Register now to get rid of these ads!

Customs Early custom or movie prop mystery solved. 1942 was an odd styling year

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by anthony myrick, Oct 26, 2022.

  1. 1948 film “On Our Merry Way”
    Car was driven by the bad guy

    looks like a fleetline with a bunch of trim from other cars.
     
  2. oldolds
    Joined: Oct 18, 2010
    Posts: 3,410

    oldolds
    Member

    1942 Oldsmobile[​IMG]
     
  3. Well I be.
    Ya learn sumthin every day.
    Just a custom paint job

    car looked gaudy enough to be custom.
     

  4. Couldnt name this one either
    A880E7AD-DC68-46DA-A306-1DEBB47E2D67.jpeg
     
    Last edited: Oct 26, 2022
    chryslerfan55 likes this.
  5. Squablow
    Joined: Apr 26, 2005
    Posts: 17,446

    Squablow
    Member

  6. 54delray, Squablow and chryslerfan55 like this.
  7. Of course there’s a dodge !;)
    I’d drive ‘em both :D
     
  8. Me too.
    But that Oldsmobile, imagine the versions that hit the garbage cans at GM.
     
  9. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 56,095

    squirrel
    Member

    If there hadn't been a war, the next few years of Oldsmobiles might have been really bad? They sure got their act together for the 46 models, though, they had a beautiful grill
     
  10. anthony myrick likes this.
  11. [​IMG]
    Jim is right about the '46, Olds got it together.
     
    anthony myrick likes this.
  12. F-ONE
    Joined: Mar 27, 2008
    Posts: 3,271

    F-ONE
    Member
    from Alabama

    One thing that is interesting about this car is, it's a convertible sedan (tudor). Most convertibles are coupe based. That's interesting.
     
    ClayMart and anthony myrick like this.
  13. 62rebel
    Joined: Sep 1, 2008
    Posts: 3,232

    62rebel
    Member

    That Olds has the most confusing front end treatment I've seen yet
     
  14. Hnstray
    Joined: Aug 23, 2009
    Posts: 12,355

    Hnstray
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Quincy, IL

    The car is a standard GM ‘A’ Body Cabriolet (Convertible) used by Chevy, Pontiac Olds and Buick in 1942 and all but Buick from ‘46 thru ‘48. It is the same basic coupe body with a folding top. Only the angle of the photograph makes it look different by not showing the trunk lid’s actual length.

    Actually, that convertible body shell began with ‘41 models of those brands. The overall length of the top was the same, but in ‘41 there was no quarter window. The quarter window was adopted for ‘42, same as Ford/Mercury (‘41 vs ‘42) in those years.

    The other significant ‘A’ Body change was the door ‘pontoon’ front fender extensions. The ‘A’ Body was produced in slant pillar coupe, 2dr/4dr sedan and the Cabriolet. GM also produced a variety of ‘B’ & ‘C’ Bodies for all makes but Chevrolet.

    Ray
     
  15. 49ratfink
    Joined: Feb 8, 2004
    Posts: 18,854

    49ratfink
    Member
    from California

    most 1942 GM cars are funny looking compared to 1941's and the same model post war. maybe because we are not used to seeing them very often.

    saw one at the Bay Bombs show a few months back, they look really sharp when all done up and chromed.
     
    '28phonebooth and alanp561 like this.
  16. The 42 Olds is one of the rare missteps in GM front end styling during the 30s-60s.

    A face for radio, as they say.
     
    Hnstray, 62rebel and anthony myrick like this.
  17. Fooled me. I thought there was no way this thing was from GMs styling department
    Wonder if anyone was fired over this
     
    squirrel and Dan Hay like this.
  18. 302GMC
    Joined: Dec 15, 2005
    Posts: 7,878

    302GMC
    Member
    from Idaho

    Olds corporate had way more important things on their minds than styling during that period. 98% of Olds production was being converted to wartime product, and they did a great job ...
     
    Cosmo49, 49ratfink and firstinsteele like this.
  19. It takes the same effort to tool up and manufacture ugly as it does not ugly
     
    X-cpe, lewk and guthriesmith like this.
  20. F-ONE
    Joined: Mar 27, 2008
    Posts: 3,271

    F-ONE
    Member
    from Alabama

    You can see the 1950s in that grille. It makes me wonder where things would have gone.......
    if there was no war.
     
  21. BamaMav
    Joined: Jun 19, 2011
    Posts: 6,761

    BamaMav
    Member
    from Berry, AL

    I guess I’m weird. I like it better than the later grill.
     
    49ratfink and anthony myrick like this.
  22. poco
    Joined: Feb 9, 2009
    Posts: 1,239

    poco
    Member
    from oklahoma

    I didnot like the later grill either.
     
  23. BJR
    Joined: Mar 11, 2005
    Posts: 9,920

    BJR
    Member

    Good luck finding any parts for a 42 Oldsmobile.
     
    flathead1940 and anthony myrick like this.
  24. Fortunateson
    Joined: Apr 30, 2012
    Posts: 5,354

    Fortunateson
    Member

    At first glance I thought it was a “Merc-Olet” but it reminded me a bit of a ‘42 Pontiac. I agree those ‘42s from GM had some unusual grille treatment but I like both the Olds and Pontiacs....unusual to say the least and rare. Check out the ‘42 Pontiacs.
     
    anthony myrick likes this.
  25. Don’t get me wrong, I’d drive the wheels off it. But if GM never built this and some guy customized a grill set up like this, man would that be an interesting thread to read.
     
    davidvillajr likes this.
  26. alanp561
    Joined: Oct 1, 2017
    Posts: 4,647

    alanp561
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Probably not, he was probably drafted
     
    56don and anthony myrick like this.


  27. The '41 Olds was kind of an "odd duck" as well, this one also in the convertible sedan version.

    3576719383_6c67799900_z.jpg
     
  28. Boy @VANDENPLAS ..... when you bought that Murc-you-ree, you really turned a corner didn't you!
     
    anthony myrick likes this.
  29. '41 and '42 models from all manufacturers were a weird conglomeration of design features. Detroit had been involved in planning for or actually building war materiel since '39 and '40, so development $$ didn't all go into new car designs. '41's got about halfway to new stuff, '42 was just cosmetic (remember beauty is in the eye of the beholder) add-ons to get as many cars out the door until WW II started and production ceased (there was no surprise among corporate 'generals' that there would be a war that stopped production). During the early years of the war, committing resources to new design was forbidden by the government, but in '44, as the end of the war in sight, design work began on '46 models, which were refinements of the hastily put together '42's. Due to the short '42 selling season, not many cars were sold by any manufacturer, and as cars were used pretty hard during the war years, the low initial numbers translated to very few survivors, so we're not used to seeing many of these monstrosities (thank goodness). '42 was kind of the '58 of prewar cars, in terms of ugly add-ons, IMHO.
     
    49ratfink, Lepus, 302GMC and 3 others like this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.