Register now to get rid of these ads!

Ram horns vs. Block huggers

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Br8kNek, Aug 16, 2013.

  1. Br8kNek
    Joined: Dec 9, 2012
    Posts: 49

    Br8kNek
    Member

    So I finally decided to go with a 350 SBC in my 54 Bel Air, even though most of the responses to my query said to stay with the original inline 6. My decision was based on cost, reliability, and ease of finding parts.

    Anyhow, Ive started getting all the parts together and I'm trying to decide between block hugger headers or ram horn headers. I know that with a V8 in my 54 its going to be a tight fit. I have a Mustang II and custom steering linkage.

    My question is, which provides more clearance, power, better sound, etc? Will I need a mini starter with either of them?

    Any info is greatly appreciated.
     
    1Nimrod likes this.
  2. krylon32
    Joined: Jan 29, 2006
    Posts: 9,472

    krylon32
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Nebraska
    1. Central Nebraska H.A.M.B.

    I've been using the ram horns from Speedway on several cars I have built. They tuck in toward the block which helps steering clearance. They are quieter than headers. I always use a Powermaster mini starter but I think a stocker would fit.
     
  3. Buzznut
    Joined: May 9, 2008
    Posts: 2,349

    Buzznut
    Member

    Block huggers get extremely hot, make spark plug changes difficult, don't always clear everything, and like any other header, will leak...it gets annoying. Rams horn are a better choice IMO. I have 2 1/2" Vette rams Horns on my 400+hp 327 and it breathes great and runs hard.

    A stock started fits fine with the Vette Rams Horns...

    The exhaust system is responsible for the ultimate exhaust sound, not the exhaust manifold.
     
  4. The block huggers are lighter but imo the vette rams horns look way cooler.
     

  5. I'm livin that right now. I'm running the same setup, 54, MII. I went with the rams horn. The area between the frame, manifold, and steering shaft is pretty tight. I've had to do some "adjustments" to get it where I'm comfortable. For me the traditional look is worth the effort.
     
    1Nimrod likes this.
  6. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 33,986

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I saw a photo of a little yellow Deuce 5 window with ramhorns that was taken at Bonneville this past week and my first thought was that there was a car you could jump in and drive for miles on end without a hassle. I'd say that if the rig is intended to be a long distance road burner the ramhorns would have the advantage.
     
    1Nimrod likes this.
  7. Br8kNek
    Joined: Dec 9, 2012
    Posts: 49

    Br8kNek
    Member

    Hey Dutch54

    Do you have any pics of your ram horns installed? Would like to see how tight of a fit it is on both sides. Would greatly appreciate it.
     
    1Nimrod likes this.
  8. Are you guys talking about the "ram horn - style" manifolds Speedway markets or the original ram horn manifolds?


    Posted using the Full Custom H.A.M.B. App!
     
  9. Seepwater
    Joined: Aug 13, 2006
    Posts: 171

    Seepwater
    Member

  10. black 62
    Joined: Jul 12, 2012
    Posts: 1,895

    black 62
    Member
    from arkansas

    speedway sells both kinds of cast iron manifolds...
     
    1Nimrod likes this.
  11. 26hotrod
    Joined: Nov 28, 2009
    Posts: 1,151

    26hotrod
    Member
    from landis n c

    i use the vette ram horne on my coupe cause that is the way it was built. had em powder coated to match the alumn. heads. looks great & never had any leaks. even with angle plug heads the plugs change very easy.ive had a lot of guys say they wish the had not gone the header route due to leaks..................
     
  12. The Bomber
    Joined: Dec 10, 2005
    Posts: 548

    The Bomber
    Member
    from mass.

    I had block huggers on my car, went back to ram horns. No more problems, staying where they are. You won't regret it.
     
  13. BAD PENNY
    Joined: Aug 22, 2011
    Posts: 1,250

    BAD PENNY
    Member
    from mass

    Here's a shot of my motor with the GM "ram's horns". They fit pretty tight and look good IMO. Except for the damn 1800 Deg. VHT paint that has flaked off twice !!!!

    DSC00986.JPG
     
    1Nimrod likes this.
  14. Hotrodmyk
    Joined: Jan 7, 2011
    Posts: 2,307

    Hotrodmyk
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    1. Northwest HAMBers

    Same here, ram horns fit well, no leaks no BS. Also this is 2 year old VHT. Blasted then, baked in an oven and then installed them a few days later. No fading or flaking.
     

    Attached Files:

    1Nimrod likes this.
  15. xhotrodder
    Joined: Jul 2, 2009
    Posts: 1,665

    xhotrodder
    Member

    I save this picture that I got somewhere. It shows how I want my engine to look. I think the stock ram horns from a 68-72 Chevy truck have the turn up like this to clear the steering shaft. I remember my old 56 Chevy had a 58 corvette engine in it and the ram horns went straight down into the exhaust pipe. I don't think you can beat a good looking set of ram horns.
     

    Attached Files:

    1Nimrod and pecker head like this.
  16. i ran into a header issue to with my build,nothign would fit between the frame and my steering/clutch likage so i am going over teh frame and out the bottom of the fenders
     
  17. gnichols
    Joined: Mar 6, 2008
    Posts: 11,355

    gnichols
    Member
    from Tampa, FL


    That is a nice looking engine. Does / did anyone ever made a cast version / look-alike that wasn't so heavy? Gary
     
  18. Man I'd like to find a set of these...The best I can make of the casting number is 3932473 (?)
    Online application charts show '69/'70 Chevy "B" body, 307/350" for that number..
    Anybody else got more info on this type of rams-horn manifolds...

    xhotrodder : Can you look @ the casting number for the manifolds in the pic you posted???
     

    Attached Files:

    pecker head likes this.
  19. Hackerbilt
    Joined: Aug 13, 2001
    Posts: 6,254

    Hackerbilt
    Member

    Heavy? They're tiny compared to the manifolds on many engines! :confused:

    If they are a bit heavy I can personally deal with the weight no prob.
    I mean...LOOK at them!
    They're beautiful!
    Block huggers are like costume jewelry...cheap looking and blingy...besides the issues they have in use.
     
  20. gnichols
    Joined: Mar 6, 2008
    Posts: 11,355

    gnichols
    Member
    from Tampa, FL

    ^ I certainly agree, they sure are neat looking. Gary
     
  21. big duece
    Joined: Jul 28, 2008
    Posts: 6,830

    big duece
    Member
    from kansas

    1Nimrod likes this.
  22. USA Tires Sign Joe
    Joined: Aug 13, 2006
    Posts: 1,072

    USA Tires Sign Joe
    Member
    from Western NJ

    Ram's horns look great and are unique, everyone has block huggers.
     
  23. belair
    Joined: Jul 10, 2006
    Posts: 9,015

    belair
    Member

    the older I get, the less I like headers
     
  24. dan31
    Joined: Jul 3, 2011
    Posts: 1,097

    dan31
    Member

    I got block huggers on my 54 (mll,sbc)and had to go with a mini starter which keeps on getting cooked .ram horns look cooler...now you got me thinking.
     

  25. Same here. My 54 has cast manifolds.
     
  26. amadeus
    Joined: Dec 27, 2006
    Posts: 321

    amadeus
    Member


    I might have read wrong , but when you click on the price list for the extrude honing it has $700 dollars plus to extrude a set of V8 manifolds!!
    Damn!! That's expensive!
     
  27. big duece
    Joined: Jul 28, 2008
    Posts: 6,830

    big duece
    Member
    from kansas

    I am trying to put together a car that would have ALL the parts available for that period, being early 60's. Block huggers that we see today were not around. The only header I would consider is the old Hedman headers, they are cool and period. And NO, this is not my car!
     

    Attached Files:

    1Nimrod likes this.
  28. In the chevy parts interchange books the above info is correct for driver side turnback manifolds. The '68-'72 chevy trucks had a turnback manifold on the passenger side. These as a pair on Fords from '35-'40 with MII type front suspension work really well because you can run the exaust through the frame. You can also use the '68-'72 truck passenger side turnback manifold on '35-'40 fords with stock type suspension on the drivers side. It points forward which allows the exhaust to go around the steering box and then back towards the back of the vehicle. They make repops of the passenger side truck maniflod but most have threaded A.I.R. bungs in them. I have not seen repops of the '69-70 car driver side turnback ones but thats not to say they are not out there. Below is a picture of the truck manifold I am using on my Model a build.

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Aug 18, 2013
    1Nimrod likes this.
  29. stimpy
    Joined: Apr 16, 2006
    Posts: 3,546

    stimpy


    sandblast the paint off and try the antiseize coating trick , they look nice after its cured and is very durable too .

    as for choices , I like the rams horn , more durable than the headers , and one guy at the race track found his car performed better with them than cheap blockhuggers , and there quieter under the hood and no exhaust leak ticks that you get if the flange warps on the Block huggers, as for exhaust note , the RH have the pop sound to them not like the headers which is smoother .
     
  30. It's not that I don't like the rams horn exhaust but when you are able to score a free set of block hugger exhaust because the guy wants chrome it's a no brainier! HRP

    [​IMG]
     
    1Nimrod likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.