Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical 1938 vs 1939 Chevy Truck

Discussion in 'Traditional Customs' started by RocketKing, Jan 15, 2016.

  1. RocketKing
    Joined: May 9, 2011
    Posts: 4

    RocketKing
    Member
    from Ozarks

    I've been a late 60s truck guy for awhile but I have been looking for something different since so many of that era are being built. I have gotten interested in the older versions and have found both a '38 and '39.

    Outside of the cosmetic area what are the major differences? I believe the cab on the 39 is bigger, right? Is one "better" than the other or does it just come down to individual taste?
    Just looking for information any facts or opinions anyone has would be appreciated
     
  2. inthweedz
    Joined: Mar 29, 2011
    Posts: 581

    inthweedz
    Member

    We (my son and I ) checked out a 39 truck a month ago, here in New Zealand..
    Looking at the cab size, I would say they are possibly the same size.
    The 37 has a one piece flat screen, whereas the 39 is a two piece, angled screen..
     
  3. RocketKing
    Joined: May 9, 2011
    Posts: 4

    RocketKing
    Member
    from Ozarks

    Interesting. I thought I had read somewhere the cab was taller and wider on a 39. I hadnt even noticed the windshield! Thanks for the input!
     
  4. 'Mo
    Joined: Sep 26, 2007
    Posts: 7,432

    'Mo
    Member

    Last edited: Dec 3, 2017
    nunattax likes this.

  5. Blade58
    Joined: Mar 5, 2012
    Posts: 363

    Blade58
    Member
    from apopka ,Fl

    Try this site Type in the year +GMHeritagecenter .com to compare hope this helps you out, this is my 38 IMG_1017.JPG
     
    nunattax and volvobrynk like this.
  6. Joe H
    Joined: Feb 10, 2008
    Posts: 1,550

    Joe H
    Member

    '37-'38 are the same with grill and hood changes. '39 is different cab, hood, fenders, and frame. '39 is very similar to '40, in '41 they switched again and kept the style through the war till '46. '39 may be slightly bigger then '37-8 trucks, but not by much. Drivetrain will be the same.
     
    volvobrynk likes this.
  7. RocketKing
    Joined: May 9, 2011
    Posts: 4

    RocketKing
    Member
    from Ozarks

    Thanks for all the help and especially the pics! Man, both years are great looking, tough decision.

    I did find this articles: http://www.pickuptrucks.com/html/history/chev_segment3.html

    It state that there are some differences in the cab sizes...
    however it also says that the 39 is by far the best looking truck in Division history to that point. lol

    That's the way fights start! lol
     
    volvobrynk likes this.
  8. volvobrynk
    Joined: Jan 30, 2011
    Posts: 3,587

    volvobrynk
    Member
    from Denmark

    Pictures, is important.
    Pictures, or it never happend.
     
  9. bubba55
    Joined: Feb 27, 2011
    Posts: 455

    bubba55
    Member

    The late'36 ( has wood in it ) '37 & '38 share same cab size - '39 -'46 same - check Jim Carter out - has info on these trucks - be aware of sheet metal parts differences - some is hard and $$ to find - good luck
     
  10. wingedexpress
    Joined: Dec 24, 2006
    Posts: 893

    wingedexpress

    RocketKing likes this.
  11. dorf
    Joined: Dec 5, 2008
    Posts: 1,087

    dorf
    Member
    from ohio

    my opinion is the 39 and 40 are a much better looking truck. looked for one for years , found my ford and built it .
     
  12. cshades
    Joined: Sep 2, 2011
    Posts: 557

    cshades
    Member
    from wi

    I like the 39 and 40 more but i am a little biased:)
     
  13. 'Mo
    Joined: Sep 26, 2007
    Posts: 7,432

    'Mo
    Member

    Well, that explains the "40 CHEV" license plate! LOL
    Certainly, the 1937 trucks had the same sveldt, Art-Deco styling of the beautiful passenger car offerings of that year.
    The grille's the same, but check out the load capabilities of that babbited, spray oiled, first generation 216!

    ( Note also the one piece wind shield, as inthweedz pointed out.)

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Jan 17, 2016
  14. RocketKing
    Joined: May 9, 2011
    Posts: 4

    RocketKing
    Member
    from Ozarks

    Amazing! Gonna have to keep this pic.

    Fellas, thanks for all the help. I hope everything works out that I can get one of these old girls and hang around to learn a ton from you all.
    I like both styles but since I am 6'4" I may need all the room I can get! Lol
     
    volvobrynk likes this.
  15. nunattax
    Joined: Jan 10, 2011
    Posts: 3,068

    nunattax
    Member
    from IRELAND

    iva 38 half ton(still under construction.)from looking at pictures I would say the 40 windscreen is taller..legroom is tight in a 38.two ways I found to compensate for this raise your seat height,thin out the seat back,move the throttle pedal to the right as far as practical.i also moved the brake pedal to the right of the column.(auto trans).im under 6ft
    but its still tight in there
    as far as I know the 40 dash has vents in the dash for defroster,39? ,38 has not
     
    Last edited: Dec 3, 2017
  16. cheepsk8
    Joined: Sep 5, 2011
    Posts: 642

    cheepsk8
    Member
    from west ky

    My son has a 40 3/4 ton long bed (he loves the length), but of course it is lowered and pretty nice. We looked at several 39s along the way and cosmetically they were about the same as the 40. Seems like there is a difference in the upper grille bar and I am pretty sure the 40 upper bar is not reproduced. Lots of costly things to buy as you restore one, so buy the most complete one you can. Not much reproduced on the interior either.
     
  17. nunattax
    Joined: Jan 10, 2011
    Posts: 3,068

    nunattax
    Member
    from IRELAND

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.