Register now to get rid of these ads!

Projects fit the frame to the body , or the body to the frame ?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by jbon64, Feb 15, 2016.

  1. oj
    Joined: Jul 27, 2008
    Posts: 6,459

    oj
    Member

    Did Brookville put nutserts in the frame for your Model 'A' cowl bolts? I believe they are seperate from the subframe. Drop those bolts in place and see if things begin to make sense.
     
  2. jbon64
    Joined: Jul 26, 2006
    Posts: 511

    jbon64
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    yep , same on the other side . i did take the bolts out at the firewall mount and slid the body forward about a half inch to at least line up the wheel well arch. the frame is still a half inch to wide at both sides.
     
  3. jbon64
    Joined: Jul 26, 2006
    Posts: 511

    jbon64
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    well i got a reply from brookville . they say my body needs to be "spread out " and listed all the stuff i could buy from them to replace my subframe. i asked for the measurements they use so i could compare to my frame . my gut tells me they may have fouled up my frame at some point . the mounting points seem to be shifted back a half inch . i slid the body forward a bit to line up the wheel well arch . still the frame looks to wide and the mounts are now off .
     
  4. jbon64
    Joined: Jul 26, 2006
    Posts: 511

    jbon64
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    yes , they installed the body mounts . they all line up OK . i put bolts in the farthest forward mounts at the firewall just to keep the body in place , but like i say , all the other mounts lined up .
     
  5. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 23,333

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Compare the provided measurements.

    Brookville builds these in a jig. If it is wrong, the jig is wrong.

    I have seen very few early Fords with correct dimensions after 85-ish years.
     
  6. Dino 64
    Joined: Jul 13, 2012
    Posts: 2,408

    Dino 64
    Member
    from Virginia

    OK, I have the same chassis so I took lots of measurements after work. A picture is worth....so chassis dimensions 002.JPG
     
  7. Dino 64
    Joined: Jul 13, 2012
    Posts: 2,408

    Dino 64
    Member
    from Virginia

    Sorry meant to post more. The first one is of the cowl area, furthest front mount, with close up of measurement. The other pic shows the measurements just in front of the wheel well where the offset was in your 2nd pic. Took other measurements as well. Width of the body at the back of the door appox 441/2, chassis at same point using body mount holes inboard from the door jambs is 44 3/16.. body reveal at cowl appox 32 7/8 wide..chassis width the same at approx same point. chassis dimensions 003.JPG chassis dimensions 011.JPG chassis dimensions 003.JPG chassis dimensions 011.JPG chassis dimensions 011.JPG chassis dimensions 003.JPG chassis dimensions 011.JPG chassis dimensions 011.JPG
     
  8. Dino 64
    Joined: Jul 13, 2012
    Posts: 2,408

    Dino 64
    Member
    from Virginia

    Sorry about the duplicates.
     
  9. jbon64
    Joined: Jul 26, 2006
    Posts: 511

    jbon64
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    thanks for those measurements dino . mine are same . i think my body is the issue . PM'd you as well .
     
  10. mike bowling
    Joined: Jan 1, 2013
    Posts: 3,560

    mike bowling
    Member

    I thought we were at the other end- yup, the problem with the '32 frame, or even a "kick" in the back of a stock frame- stock subrails are flat to fit the stock frame. Everything changes real quick ($$$$$)
     
  11. Happydaze
    Joined: Aug 21, 2009
    Posts: 1,933

    Happydaze
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Not necessarily! Dino hasn't tried to fit his body yet so is probably going to have the same problem as you. Plot thickens?

    Chris
     
  12. cretin
    Joined: Oct 10, 2006
    Posts: 3,066

    cretin
    Member

    Have you taken measurements off the body? Have you compared body mounting hole measurements on the body to the stock frame? Cross measurements to check for square?

    Stock frame measurements for reference.

    ImageUploadedByH.A.M.B.1455701535.210512.jpg
     
  13. clem
    Joined: Dec 20, 2006
    Posts: 4,220

    clem
    Member

    not sure if there is such a thing as standard when it comes to early Ford bodies. think 'averages' - as they were built in many different factories.
     
  14. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 23,333

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Given what I have seen, I am inclined to agree.
     
    hipster likes this.
  15. oj
    Joined: Jul 27, 2008
    Posts: 6,459

    oj
    Member

    Do you see the 2 tabs they have inside the frame? Those would be the cowl A pillar, I think from them to the outside of the body is less than 2". So if the cowl is bolted to those tabs the frame will be outside the body at that point.[​IMG]
     
  16. Doesn't matter who built the chassis you fit the chassis to the body always, the body has the shape that you are after not the chassis.
     
    hipster and clem like this.
  17. woodiewagon46
    Joined: Mar 14, 2013
    Posts: 2,277

    woodiewagon46
    Member
    from New York

    I can't believe that Brookville told you that your body has to be "spread out". When you spread the quarter panels you must modify your doors, subrails AND cowl. The door arc mimics the quarters and the doors are hinged to the cowl! If anything I would modify the chassis to fit the body. The first picture you posted shows what looks like a pretty nice body, don't mess it up. Hundreds of guys have put Model A's on Deuce rails and I have never heard of Brookville's solution.
     
    wex65 and lothiandon1940 like this.
  18. wex65
    Joined: Dec 19, 2012
    Posts: 1,119

    wex65
    Member
    from WV

    Got the coupe up in the air for some detailing so took some measurements. These are frame width from outside of rail to outside of rail.

    First measurement measurement was where the rear arch comes down to the frame, 41 1/2".

    Next is about 2" ahead of the cowl. Couldn't do it AT the cowl as the trans makes it awkward. A hair over 29" at this point.

    For my money the frame is too wide at the front also. Included shots of mine sitting on the 32 rails.
    IMG_2091.JPG IMG_2092.JPG IMG_2093.JPG IMG_2095.JPG
     
    Last edited: Feb 17, 2016
    lothiandon1940 likes this.
  19. oj
    Joined: Jul 27, 2008
    Posts: 6,459

    oj
    Member

    Paul, can you get a measurement of the cowl bolts to the outside of the body or are they covered? the ones at the hinge pillar. See the photo Dean provided for referance. Thanks, Oj
     
  20. wex65
    Joined: Dec 19, 2012
    Posts: 1,119

    wex65
    Member
    from WV

    It is @3 3/8" from the center of the bolts to the outsides of the body. This is the bolts that are directly underneath the hinge pillar.
     
  21. oj
    Joined: Jul 27, 2008
    Posts: 6,459

    oj
    Member

    Thanks, that is a relief as I was afraid it was much less.
     
  22. wex65
    Joined: Dec 19, 2012
    Posts: 1,119

    wex65
    Member
    from WV

    Bear in mind though that on my frame these bolts are in the middle of the rail, NOT inset.
     
  23. Dino 64
    Joined: Jul 13, 2012
    Posts: 2,408

    Dino 64
    Member
    from Virginia

    I'm surprised Paul's frame is much narrower in the cowl, but it would have to be if the mounting hole is in the middle of the rail. As far as the difference in the measurement before the wheel well, keep in mind Paul's is a custom chassis built by one of the best. Still, my body measurements put the frame a hair inboard of the body or flush to it. The OP pm me with an inch narrower measurement in body width than mine, so he figured it's the body.
    No, I haven't put the body on yet, but I think it will be OK. It won't overhang the frame as much, but again it's not a custom chassis either.
     
    wex65 likes this.
  24. clem
    Joined: Dec 20, 2006
    Posts: 4,220

    clem
    Member

    go with this !
     
  25. jbon64
    Joined: Jul 26, 2006
    Posts: 511

    jbon64
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    measurements on my frame are 44 1/2 at the wheel well cut out , 31 at the firewall mounting point. dino64 has 44 7/8 just forward of the wheel arch on his coupe body , where my coupe body is 43 7/8 . thanks for those numbers wex65 , loved the TRJ write up !!
     
    wex65 likes this.
  26. wex65
    Joined: Dec 19, 2012
    Posts: 1,119

    wex65
    Member
    from WV

    Happy to help. Shout if you need anything else.
     
  27. S.F.
    Joined: Oct 19, 2006
    Posts: 2,895

    S.F.
    Member

    Brookville Roadster subs out some of the frame building to two local Dayton hot rod shops. They are made by hand. Id verify the measurements with Brookville just to make sure.
     
    Last edited: Feb 18, 2016
  28. jbon64
    Joined: Jul 26, 2006
    Posts: 511

    jbon64
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    the guys at brookville sent me a file with all the measurements of their frame. everything jives . as another person posted ," brookville uses a jig" so nothing was done wrong on their end IMO. the frame i purchased was built extremely well . all the issues are with my coupe body .
     
  29. S.F.
    Joined: Oct 19, 2006
    Posts: 2,895

    S.F.
    Member

    Good deal....yep they use a jig...'mass produced by hand' ......wonder how the body got like that?
     
  30. mike bowling
    Joined: Jan 1, 2013
    Posts: 3,560

    mike bowling
    Member

    Body looks pretty good going by your earlier pictures.With the firewall in, and if the stock firewall "feet" aren't bent in, how can it be too narrow across the bottom?
    I just measured my'30 coupe, and at the very bottom of the cowl side panels, in the front, if you hook a tape on the little 3/16" return, it's 31 and 1/2" wide.
    Spreading the cowl is not the answer.

    I STILL think that new frame is set up wrong. (sorry)
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.