Sawracer
    Member
    from socal

    I just read the "secrets" article on that pulley, Remove the same weight off the flywheel to run it and make sure the engine is completely balanced or it won't do shit. Nice find you have there.
    OK more info = "winfield vibration neutralizer" SOSS V4.1 July 94 page 33. It appears there are four pieces that go to the assembly (appears you have them all!!) and G.Scott of Antique Auto parts has reproduced it. Old phone number but here goes 818 280 4546
     
  2. ebtm3
    Joined: May 23, 2007
    Posts: 837

    ebtm3
    Member

    Some intake heat makes a car much more drivable on the street. I have not tried to weld up a combo manifold with tube and a common plate for both intake and exhaust, but would not hesitate to do it if I needed one. Note that the stock Ford manifolds are supposed to touch one another, in the area above the carb. A lot more heat is transfered there, than would be with a "header" flange plate, because it would lose a little heat to the block.

    As to the damper that is located in , or on the, flywheel. IMO, any benefit in smoother operation from this has to be from increased flywheel mass, and that is damn little. Mostly, I think it in the mind of the guy who paid good money for it. Torsional vibration is the minute amount that the front end of the crank twists when the front most cylinders fire, and apply torque to the crank. The flywheel mass resists this for an instant, because of inertia, so the crank flexes. The front pulley acts as a small flywheel to give the front of the crank more mass, and absorb some of this twist, again, because of its inertia. The best arrangement would probably to have equal flywheel mass at each end of the crank, but space precludes this, In any event, a piece added to the flywheel end isn't going to help that I can see. Balancing flywheel and clutch assy. makes all the difference in the world.

    (happy Coaltown?)

    Herb
     
  3. Sawracer
    Joined: Jul 6, 2006
    Posts: 1,315

    Sawracer
    Member
    from socal

    Well you certainly " get it" . no sarcasm intended
     
  4. On manifold heat, most early engines had some method of heating the intake manifold. "A"'s and "B"'s had them bolted together, One way of increasing the noise or sound of dual exhaust on a flathead V8 was to plug the heats. My recent experience has been with a shop built Al. side draft manifold on an "A" Winfield flat head and a cast AL. manifold on my 2 port, in both cases the engines will stumble off the line unless water temp is 180 to 190. up to that point you can place your hand on the equalizer tube and it will feel cold, when it feels warm it is time to go. Both engine run Winfields.
    On vibration dampeners, there was a guy that ran a dual cam HAL and it would often shear the flywheel mounting bolts. He cured the problem by installing a SBC dampener as supplied by Vic King (Midnite Oil). I have had 2 cranks break at # 4 throw one with a chopped flywheel the second with a 12.5 lb Al flywheel, both were balanced to zero. This gets expensive so I now use a SBC unit adapted to the "A" "B" engines and this 2 port has many 4 grand passes. When the cylinder fires before TDC that throw tries to reverse direction, twisting the crank applying severe stress to the crank and the dampener dampens the shock or stress. This is not just theory but personal experience.
     
  5. Zig Zag Wanderer
    Joined: Jul 6, 2007
    Posts: 563

    Zig Zag Wanderer
    Member

    yep, Winfield was onto something there. i would suppose this became much more critical with his 2-up 2-down B engine he built. the stress would then move to the #2 main and with 2 cylinders rather than 1 trying to reverse direction the stress would be twice as great. any engineers care to chime in here?
     
  6. GARY?
    Joined: Aug 15, 2005
    Posts: 1,631

    GARY?
    Member

    "the engines will stumble off the line unless water temp is 180 to 190. "

    My current set up is a stock intake adapted to a single downdraft, minus the heat transfer plate thingy. Using the stock exhaust manifold. What you described is pretty much the case with my setup too.
     
  7. Vince CH
    Joined: Feb 17, 2007
    Posts: 17

    Vince CH
    Member

    hi
    you remember i tell you that my engine dont run perfect
    last day i change my two 81 in not so good condition with two 94 like new and y change the condensator from my distrib.
    i go make a run today and now the car drive realy good .
    i m happy
    cho vincent
     
  8. Artiki
    Joined: Feb 17, 2004
    Posts: 2,013

    Artiki
    Member
    from Brum...

    Are you selling the 81's then, Vince?
     
  9. CoalTownKid
    Joined: Mar 12, 2005
    Posts: 2,024

    CoalTownKid
    Member

    Guys,...

    Anyone have a manual on the Wico JEM magneto? Anyone know of any magneto repair guys?? I want to talk with someone about it,..and would like a manual.

    thanks....
     
  10. Sawracer
    Joined: Jul 6, 2006
    Posts: 1,315

    Sawracer
    Member
    from socal

    mainely magnetos is who I used. They have a site.
     
  11. Pulled the head of my old 14.9HP small bore engine - damn it's in good condition inside for a useless boat anchor.

    For those that have never seen this factory "speed part" here's a poor comparison shot with a stock head. Diificult to tell, but the chamber volume is smaller - notice the plug is buried deeper in the chamber as it's in the stock position on the outside. Perhaps when I get it cleaned up I'll take a better shot and measure the volume. Reckon I'll suck it and see and try it without flycutting to the larger bore. Fingers crossed the pistons don't meet it...

    [​IMG]
     
  12. This may sound like a dumb question but I am going to run twin 97's on my Winfield equipped banger and wondered what jet sizes I should run?
    I know, it should probably have twin 81's but I cant find any....

    Whats the original jet size on a 97 and an 81?

    Thanks
     
  13. Wildfire
    Joined: Apr 23, 2006
    Posts: 831

    Wildfire
    Member

    I had 49's or 50's put in my 94's for my banger. Since everything is still apart, I can't comment on how she runs, but this size was recommended by the carb guy and Brent - two experts in my opinion.
     
  14. Hope you have better luck with your head than I did with mine!
     
  15. Bruce Lancaster
    Joined: Oct 9, 2001
    Posts: 21,681

    Bruce Lancaster
    Member Emeritus

    Any of you know anything about the small-bore Model BF head?? I've heard at third hand that the AF head is a useful piece but that the BF can't be used on a B. I have no idea why that would be...anybody have one or know??
     
  16. Bigcheese327
    Joined: Sep 16, 2001
    Posts: 6,694

    Bigcheese327
    Member

    What's this "small bore" business? Are these tractor engines or something?

    -Dave
     
  17. Bruce Lancaster
    Joined: Oct 9, 2001
    Posts: 21,681

    Bruce Lancaster
    Member Emeritus

    These are Model A and Model B engines with a substantially smaller bore than regular USA types; They were offered in England and sold also on the comtinent because British tax was based on a "taxable HP" formula based on bore and number of cylinders...big bore engines moved into an area of tax cost that was difficult for many people to handle.
    Don't have numbers on bore and displacement handy--have GB parts books at home. They had of course small cylinder head volume and came with low rear gears and a hotter cam than big engines. Lots of pieces in there I'd love to see and play with...
     
  18. I had a BF engine - from what I recall it's something to do with the water galleries. There's a small hole between the cylinders on the AF head in my picture that isn't there on the A head. Possibly it's bigger on the BF head and pours water down the bore when fitted to a large bore engine Bruce?

    Any details on the hotter AF cam? How does it compare with a B cam?
     
  19. Bruce Lancaster
    Joined: Oct 9, 2001
    Posts: 21,681

    Bruce Lancaster
    Member Emeritus

    The holes may well be the same mismatch that makes a B gasket slightly different from an A...but I don't know, or have any actual clues on F motor cam timing. Just neat stuff I've read about or found in my catalogs and would like someday to get hold of for analysis...
     
  20. revkev6
    Joined: Jun 13, 2006
    Posts: 3,350

    revkev6
    Member
    from ma

    alrighty boys. question for yas! found a 1940-42 1/2 ton truck with the 4 banger in it. I know it's a N-series tractor engine they put in these trucks, but what was the transmission?? is it a standard v8 tranny or did it have a different gearset/bolt pattern?? any interesting speed equipment or bangers built off of this setup?? it's got insert bearings and replaceable sleeves stock.....
     
  21. kenagain
    Joined: Dec 15, 2005
    Posts: 820

    kenagain
    Member
    from so cal

    hey revkev6 on that banger eng in truck post a pic and try a model A bellhousing on the back of it who knows??
    Ken
     
  22. Bruce Lancaster
    Joined: Oct 9, 2001
    Posts: 21,681

    Bruce Lancaster
    Member Emeritus

    I'm looking at the N overhaul manual...it has a cast-on bellhousing much like a V8, quite possibly same circle, but the starter interrupts the circle on the left; it is about where it would be on an A_B engine. So--I'm betting on 85 type gears (even the 60 got those in 1940) and a special case. Do not have parts book here to verify.
     
  23. CoalTownKid
    Joined: Mar 12, 2005
    Posts: 2,024

    CoalTownKid
    Member

    Any banger guys running a Columbia II speed rear axle here?/ If so, what year,how do you like it, and what did you have to do to adapt it?? Thanks guys.
     
  24. davesville
    Joined: Dec 13, 2006
    Posts: 364

    davesville
    Member

    sounds interesting i agree with ken lets see it if you can
     
  25. ebtm3
    Joined: May 23, 2007
    Posts: 837

    ebtm3
    Member

     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.