Register now to get rid of these ads!

Let's Talk Cyclecars

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Bigcheese327, Dec 4, 2007.

  1. banjeaux bob
    Joined: Aug 31, 2008
    Posts: 6,639

    banjeaux bob
    Member
    from alaska

    Looking for identification.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. bobadame
    Joined: Jan 20, 2009
    Posts: 174

    bobadame
    Member

    This looks like fun.
     

    Attached Files:

  3. Hardhatz
    Joined: Jun 28, 2009
    Posts: 24

    Hardhatz
    Member

    Well, I just bought a spare set of Max cases on eBay.

    http://www.ebay.com/itm/1986-Yamaha-Vmx1200-V-max-v-max-motor-engine-crank-case-cases-/290783486554?pt=Motorcycles_Parts_Accessories&hash=item43b40be25a&vxp=mtr

    Now I can whittle without ripping my motor apart.
    If things don't pan out, I can still put the motor in my Royal Star as originally planned.

    The more I look at it, the more I think the cases will be fairly straightforward. The crankshaft issue will be a can-o-worms, as it needs to be longer on both ends.
    I suspect welding extensions on would be uncouth...
    Any tips about crankshafts Gentlemen?
     
  4. Ned Ludd
    Joined: May 15, 2009
    Posts: 5,052

    Ned Ludd
    Member

    [​IMG]

    An idea that has sporadically occupied my attention for ages:
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    and a rather incomplete 2F0T investigation:
    [​IMG]
     
  5. Ned Ludd
    Joined: May 15, 2009
    Posts: 5,052

    Ned Ludd
    Member

    The small Georges Irat were 1100cc FWD sports cars on the Amilcar-ward boundaries of cyclecardom. They did develop a microcar after
    WWII:
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    "La Voiture de Bled"
     
  6. bobadame
    Joined: Jan 20, 2009
    Posts: 174

    bobadame
    Member

    I like the Jag. This thread could get dangerous.
     
  7. Hardhatz
    Joined: Jun 28, 2009
    Posts: 24

    Hardhatz
    Member

    Ever so pretty, but heavy heavy heavy...

    When I swapped a SBC into my JC6C it lost so much weight that I could not even jar it off the stops by jumping on the front bumper. It looked like it had no motor at all!
     
  8. bobadame
    Joined: Jan 20, 2009
    Posts: 174

    bobadame
    Member

    So stiffer springs. The concept seems more about style than practicality. And those Jag engines are beautiful.
     
  9. Hardhatz
    Joined: Jun 28, 2009
    Posts: 24

    Hardhatz
    Member

  10. Ned Ludd
    Joined: May 15, 2009
    Posts: 5,052

    Ned Ludd
    Member

  11. onelung
    Joined: Feb 19, 2010
    Posts: 181

    onelung
    Member
    from Adelaide

  12. banjeaux bob
    Joined: Aug 31, 2008
    Posts: 6,639

    banjeaux bob
    Member
    from alaska

    Attached Files:

  13. bobadame
    Joined: Jan 20, 2009
    Posts: 174

    bobadame
    Member

  14. Rootie Kazoootie
    Joined: Nov 27, 2006
    Posts: 8,134

    Rootie Kazoootie
    Member
    from Colorado

    You might want to prowl around some of the homebuilt aircraft sites. They often use small auto/mc motors in their builds and do re-drives for the props. I suspect crankshaft modifications would be part and parcel of something like that.
     
  15. banjeaux bob
    Joined: Aug 31, 2008
    Posts: 6,639

    banjeaux bob
    Member
    from alaska

    A milestone today.... 1/2 million reads to this thread!
     
  16. ninosdad
    Joined: Aug 12, 2012
    Posts: 102

    ninosdad
    Member

  17. Ned Ludd
    Joined: May 15, 2009
    Posts: 5,052

    Ned Ludd
    Member

    Much the same sort of thing as the new Morgan three-wheeler. The combination seems a natural. Pity both are fuel-injected, though.
     
  18. The37Kid
    Joined: Apr 30, 2004
    Posts: 30,793

    The37Kid
    Member

    Congratulations to everyone who has added to this thread, I can always make room for a cyclecar, if one shows up. Bob :)
     
  19. blowby
    Joined: Dec 27, 2012
    Posts: 8,661

    blowby
    Member
    from Nicasio Ca

  20. banjeaux bob
    Joined: Aug 31, 2008
    Posts: 6,639

    banjeaux bob
    Member
    from alaska

    Looks almost like Luke Skywalker's little speeder...
     
  21. Hardhatz
    Joined: Jun 28, 2009
    Posts: 24

    Hardhatz
    Member

  22. Ned Ludd
    Joined: May 15, 2009
    Posts: 5,052

    Ned Ludd
    Member

  23. Airhead Roadster
    Joined: Sep 26, 2012
    Posts: 106

    Airhead Roadster
    Member

    I am currently stuck in neutral on my Airhead Roadster project due to my desire to keep the floor and seat height as low as possible without having the driveshaft run up and through my legs :( I have been studying the rules and guidelines of driveshaft geometry like crazy, but have been unable to come up with an acceptable solution. The main problem is the output height of the transmission and my desire to keep the rear of the driveshaft under the floor and on plane with the frame rails. I have a pile of parts, but can't seem to figure a way to make it all work. Anyone have experience in this department? Anyone familiar with broken back geometry, specifically with multi-piece shafts? How about Double Cardan joints with 2 or 3 piece shafts? Help, this part of my build is driveshafting me crazy!
     
  24. Hardhatz
    Joined: Jun 28, 2009
    Posts: 24

    Hardhatz
    Member

    You could offset the pumpkin to the right, that would get you 1/2 way there.

    For the front, take a look at the 3-element universals used in old Fords with enclosed drive.
    Or, study the 62 Tempest drive.

    Perhaps an IRS VW beetle CV, although I do not know whether CVs are RPM-friendly...

    I think I'd run an offset at the front. Something like a small 4x4 transfer case?

    Better yet, you could fab your own with aluminum plates & a Harley final drive belt. In fact, I guess you could do that at both ends... Rather more efficient & smooth than high-angle U-joints I suspect. :)

    (I made a drawing in Word, but cannot figure out how to post it here... :[ )
     
    Last edited: Mar 8, 2013
  25. Hardhatz
    Joined: Jun 28, 2009
    Posts: 24

    Hardhatz
    Member

  26. bobadame
    Joined: Jan 20, 2009
    Posts: 174

    bobadame
    Member

    I used sort of a hybrid drive shaft in my Dwarf car. The 2 piece drive shaft ran along the right side of the car. The second shaft was held between a couple of pillow blocks with a sprocket at the end. On the input shaft of the differential I had another sprocket, then of course a roller chain between the sprockets. The chain ran right behind the seat. Worked ok for a season and a half of circle track racing and a bunch of autocross. For the new incarnation of the car I just ran the drive shaft at about a 6 degree angle from point a to point b. I raised the seat height about 7" to clear the shaft. Had to make a compromise to keep the project moving.
     
  27. Ned Ludd
    Joined: May 15, 2009
    Posts: 5,052

    Ned Ludd
    Member

    Introducing a chain somewhere creates all kinds of possibilities.

    The Hardhatz method lets you put the drive shaft wherever you want. In a live axle situation the rear chain could have sprockets coincident with a Panhard bar, which would eliminate any tension issues.

    The bobadame method is more limited in drive shaft location, but you save one chain. The obvious permutation is to have a short chain off the gearbox output driving over to the centre of the car, so the driveshaft can run between the seats straight to the final drive.
     
  28. Airhead Roadster
    Joined: Sep 26, 2012
    Posts: 106

    Airhead Roadster
    Member

    Thanks for your input Hardhatz. You may be onto something with the transfer case idea. I thought about that last night thinking back to my flat bottom VDrive boating days and realized some sort of plane relocation box with a an Input on top of one side and an Output on the bottom of the other would solve all my issues. Then I remembered seeing this product a while back. Same idea really.

    http://www.speedwaymotors.com/Steer-Clear-Steering-Box-Drop-Brushed-Finish,6254.html

    The one drawing I found of a Tempest driveline certainly resembles some of the angles I'm working with. I could do a 3 piece and point the pinion down, but the output Ujoint at the transmission would have a severe angle. Most everything I have read says that the output Ujoint needs to be in the 1-3 DEG range to the transmission plane and that with a 3 piece shaft, the pinion angle needs to be parallel to the center section of the shaft. However on a shaft driven motorcycle, the Ujoint at the output is almost always in some sort of bind as the suspension moves up and down and they seem to stand up to the abuse of severe angles.

    And thanks for your input as well bobadame. I may have to give up and go with a traditional 2 joint single shaft, but I'm not quite ready to do that yet. Projects like this are always about compromises. I knew from the start this would be one of the more challenging aspects of the build. At least when I get to the body part I'll be able to beat out some of my aggression!

    It just occurred to me that maybe this isn't the appropriate place to discuss my build challenges. What do you guys think? I just figured you guys have probably seen a lot of interesting non-traditional setups out there and might be able to help. I can start a new thread of my own if that would be better. Hopefully I can get this solved and move on with the build.
     
    Last edited: Mar 9, 2013
  29. Rootie Kazoootie
    Joined: Nov 27, 2006
    Posts: 8,134

    Rootie Kazoootie
    Member
    from Colorado

    Suzuki Samurai's use a very small, lightweight divorced transfer box. They are designed to operate offset opposite from what you want, but I would think it could be flipped over no problem. Might be worth a look.
     

    Attached Files:

  30. bobadame
    Joined: Jan 20, 2009
    Posts: 174

    bobadame
    Member

    It just occured to me that my old Guzzi uses a double universal joint just behind the transmission. I suppose that other shaft drive bikes do as well. Something like that might work for you. Rock crawler trucks use some extreme angles in their shafts but their speeds are mostly so slow that they can get away with it. They do talk about constant velocity joints in some cases. I understand that the Ford Explorer uses something unusual in their front shaft. Might be an idea there.

    As far as a build thread goes, I'm new here so I asked the same question when I introduced my project. The concensus was that I should start a separate build thread. I for one would very interested in reading a lot more about your project.
    These cyclecars are sort of a bastard child and this thread seems to be a welcome exception on this HAMB board. I don't know of another place to exchange ideas about them. Is there?
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.