Register now to get rid of these ads!

O/T..Need a little help from some of our photo nerd buddies!

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by LUX BLUE, Aug 17, 2008.

  1. LUX BLUE
    Joined: May 23, 2005
    Posts: 4,407

    LUX BLUE
    Alliance Vendor
    from AUSTIN,TX

    So. I realized today that I need a CAMERA that is worth a damn.
    I am looking for something digital, with the ability to focus on smallish junk. Picture clarity is important, too.

    Let's say I have 300 bucks to spend. (give or take.)

    What is a decent Unit? It would help if it could withstand being shot out of a cannon into the sun, or accidentally dropped into the grand canyon.
    ( yeah...me and fragile technology...not so much.)

    Thanks!
    Lux
     
  2. zman
    Joined: Apr 2, 2001
    Posts: 16,730

    zman
    Member
    from Garner, NC

    I pick up one of the Sony Cybershot's from Staple's, Best Buy, or the like every year or two. Less than $200 and pretty durable. I'm kind of hard on them as well... Got a DSC-W55 at this point. I think it was $160 or so....
     
  3. 54BOMB
    Joined: Oct 23, 2004
    Posts: 2,109

    54BOMB
    Member

  4. eric
    Joined: Jun 4, 2001
    Posts: 1,643

    eric
    Member

    i agree, i have a 10 mega pixel sony cyber shot SONY DSC-N2 and i'm more than happy with it!! pretty versatile, and easy to use. i use it regularly and its already payed for itself, i bought it for $400 new but they have come down in price.
    here's a few examples of the quality you get...
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     

  5. DocWatson
    Joined: Mar 24, 2006
    Posts: 10,280

    DocWatson
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Nikon, there is no substitute!
     
  6. zibo
    Joined: Mar 17, 2002
    Posts: 2,361

    zibo
    Member
    from dago ca

    Just go to your neighborhood camera/electonics store and shop.
    Some things to watch out for are...

    -rechargeable battery or AA style batteries - aa's get expensive, rechargeable lasts a good while but might be hard to recharge if your out.

    -of course megapixel size but you'll probably not need 2M size pics.

    -sometimes the too small cameras are hard to hold without putting finger in front of lens

    -some newer cameras don't have an old style viewfinder, so if it breaks its hard to focus right.

    -Just like anything, holding a camera you'll feel the quality of the buttons/on-off switch etc.

    -the size of the screen-big ones suck more juice but are easier to see.

    -there'll be a focus ratio both digital and actual lens...

    -price out the larger memory chips, they get expensive but are worth it.

    Unless you're taking mag pics anything under $300 will be very competitive.

    TP
     
    Last edited: Aug 17, 2008
  7. cuznbrucie
    Joined: May 1, 2005
    Posts: 2,567

    cuznbrucie
    Member

    Read Digital Photography review online......has reviews and recommendations that are authoritative and presumably unbiased........not just someone's preference........go here:

    http://www.dpreview.com

    CB
     
  8. stuart in mn
    Joined: Nov 22, 2007
    Posts: 2,414

    stuart in mn
    Member

    I have a Canon Elph I like very much. It's a point and shoot so it's not going to take as good a picture as a high end SLR, but it does a good job for the price. It's small (almost exactly the size of a pack of cigarettes) so it's easy to carry around in my pocket, and it's pretty durable. I keep it in the glove box of my car so it's always handy. It uses a specific rechargable battery that's about the size of a book of matches, but it holds a charge for a long time and it's easy to keep a spare battery in my pocket if I know I'm going to be taking hundreds of photos.

    If you're just going to use it for viewing snapshots on your computer screen, sending photos of the kids to Grandma, or posting pictures here on the board you really don't need one with super high resolution - one with 3 or 4 megapixels is probably more than enough for that. Also, optical zoom is good but digital zoom isn't very useful - it just makes your pictures grainier.
     
  9. JohnEvans
    Joined: Apr 13, 2008
    Posts: 4,883

    JohnEvans
    Member
    from Phoenix AZ

    +1 for AA bateries . Use rechargeable ones and if you are out and run out of charge you can get AA damm near anywhere to save the day. Have had a Fuji 2 meg for 6 years now and not 1 problem. Has a macro for close ups and both optical and digital zooms. On high res I have printed good 8X10s with a good printer.
     
  10. Pir8Darryl
    Joined: Jan 9, 2008
    Posts: 2,487

    Pir8Darryl
    Member

  11. LUX BLUE
    Joined: May 23, 2005
    Posts: 4,407

    LUX BLUE
    Alliance Vendor
    from AUSTIN,TX

    Hey fellas!
    Thanks for helping a meathead out. I think the Tz3 fits all the criteria pretty well...I always have something around here to share, but between my crappy computer and equally crappy camera, it gets tough to make it happen.
     
  12. Lot's of good ideas, I have one with a rechargeable battery and have learned to charge it every night before I go to a show (or whatever), also have one with AA batteries. I forget the extra batteries. Biggest thing I've found is too many megapixels makes it hard to upload pictures, takes a lot of time. Mine are both 5 megapixels, some places I can't post. One does have a way to shot with less than the 5 megapixels but I never learned how to do that.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.