Register now to get rid of these ads!

cutting holes in my frame. got a few questions

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by forsakenfew, Feb 25, 2006.

  1. forsakenfew
    Joined: May 30, 2003
    Posts: 1,063

    forsakenfew
    Member
    from seattle

    gonna cut a hole in each frame rail of my 60 catalina (x frame car) so i can run the exhaust through it. holes will be up front just behind the body mount. it's gotta be done like this cause when the car is laid out, the exhaust it the lowest point. and no, wont be able to route it any other way. idler arm, etc are in the way.

    anyway, the frame rail is 6"x3". how big of a hole will be safe. these will be sleeved of course. i've got some 3.5", and some 4.5". both are on the large side of 1/8 thick. is this gonna be strong enough? the bigger diameter is nice cause it gives us more room to work with, but i worry about structural integrity.

    any ideas, tips, pictures, etc? am i out of my mind? tell me now before i start cutting!!!
     
  2. Tubes, of wall thickness equal or greater to that of the frame, welded in the holes cut, will actually increase rigidity.
     
  3. forsakenfew
    Joined: May 30, 2003
    Posts: 1,063

    forsakenfew
    Member
    from seattle

    anybody else wanna chime in? i'm heading out to the shop right now to start cutting....
     
  4. Da' Bomb
    Joined: Apr 8, 2005
    Posts: 438

    Da' Bomb
    Member

    Exactly what B29 said.....Use mild steel tubing, not the aluminized exhaust tubing, weld both sides all the way around and you'll be good to go
    Pat
     

  5. tommy
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 14,757

    tommy
    Member Emeritus

    I'll "chime in"... I'd run it the way Pontiac did. Most all the X frame GM cars from this period had dual exhaust available. I'm not a Pontiac expert so you might need manifolds designed for dual exhaust. That I can't answer. I've been doing exhaust for 30 years and never cut a hole in an X frame GM car. I've cut a lot of holes in crossmembers in ladder type frames and never thought anything of it but in an X frame GM frame my gut reaction would be that it's not a good idea. Especially when I don't think it's necessary. Just my worthless opinon.
     
  6. Hard Luck
    Joined: Apr 7, 2004
    Posts: 435

    Hard Luck
    Member

    Not trying to belittle you or anything, but I'm assuming when he says "laid out", he's talking about putting it on the ground with the help of air bags, or maybe hydraulics. I would also assume, that when he does that, the exhaust would be scraping/laying on the ground, if it were run through the factory locations for the exhaust.

    Anyway, as B29 said, as long as you use the good shit, and weld it sufficiently, all will be good.

    -Aaron
     
  7. tommy
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 14,757

    tommy
    Member Emeritus

    Oh you mean you guys lower your cars???:rolleyes: :D No offense taken.

    When done right the bottom of the frame is the lowest point. This doesn't mean that the muffler will never catch and get yanked off. It does mean that going through the frame won't get the muffler any higher...the floor pan is the limiting factor for each way you do it. I usually make an angled brace for the muffler inlet. It lets the muffler ride up and over the obstuction. It doesn't always work but it helps. The original mufflers were very thin for these cars. A bullet style glasspack or straight pipes is also an option.

    If you use heavy wall tubing for the opening it will probably be OK. It just seems like a lot of unnecessary work to me.
     
  8. poncho62
    Joined: Nov 23, 2005
    Posts: 1,094

    poncho62
    BANNED

    It seems funny to me that you are saying "X" frame Pontiac....Is this a Canadian car?...........same frame as a Chevy Impala?

    These are lowered all the time, shouldn't have to go through the frame..........unless you are doing something strange with the exhaust.
     
  9. AngryJ
    Joined: Oct 4, 2005
    Posts: 2

    AngryJ
    Member
    from SEATTLE

    it's 60 catalina. has an x frame. not a canadian model.

    not running mufflers. straight out the back.

    i'll take pics when done and show ya'll what i'm dealing with. holes are cut, tubing cut, ready to be welded in. then bend new exhaust.
     
  10. poncho62
    Joined: Nov 23, 2005
    Posts: 1,094

    poncho62
    BANNED

    Learn something new every day...was not aware that the Pontiacs had "X" frames...Didn't believe you, so I researched it. I guess they used them until 61 or 62. I know the 62 Catalinas had a perimeter frame.

    My 62 Canadian Pontiac has the "X" frame, same as Impalas. The headers come out the side and the mufflers are right under the driver........I figure you want to come straight back and through the frame.

    Would appreciate some pictures, as I might think about that myself.
     
  11. 302GMC
    Joined: Dec 15, 2005
    Posts: 7,908

    302GMC
    Member
    from Idaho

    Over the years, I've dualed half a dozen '60 Pontiacs, never had any problem hiding everything under the car in the space provided from the factory ...
    302
     
  12. forsakenfew
    Joined: May 30, 2003
    Posts: 1,063

    forsakenfew
    Member
    from seattle

    well, the work is done. holes were cut, and then sleeved. new exhaust was run. this might need a little tweaking, as we were running out of time. but maybe not. drove it home, sounds fine, no rattles, etc. and it looks pretty cool. fucked my camera up, so until i find a new one, no pics.

    oh, and no more exhaust on the ground problems when the car is laid out.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.