Register now to get rid of these ads!

Hot Rods 1939 Ford Convertible dilemma

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by 55styleliner, Oct 13, 2019.

?
  1. 327

    3 vote(s)
    33.3%
  2. Flathead

    6 vote(s)
    66.7%
  1. 55styleliner
    Joined: May 11, 2015
    Posts: 494

    55styleliner
    Member

    I bought a nice solid 1939 Ford Convertible this weekend. It was supposed to be a quick flip. Well, I got impatient when buying (from a known seller) and didn’t test drive it. Got it home and took it for a short ride, zero oil pressure and a rod knock when warm. So, I need to change out the engine. I’ve got a good 327 Chevy and have a lead on a good running 8BA Flathead. Purely in the sense of resale value, should I put the 327 in it or stick with a Flathead? Assuming the cost to do either is the same, actually I think the Flathead will cost more.
    98E5280B-5D03-4C7D-80C3-88C385513904.jpeg D8565F2F-2244-42E4-87F2-1C7DB6A0BCD3.jpeg E27489F2-AE06-4D27-A928-D51EBC4D3439.jpeg B8C856E4-2759-4FCE-A4F5-E3AB6159C4B3.jpeg
     
    catdad49 likes this.
  2. buds56
    Joined: Dec 9, 2004
    Posts: 175

    buds56
    Member

    If it was me I would pull what's in it and see what it will take to remedy the existing problem. May just be turning the crank, bearings, gaskets, rings and the rods checked for resizing.
    JMO, Good luck
     
    flatford39 likes this.
  3. flatford39
    Joined: Dec 3, 2006
    Posts: 2,307

    flatford39
    Member

    My favorite car....are you sure it's a rod knock or is it related to ignition??? Is it currently a flathead??? Low oil pressure shouldn't be a problem with FH.
     
  4. 55styleliner
    Joined: May 11, 2015
    Posts: 494

    55styleliner
    Member

    It sounds very metallic, loudest when coasting or holding a steady rpm above idle. It is quiet at idle and while decelerating. You can here it while accelerating but is not as loud as when coasting at a steady rpm. I have had others listen to it and they also feel it’s a rod.
     
    Register now to get rid of these ads!

  5. catdad49
    Joined: Sep 25, 2005
    Posts: 3,592

    catdad49
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    For this car, I think that I would stay with a flatty. If you have changed your mind about a flip, then your options open up.
     
    Just Gary and Hamtown Al like this.
  6. Gman0046
    Joined: Jul 24, 2005
    Posts: 5,612

    Gman0046
    Member

    Over the years, I've had a couple of flathead powered cars and none of them had the performance to satisfiy me. Installing a 327 in the 39 Ford is a no brainer. It will bring more money when you sell it.
     
  7. s55mercury66
    Joined: Jul 6, 2009
    Posts: 3,683

    s55mercury66
    Member
    from SW Wyoming

    In that car, a flathead.
     
    Just Gary and mgtstumpy like this.
  8. I'd pay more for the 327 conversion, only because that's what I would do, but just adapted to the 39 driveline.
    Easiest fix, is the flathead. Selling price would be close either way; but that's me.
     
  9. 1946caddy
    Joined: Dec 18, 2013
    Posts: 1,492

    1946caddy
    Member
    from washington

    Since you have to pull the engine either way.
    Take the flathead apart and see whats wrong with it before deciding.
     
    Frankie47 and mgtstumpy like this.
  10. The 39 guy
    Joined: Nov 5, 2010
    Posts: 2,660

    The 39 guy
    Member

    Fix the flathead if you are just flipping the car. Let the next owner decide if he wants to make the overhead swap.
     
    40FORDPU and mgtstumpy like this.
  11. studebaker46
    Joined: Nov 14, 2007
    Posts: 607

    studebaker46
    Member

    if you install the 327 you are not wanna flip it IMHO Tom
     
  12. BamaMav
    Joined: Jun 19, 2011
    Posts: 3,360

    BamaMav
    Member
    from Berry, AL

    If I had that car it wouldn't leave here until I croak!
     
    55styleliner likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2020 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.