Register now to get rid of these ads!

Engine Offset, Any Side Effects/Problems?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by KernCountyKid, Sep 24, 2007.

  1. KernCountyKid
    Joined: Jul 11, 2006
    Posts: 376

    KernCountyKid
    Member
    from Arkansas

    I was having some clearance issues with my balancer and decided to build new taller engine mounts. I intended to offset it to the drivers side 3/8" because the fuel pump was closer to the frame than I liked. Somewhere between drilling and measuring I got a little lost and the offset ended up being closer to 3/4". Other than resetting the pinion angle because of the extra height, is there anything I need to change because of the offset?

    My main concern is that the transmission was bolted to the crossmember the whole time. Do I have to redrill the trans mount holes offset to the right, or is it ok to just let the trans pivot on the bolts at a slight angle? I hope that made sense...

    before...

    [​IMG]

    after...
    [​IMG]
     
  2. jonzcustomshop
    Joined: Jun 25, 2007
    Posts: 1,927

    jonzcustomshop
    Member

    when I built my rod, I centered the motor and rear in the frame, that is when I found out that gm had everything 3/4 to the right in the first place(my donor was a 77 pont. wagon) If your motor lines up with the rear now , i would redrill the tranny crossmember and straighten everything out.
    The stock car guys run w/ everything a little to the right all the time.
     
  3. time_xx
    Joined: Sep 16, 2007
    Posts: 161

    time_xx
    Member

    If I recall correctly, the drivetrain is not straight to avoid harmonics. Every GM that I can remember is like this. The engine is actually in the bay at a slight angle. BUT, I don't think I have ever heard of anyone having an issue with it being in line.
     
  4. KernCountyKid
    Joined: Jul 11, 2006
    Posts: 376

    KernCountyKid
    Member
    from Arkansas

    Well hows that for dumb luck? That makes me feel better. I am curious about one thing, the 3rd member isn't totally symetrical. The pinion is a little offset to the passenger side. So this means that the driveshaft isn't just angled vertically, but because the engine is offset to the drivers side it also has a little bit of angle on the horizontal plane.

    Even if the engine was centered, because the pinion is offset it would still have some horizontal angle. But I wonder if there is a maximum allowable angle on that plane just as there is on the vertical one.
     

  5. time_xx
    Joined: Sep 16, 2007
    Posts: 161

    time_xx
    Member

    While I cannot give a definitve answer on the maximum allowable angle...I don't think it is going to be an issue if you are keeping it as straight as you can.
     
  6. BigBlockMopar
    Joined: Feb 4, 2006
    Posts: 1,361

    BigBlockMopar
    Member

    With Mopar's, engines are offset aswell, and quite visible to the eye, but the rearaxle pinion is offset aswell, so everything is straight again.
     
  7. noboD
    Joined: Jan 29, 2004
    Posts: 8,489

    noboD
    Member

    Early Camaro BBs were offset from center.
     
  8. 19Fordy
    Joined: May 17, 2003
    Posts: 8,056

    19Fordy
    Member

  9. KernCountyKid
    Joined: Jul 11, 2006
    Posts: 376

    KernCountyKid
    Member
    from Arkansas

    This is what I was talking about with the horizontal plane angle. thanks for the link -

    [​IMG]
     
  10. I don't know what the max angle offset recommendations are, but you should be just fine under 5 degrees.

    I have 47,000 miles on my 32 roadster and it's doing ok with a 1" engine/trans offset to the right.

    Engine offsets are commonly done by the factories.

    The engine/trans should be square in the chassis.
     
  11. 19Fordy
    Joined: May 17, 2003
    Posts: 8,056

    19Fordy
    Member

  12. pitman
    Joined: May 14, 2006
    Posts: 5,148

    pitman

    My first intuition was not what the later sketch showed. See diagram on the right, below.
     
  13. 19Fordy
    Joined: May 17, 2003
    Posts: 8,056

    19Fordy
    Member

  14. KernCountyKid
    Joined: Jul 11, 2006
    Posts: 376

    KernCountyKid
    Member
    from Arkansas

    Methinks I've got some new trans mount holes to drill.

    This is the wrong way to do it, and although not anywhere as extreme as this picture, diagram (A) is the way I did it.
     

    Attached Files:

  15. pitman
    Joined: May 14, 2006
    Posts: 5,148

    pitman

    Yes, the figure on the right would allow the "non" CV behavior of a u-joint, to be canceled out by pair's proper phasing and equal angles. Each rotation thru an angle supposedly has a speed-up, slow-down aspect due to the geometry of four poles w/the needle brns around them. The angles are small, but clearances and wear can set up some interesting vibration "nodes" at certain velocities.
     
  16. HotRodMicky
    Joined: Oct 14, 2001
    Posts: 1,783

    HotRodMicky
    Member

    I would say Pic B is the way to do it.
    You set up your engine/trans parallel to the pinion when you determine
    your engine height.
    So i would do the same if i set it to the side.
    The u-joint wouldn't notice it .....
    my 2 ct.
    Michael
     
  17. LoBrow
    Joined: Mar 8, 2005
    Posts: 619

    LoBrow
    Member
    from MI

    Chryslers are offset to the pass side over an inch...but the whole driveline is all offset. I wouldnt want the trans tailshaft to be mounted crooked to the bellhousing area...Id say move your trans mount the same amount you did your engine....then check out your rear axle and driveshaft location
     
  18. Great info, this really helped answer my questions about the engine offset with my current project (albeit a 93 Mustang). I knew the HAMB would have the answer!
     
  19. dave lewis
    Joined: Dec 12, 2006
    Posts: 1,380

    dave lewis
    Member
    from Nampa ID

    KCK, It looks like you LOST fuel pump clearance...
    Yes, you need to move the tail over..
    And, last but not least=== the factory offsets the engine to the passenger side a small amount due to the fact that most of the time the vehicle only has the driver onboard.
    Us oval track guys set the engine over to the driver side for better left weight %..
    Dave
     
  20. nutajunka
    Joined: Jan 24, 2007
    Posts: 1,464

    nutajunka

    Engine and tras. need to be like in the "b" diagram, since it can't be centered. If at an angle like in "a" their will be a bind in the joint while revolving/ vibrations. Looks to me like you could have notched the crossmember a bit for the balancer and built the strength back in.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.