Register now to get rid of these ads!

Projects Math Makes My Head Hurt

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by 302aod, Jan 16, 2014.

  1. 302aod
    Joined: Dec 19, 2011
    Posts: 275

    302aod
    Member
    from Pelham,Tn.

    My 64 F100 has a 8.8 rear end with 3.08 ratio. It has a 302 and Aod. What rear end ratio and tire size would be best for cruising and decent mileage? Thanks
     
  2. Coyote13
    Joined: Apr 25, 2012
    Posts: 73

    Coyote13
    Member
    from Dallas, TX

  3. KJSR
    Joined: Mar 7, 2008
    Posts: 2,489

    KJSR
    Member
    from Utah
    1. Utah HAMBers

  4. Hnstray
    Joined: Aug 23, 2009
    Posts: 12,355

    Hnstray
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Quincy, IL

    Pick the tire size that you think has the look you want...THEN run the math, because tire size is part of the final equation.

    That said, assuming you use a tire of about 28" diameter or so, probably a ratio in the are of 3.55 would work well. You could use a 3.73 as an alternative, but I wouldn't go that high (numerically) unless I wanted a strong performance vs cruise outcome.
     

  5. All depends on what rpms your 302 wants to run best at.
    308 and OD isn't usually the best combo unless you are making peak torque well below 2000 Rpms or running well above the legal speed limits.
     
  6. Coyote13
    Joined: Apr 25, 2012
    Posts: 73

    Coyote13
    Member
    from Dallas, TX

    The 302 in my F250 runs just under 3k rpm cruising on the highway at about 65-70, running a C4 (1:1 in 3rd gear), 245/75r16 tires and 3.73 in the rear.

    I would prefer a shorter tire once I lower it, but that will put me over 3k cruising. Good to see you're doing your homework before making changes, it's worth it!
     
  7. 3wLarry
    Joined: Mar 11, 2005
    Posts: 12,804

    3wLarry
    Member Emeritus
    from Owasso, Ok

    mph x gear ratio x 336 divided by tire diameter= rpm's

    example... 70 mph x 3.00 x 336 divided by 30"= 2352 rpm's
     
    kidcampbell71 likes this.
  8. Ebbsspeed
    Joined: Nov 11, 2005
    Posts: 6,257

    Ebbsspeed
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    ^This. It depends on how mild (or radical) the engine is. A stock engine will have decent torque at lower RPM's than a screaming high horsepower monster that wails like satan's chainsaw. You need to take everything into account before attempting the math.
     
  9. Rusty O'Toole
    Joined: Sep 17, 2006
    Posts: 9,660

    Rusty O'Toole
    Member

    You have a real economy gear ratio now, especially for a pickup. I doubt you would gain enough from a change to make it worth the trouble and expense. The gears you have now should be fine if you don't carry heavy loads or pull a trailer.

    The 302 is one of the best motors for economy and decent power. You should be getting 18mpg on the hiway, maybe a little better. You are never going to beat the Hondas. If you baby the gas pedal and get significantly less than that, I would look elsewhere than the rear axle for the answer.
     
  10. Aod Trans = 0.67 :1 over drive.
     
  11. Not always true.
    With numerically higher rear gears and overdrive -
    You get the added benefits of moving the load easier thru leverage 1-2-3 gear. Saves gas.

    Then OD gives momentum and leverage the to save gas by knock the rear gears down.

    It's all compromise and choosing the correct components to work together.
    However you do it, it starts with a target rpm set by the engine.
     
  12. 327Eric
    Joined: May 9, 2008
    Posts: 2,126

    327Eric
    Member

    There a lot of tire calculators online that can help you adjust your rpms with tire size. If you arent Towing or drag racing, 3.08s are great. I did tow with a set in my 66 c10 for years, no problem, although i was weak going over Donner pass, and Pacheco Pass, and on burnouts, although I hooked up well on the launch.
     
  13. Joe H
    Joined: Feb 10, 2008
    Posts: 1,550

    Joe H
    Member

    Just look at what Ford did when gearing there trucks. Compare weights, tire size, and engine modifications. Wind drag is a big killer of milage, so lugging the engine against the wind in overdrive is not ideal. My '37 Chevy has a 3.08 with 235/75R15 tire, about 28.5" tall, and runs 2700 rpm at 65-70 mph. This is perfect for the little 250 inline engine. Fuel milage drops drastically going against the wind.

    Joe
     
  14. Sorry, your thread starter reminded me of the infamous Talking Barbie that said, "Math is hard- let's go SHOPPING!", and got the women's lib movement all upset years ago:D

    Okay, sorry again for the OT Brain Fart rant, PLEASE go on :)
     
  15. AnimalAin
    Joined: Jul 20, 2002
    Posts: 3,416

    AnimalAin
    Member

    If you run a thirty inch rear tire, the rear gear numbers will tell you how many rpm you will need at 90 mph. For example, a 3.00 overall gear ratio will turn 3000 rpm at 90. The setup you have will turn about 2000-2100 rpm at 90 mph. There are a lot of modern cars that are geared that tall, but I think you are better off to go with a 3.55-3.73-4.10 rear gear, which will give you a fast cruise rpm at 75-80 mph between 2100 and 2500 rpm.

    By the way, I seldom run at 90 mph; that's just where the numbers are equal.
     
  16. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 56,088

    squirrel
    Member

    Had a crown vic with a 4.6 and electronic AOD and 3.08 gears. Worked great for cruising.

    But also I once installed a 302 and AOD in a guys 56 ford truck with 3.00 gears. Sucked for cruising. Installed 3.55s and it was great.

    I think the car got away with the longer gear because of the better aerodynamics or something.
     
  17. Mike51Merc
    Joined: Dec 5, 2008
    Posts: 3,855

    Mike51Merc
    Member

    Yeah, why do the math when you can just ask others to do it for you.
     
  18. CharlieLed
    Joined: Feb 21, 2003
    Posts: 2,463

    CharlieLed
    Member

    I run 3.73 trac-loc
     
  19. 327Eric
    Joined: May 9, 2008
    Posts: 2,126

    327Eric
    Member

    Missed the AOD part. I had an O/T 86 Chevy 4wd with 3.08s and o/d. I was running 32 inch tires. I switched to 3.73's, and gained more power, and my mileage went up . I don't remember how much, but I definately noticed.
     
  20. You really need to pick one (tire size) or the other (rear end gear) to figure this out.
    You can't solve for X if you don't have the rest of the numbers in the equation!
     
  21. You're gonna give the guy a stroke don. You went from math to solving for x with multiple variables.
     
  22. pitman
    Joined: May 14, 2006
    Posts: 5,148

    pitman

    He-he, one equation...and two unknowns!
     
  23. tfeverfred
    Joined: Nov 11, 2006
    Posts: 15,791

    tfeverfred
    Member Emeritus

    Check your math.
     
  24. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,341

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    I just ran the numbers through the Randys R&P calculator, I get 2588 at 90 mph with an AOD, 3.73s and a 30" tire. Fred, have you missed the OD?
     
    Last edited: Jan 16, 2014
  25. tfeverfred
    Joined: Nov 11, 2006
    Posts: 15,791

    tfeverfred
    Member Emeritus

    LOL Yup.:D
     
  26. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,341

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    Its all good, check out my gaffe on the "does anybody rebuild rods anymore" thread...:eek:;)
     
  27. My OT cars with OD have "rear" gears somewhere around a 4.10 ratio. In my 2012 Malibu, 70 mph is somewhere around 2000 RPMs on the tach. On a recent trip my gas mileage was 34.5 at 75-80 mph.

    So the 3.55-4.10 gearing is in the ballpark, depending on tire size.

    Bob
     

  28. [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.