Register now to get rid of these ads!

Mustang II front end tie rod question

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by paulmusiclover, Mar 3, 2011.

  1. paulmusiclover
    Joined: Oct 10, 2010
    Posts: 18

    paulmusiclover
    Member

    I have a 1940 Ford Deluxe convertible with a Mustang II front end (looks to be Ford original, has their logo) -- unfortunately, it seems the tie rods are too long (ie. they make the wheels "splay out" wider than they should. I can't tighten down the tie rod ends any further (no more thread).

    Are there different lenghts of tie rod ends for these, or different length of tie rod ends?

    Any help would be appreciated on this. My other option is to take of the tie rods and machine them to have longer threads, but if there's something off-the-shelf that would help, that would save me a lot of time, effort and likely money.

    Thanks HAMB'ers!

    Paul
     
  2. 76cam
    Joined: Sep 30, 2010
    Posts: 643

    76cam
    Member

    I dont no how close they are but youmight have a pinto front end insted of the mustang 2 you might see if pinto tie rod ends are diffrent.They do look alot alike.
     
  3. 53sled
    Joined: Jul 5, 2005
    Posts: 5,817

    53sled
    Member
    from KCMO

    toe out, would be the correct term. Do you have the stock lower arms with strut rods? Might be more contributing to it than tie rod length. too much camber, etc. hard to diagnose from here.
     
  4. alv
    Joined: Dec 23, 2007
    Posts: 597

    alv
    Member
    from jackson,NJ

    if you only need a small amount you could cut a little 1/4" off the threads of the inner tierod and also cut off about 1/4" of the outer tie rods.
     
  5. George/Maine
    Joined: Jan 6, 2011
    Posts: 949

    George/Maine
    Member

    They have the stock one should fit right and they have longer ones for the afther market MII wider frontend.There is another thing may not be your problem but some kits have shorter lower controll arms and they want to be cut off on rack threads.
     
  6. micky69
    Joined: Dec 24, 2010
    Posts: 288

    micky69
    Member
    from Ohio

    The standard must II tie rod end is 3.5 from zerk to end. Sometimes you will need to trim the inner down. There are also 5" and 6" long tie rods available if you need longer.
     
  7. the-rodster
    Joined: Jul 2, 2003
    Posts: 6,959

    the-rodster
    Member

    You may have a tbird rack, and associated tie rod ends, the rack fits, but the tie rods are longer.

    Rich
     
  8. 26 roadster
    Joined: Apr 21, 2008
    Posts: 2,020

    26 roadster
    Member

    they are the same
     
  9. paulmusiclover
    Joined: Oct 10, 2010
    Posts: 18

    paulmusiclover
    Member

    I'll take some additional pics tonight and post them so you guys can see... here's what I have already on my computer though...
     

    Attached Files:

  10. the-rodster
    Joined: Jul 2, 2003
    Posts: 6,959

    the-rodster
    Member

    Yup, that looks like the 5"

    3.5 should do the trick.

    Rich
     
  11. 53sled
    Joined: Jul 5, 2005
    Posts: 5,817

    53sled
    Member
    from KCMO

    is that lower control arm bushing missing, or is it the angle of the picture doing tricks.
    also looks like the right side has crazy negative camber. again, could just be the pic.
     
  12. Had this issue with my very first R&P on my '37. The vendor sent it with Granada TR ends which compared to the std. Mustang are quite a bit longer. Switch those to the smaller Mustang and you should have solved your issue. Walt
     
  13. George/Maine
    Joined: Jan 6, 2011
    Posts: 949

    George/Maine
    Member

    That looks like a afther market not Ford in any way.
    I think you have shorten lower a frame.The tie rod end should be about 3 1/2 long.I have a Heights with a manual rack had the cut that side some thread off the rack threaded shaft.Best thing to do is find the middle if 3 and half turn lock to lock that would be 1 3/4 turns.Then see how it looks cut to fit.Your ps rack may have and extention.I would like to know if this car was ever driven with that front end.
     
  14. maniac
    Joined: Jul 11, 2005
    Posts: 539

    maniac
    Member


    It also looks like it was rubbing on the crossmember, and looks like the rear of the control arm is rubbing too.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.