Register now to get rid of these ads!

Hot Rods Ford Motor Mount Recommendation?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by RednekYoga, Apr 13, 2022.

  1. RednekYoga
    Joined: Feb 2, 2019
    Posts: 81

    RednekYoga

    Howdy HAMB-ers,
    I put a 289 in my 63 Comet, stock motor mounts, stock exhaust manifolds. Runs great, but the driver side exhaust manifold touches the steering box creating a little knock that can be felt through the firewall and the steering wheel. I tried to loosen the motor/tranny mounts and move the motor over, but the passenger side mount is already moved as far to the passenger side as possible.
    Anyone recommend a mount that has some adjustability? Any other recommendations?
    Thanks all!
    RNY
     
  2. FrozenMerc
    Joined: Sep 4, 2009
    Posts: 3,103

    FrozenMerc
    Member

    Can you put some spacers between the mount and the motor to raise it up slightly? I had to do that on a 351W into '57 Ranchero swap I did a few years ago. Used some 3/4" long heavy wall steel bushings to raise the motor to gain a bit of extra steering clearance. Worked well.
     
    tommyd, Joe Travers and egads like this.
  3. Are the exhaust manifolds stock 289 or the original 260 ones? There are a few options- fabricate a spacer plate to go between the mount and the chassis, grind away the spot where the manifold hits the box, or use headers.
     
    Joe Travers likes this.
  4. Joe Travers
    Joined: Mar 21, 2021
    Posts: 708

    Joe Travers
    Member
    from Louisiana

    ^^^ X 2

    Comet driver-side manifold is different than other models. Use the original 260 manifold if you have it. Spacers will work if you are running auto transmission, may wonk up Z-bar alignment. No one makes OTC headers that fit well (that I know) w/o some hammer work.

    Nice ragtop, BTW :)

    Joe
     

  5. RednekYoga
    Joined: Feb 2, 2019
    Posts: 81

    RednekYoga

    Dang right, man! That's a good idea. Didn't even think about it.
     
  6. RednekYoga
    Joined: Feb 2, 2019
    Posts: 81

    RednekYoga

    Thanks, Joe - Yep, the original manifolds were done in. Trans is auto, so spacers it is. Thanks.
     
    Joe Travers likes this.
  7. RednekYoga
    Joined: Feb 2, 2019
    Posts: 81

    RednekYoga

    Thanks for the response, sir! So grind away how much do you think? I'll try the spacer thing first and see what happens.
     
  8. RednekYoga
    Joined: Feb 2, 2019
    Posts: 81

    RednekYoga

    BTW...I'd rather have your hardtop than my vert!
     
  9. Joe Travers
    Joined: Mar 21, 2021
    Posts: 708

    Joe Travers
    Member
    from Louisiana

    Rains too much down here for verts but I dig riding in 'em ;)

    Joe
     
  10. I would not grind away more than 1/16", and taper the grind to avoid a hot spot. As you said, spacers first.
     
  11. fordor41
    Joined: Jul 2, 2008
    Posts: 1,018

    fordor41
    Member

    Find a rear dump D.S manifold. mustang or maybe van. that's how I solved the problem on my '41 ford. was a 302 but I believe 289/302 will fit. first time I milled the manifold matting surface at an angle, but it still touched a bit. second time I found 2 identical manifolds and cut them in sections, shuffled them around,welded them together so dump was in the rear but they tended to crack. found a D.S. rear dump and that solved the problem for good (Mustang I believe).. check bolt patterns because some are different, straight and angled.
     
    Last edited: Apr 13, 2022
  12. RednekYoga
    Joined: Feb 2, 2019
    Posts: 81

    RednekYoga

    Hey gents. The plot thickens... Yesterday I pulled off the manifold on the driver's side and ground off the tiny spot that was resting on the steering box, looks like plenty of clearance now which is awesome. BUT...when I put it all back together, I realized this is how the shop (that recently rewired the whole car) had the firing order set up (see pic).
    Any ideas as to why they might have set the firing order like this? It was running pretty darn good as far as I can tell...so how could it run alright with this setup?
    Thanks y'all!
    wrong firing order.jpg
     
  13. Looks like you have the distributor mismarked.

    Here's the proper firing order:


    ford-260-289-302-firing-order.jpeg
     
  14. Joe Travers
    Joined: Mar 21, 2021
    Posts: 708

    Joe Travers
    Member
    from Louisiana

    ^^^ X 2

    The wire routing you drew is correct for 289 (1-5-4-2-6-3-7-8). 351W distributor cap interchanges w/ 289 but has different firing order (1-3-5-7-2-6-5-4-8). You're good.

    Joe
     
    Last edited: Apr 14, 2022
  15. RednekYoga
    Joined: Feb 2, 2019
    Posts: 81

    RednekYoga

    Awesome...thanks y'all!
     
  16. THE FRENCHTOWN FLYER
    Joined: Jun 6, 2007
    Posts: 5,421

    THE FRENCHTOWN FLYER
    Member
    from FRENCHTOWN

    You (they) didn't install a late 5.0 HO cam with the other firing order?
     
  17. THE FRENCHTOWN FLYER
    Joined: Jun 6, 2007
    Posts: 5,421

    THE FRENCHTOWN FLYER
    Member
    from FRENCHTOWN

    ???
     
  18. Joe Travers
    Joined: Mar 21, 2021
    Posts: 708

    Joe Travers
    Member
    from Louisiana

    Typo, thanks Frenchy.

    Joe
     
  19. BamaMav
    Joined: Jun 19, 2011
    Posts: 6,761

    BamaMav
    Member
    from Berry, AL

    I'm not that familiar with the Comet steering box location, but have you looked at an Explorer manifold? That's what I used on my Lincoln with the 302 transplant. The first two ports go up and back, and drop at the third port, the fourth port drops straight down and connects to the first three and exits down and slightly toward the oil pan. I had to use them because my steering box was right at the motor mount, and they had to run high to clear it. But if the box is right at the firewall, they probably won't help.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.