Register now to get rid of these ads!

Hot Rods 1940 Ford Steering in the roadster-- Which way would you mount it?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Kilroy, Mar 23, 2009.

  1. Kilroy
    Joined: Aug 2, 2001
    Posts: 3,227

    Kilroy
    Member
    from Orange, Ca

    Well I've worked up about 5 different mounts and nothing really works/looks right... So I'll put it to the group...

    I've got a steering box out of a 40 Ford... I wanted to run it because it's solid, I have it, and I like the fact that the arm will point up so that the draglink doesn't slope up... Also with the way my frame is set up, with the snout under the rail, it'd be almost completely hidden behind the Split wishbones...

    I also didn't want to run the sprint car steering because it's expensive, I don't have it, the ratios can be an issue, and I really am not crazy about having that long draglink running back to the cowl... Some days it looks ok to me... Somedays I don't like the look...

    So it should be pretty easy to flip the box sideways and fab up a pice of angle to mount to the stock steering box mounting holes right?...

    Not so much actually....

    Since I'm using the Spencer roadster as inspiration, and have pinched the frame rails... There isn't a whole lot of room to mess with. It's not as tight as say a 60 t-bird, but it's tight...

    Also the frame rails slope in pretty rapidly towards to the front, so the box has to be as far back as possible...

    Long story short... In order to keep the column centered between the 39 pedals and the mount on the 36 dash, the steering box would have to be cut in to the lower lip of the rail...

    So my choices are...

    Option A----Notch the lower lip of the rail a bit (Maybe .5") and mount the box with the snout under the rail and fab up the appropriate mounts.

    The problem with this one is I'm not sure what notching the rail would do to the strength...


    Option B----The other option I have is to trim all the stock 40 Ford mounts off the box, buy a flange from Tardel (0r have one made for me) and mount the box through the rail similar to the stock 32 mount... Only probably a bit lower in the rail.

    The problem with this is the steering arm will sit up pretty high and won't be as hidden as if the box were mounted under the rail....


    Suggestions... Here's some really crappy pics of what I'm talking about... My camera is dead right now...
     

    Attached Files:

  2. option C: mount the box the way it was in a `40 Ford and cross steer it

    the world famous Rocky `33 has that setup
     
  3. SUHRsc
    Joined: Sep 27, 2005
    Posts: 5,093

    SUHRsc
    Member

    can you remove only one stock mounting hole and add another one somewhere else on the box and then fit it underneath?

    heres where I put mine if it helps at all?(probably not?)

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  4. Kevin Lee
    Joined: Nov 12, 2001
    Posts: 7,584

    Kevin Lee
    Super Moderator
    Staff Member

    Cross steer sounds like a good idea but with the spring mounted behind I'm guessing there will be all kinds of issues with interference. Also trying to run the column down the side of the engine with pinched rails would be impossible.

    I'm pretty familiar with what you are doing since I had the same box on my modified. If it was my car and I had that box? I would probably notch the frame rail if I had to... but look at the geometry again. It would not be a bad thing to have the draglink sloping uphill a bit.

    Still working on steering with my pinched rails. Will likely using an F1 box.
     


  5. hard to say without a mock up. Pete & Jake's now make extra long steering arms for this , i believe they call them "suicide steering arms"
     
  6. Kilroy
    Joined: Aug 2, 2001
    Posts: 3,227

    Kilroy
    Member
    from Orange, Ca

    Not an option unfortunately... I actually thought that might work before I started on the frame...

    With the rails pinched, there's just not enough room in the right places for that to work...

    Even with the bottom-inside mount cut off, the rail would likely have to be notched a bit...

    But, I'm starting to get the feeling I need to just pick a solution and start cutting to see if it'll work... I just can't seem to visualize it any better than I already have...
     
  7. Kilroy
    Joined: Aug 2, 2001
    Posts: 3,227

    Kilroy
    Member
    from Orange, Ca

    I've been watching those posts closely on here...

    I wouldn't have a problem running the arm down on another build... I'm having a hard time giving up on this setup... It feels like there's a simple solution just beyond my grasp... Frustrating really...

    But I need to get a non-column shift housing for this box anyway so maybe it would be easier just to try to scrounge up a complete F-1 box and column...
     
  8. thunderbirdesq
    Joined: Feb 15, 2006
    Posts: 7,092

    thunderbirdesq
    Member

    I have the same box setup on my '34 pickup like that. I'll see if I can dig up some pics when I get home today. Honestly, it's not a great solution and the way mine is done, the geometry is slightly less than desireable. It works, I've put about 12k miles on it, but I've been thinking of re-doing it with an f1 box...
     
  9. Kilroy
    Joined: Aug 2, 2001
    Posts: 3,227

    Kilroy
    Member
    from Orange, Ca

    I cut the bottom, outward mount off the box last night and looked at it again...

    Still lots of issues but I think I can get it on there...

    How thick is the casting on these boxes? Do I have enough meat to grind a bit for clearance?

    Also, If I moved the box in .5" or so, would that make everything wonky behind the wheel? Do you think I'd even notice it?
     
  10. Andy
    Joined: Nov 17, 2002
    Posts: 5,121

    Andy
    Member

    Would a Mustang box help with clearance? I have one somewhere. I could photo for you. I also have a junk 40 box housing you could cut up if wanted.
     
  11. Kevin Lee
    Joined: Nov 12, 2001
    Posts: 7,584

    Kevin Lee
    Super Moderator
    Staff Member

    I don't understand why you would cut a mount off? Or maybe I don't fully get what you've decided to do?

    Here is my box mounted. Draglink is slightly uphill in relation to the split wishbone - which was close to level as I remember it. Draw a line off of the back of the draglink and it would intersect the tie rod pivot or be really close. Screw trying to keep the wishbone and draglink parallel. Unless they are the same length and in the same location fore and aft, it is not the best geometry, period.

    With a pinched Deuce frame you might have to adjust here and there, but I wouldn't think you would need to grind or cut anything off? Looking from here I think you're way overthinking it. And that's saying something coming from me.

    get the box on the frame - clamped or whatever. Shoot the column through your pedals and take steering wheel clearance (against the door) into account, and just make a mount from the holes to the frame. Big gussets, weld it in, done. I'll be looking for pics tomorrow. :)
     

    Attached Files:

    • box1.jpg
      box1.jpg
      File size:
      48.3 KB
      Views:
      219
  12. Kilroy
    Joined: Aug 2, 2001
    Posts: 3,227

    Kilroy
    Member
    from Orange, Ca

    I don't think the mustang box wouls help much with clearance... But if you don't need the 40 box that could help... You have a PM

    Thanks!
     
  13. Kilroy
    Joined: Aug 2, 2001
    Posts: 3,227

    Kilroy
    Member
    from Orange, Ca

    OK, I see where I wasn't clear...

    I modified your pic to show it better. (Thanks for the pic BTW. That's kind of how I pictured my mount. I needed the visual.)

    The red circle is the mount I had to cut off because it interfered with the bottom lip on the frame rail...

    The blue circle is the mount that is untouched but in order for the column to be ever remotely close to centered between the brake and clutch pedals, this mount actually sits inside the frame chanel.

    It's actually still about .5" off center between the pedals to the inside of the car. But I don't think that would be much of an issue... I might have to move the dash around a bit to get the gauges in the right place...

    With Guys like Zach, Bass and Iona etc on here... I find myself overthinking everything... I eventually come to terms with my Hack-ness and just weld shit up... But Sometimes it takes longer than other times... :D
     

    Attached Files:

  14. Andy
    Joined: Nov 17, 2002
    Posts: 5,121

    Andy
    Member

    Compairison of Mustang,Maverick box and 40 box. It looks like it would gain you some room and not have any ears cut off. I got this last year at New Braunfels Swap for $20
     

    Attached Files:

  15. Kilroy
    Joined: Aug 2, 2001
    Posts: 3,227

    Kilroy
    Member
    from Orange, Ca

    I have got to go to the NB swap... I've never made it out there. Something always comes up...

    The Mustang box itself looks like it would provide a bit more room but I think all the bracketry on it might be in the way. Also it's a bit too new for the theme of this particular car... Thanks a bunch for showing the pic though...

    Ok... So I have the mount all templetted out now... Do you think 3/16" plate is thick enough with some judicously designed gussets... Kind of like what Kevin did? Or do I need to get some 1/4?

    In addition to the mount to the frame, I plan on fabbing something that mounts the snout to the bottom of the rail too...
     
  16. Kevin Lee
    Joined: Nov 12, 2001
    Posts: 7,584

    Kevin Lee
    Super Moderator
    Staff Member

    Like this? :)
     
  17. Kilroy
    Joined: Aug 2, 2001
    Posts: 3,227

    Kilroy
    Member
    from Orange, Ca

    HAH!! That was me asking about that mount I bet...

    I missed that post. Thanks for the refresher!

    I was actually just thinking about welding something to the box... Or really having someone weld something to the box. But I guess it's kind of a sketchy deal welding to the cast boxes so maybe something like that would be better...

    In any case, that part can wait untill I get the rest of the box mounted...

    I guess 1/4" would be better... But I think 3/16 would work with the snout mount and some gussets like you have.
     
  18. Kilroy
    Joined: Aug 2, 2001
    Posts: 3,227

    Kilroy
    Member
    from Orange, Ca

    Ok, so here's what I came up with so far...

    It's just tacked in right now and needs to be moved around a little bit, but you get the idea. ;)

    the bracket extends all the way into the frame rail, will be completely welded when position correctly and will be 'captured' by the boxing plates...

    It will also have some gussets for strength/rigidity and the formentioned snout mount...

    ...That is... Unless I decide to shit-can the whole thing... :D
     

    Attached Files:

  19. saltracer219
    Joined: Sep 23, 2006
    Posts: 1,078

    saltracer219
    Member

    My Buddy Briz has the old Hergert Bros track roadster built in 53 in Portland Or. It has 40 ford steering mounted in it's original cross steer configuration. Works great, no clearance issues. PM me if you need his number, Gary.....
     
  20. Kilroy
    Joined: Aug 2, 2001
    Posts: 3,227

    Kilroy
    Member
    from Orange, Ca

    I'd love to see pics of the car if you have any...

    But in order to make cross steering work on my frame, the box would have to be mounted under the left water pump of the flathead and the front crossmember would have to be notched.... And even after all that, the snout would hang down so far that stinkbugs and highway pavers would be cursing my name for generations...

    Not to mention all the u-joint monkey motion going on to make it work...

    Like I said though, if it could be done, it'd definately be my first choice.

    And again, what I'm doing is in no way set in stone so keep the suggestions coming...
     
  21. The Pinched deuce frame and tight frame to motor/exhaust clearance seems to be an on-going issue with alot of builds. It seems hard to get your steering wheel on the right angle/height/ and centered with your seat when you're going with the straight column to box connections.

    I'm doing a 29 on a pinched deuce frame now and have my F-1 box mocked up on top of the frame rail, but inside the cowl. I have the cowl panel off the body and plan to make an inverted cowl blister type deal to finish off the panel and make it all tight against the elements. The amount of bracketry and nonsense to mount it is an ugly headache though!! hahah

    I know that doesn't help you...but i definately feel your pain!

    Couldn't you notch the framerail and then box it back in, like a c-notch if you still wanted to notch the frame?

    Regardless, I do like the idea you have in your latest pic...can't see why that idea won't work.

    I looked at a friends 34 last week...he mounted the box on its side but cut the steering shaft off and mounted the box parallel to the framerail, rather than on an angle like in your pic. Then he used to u-joints outside the firewall to make the connection....like you said though, the u-joint monkey motion has to happen.

    Keep us posted.
    -Steve
     
  22. Andy
    Joined: Nov 17, 2002
    Posts: 5,121

    Andy
    Member

    The Dick Smith roadster in the Ford museum has a 331 hemi and a 40 Ford steering box. The box is cross steer mounted. The box is way aft and the steering link goes forward at a pretty good angle. He had no problems with driving it as his daily for 30+? years. Just a thought
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.