Register now to get rid of these ads!

I have a lead on a 1967 500 caddy engine

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by mrconcdid, Jul 9, 2012.

  1. mrconcdid
    Joined: Aug 31, 2010
    Posts: 1,156

    mrconcdid
    Member
    from Florida

    As the title states, I have a lead on a 1967 caddy convertible with a 500 engine, the man tells me he has a couple other caddys and engines to pick from.

    Aside from hearing them run and he's says some do run, how can I tell between a 500 and a 472? I currantly have a 368 in my 53, and since its a bolt in swap, I am looking for a 500 to build up.

    What are some of the things to look out for in this engine? He has mentioned the script "cadillac" on the valve covers.



    Thanks
    Godspeed
    MrC.
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Jul 9, 2012
  2. hippy killer
    Joined: Jan 11, 2011
    Posts: 210

    hippy killer
    Member

    76 is low horse power you would be better of with an earlier one I have a 69 472 and a later 500 the don't have script on the valve covers I could be wrong but I done think the made the 472 after73
     
  3. slammed
    Joined: Jun 10, 2004
    Posts: 8,150

    slammed
    Member

    The mainstay of 500 cubes is the torque. The '76 will run on low octane unleaded all day. It has been documented that the sure fire way of 500/472 is to pull the pan. Either motor as you can imagine will move the weight. And a few dress up items will have looking as good. And if you do it, someone say's 'why a 500 Cad?' 'Cause it's not a 350 chevy....
     
  4. Bolt-in swap? You'd need the trans with it and I'm sure that's not a bolt-in.

    472 was made through '74; 75-76 all were 500s, then in '77 it became a 425. 500 wasn't introduced until 1970 and was standard in Eldorado.

    Cadillac had a habit of stamping the car VIN on the block so it may be possible in some instances to determine what car the motor came in and give some indication of whether or not it's a 500.
     
    Last edited: Jul 9, 2012

  5. Dane
    Joined: May 6, 2010
    Posts: 1,351

    Dane
    Member
    from Soquel, CA

  6. drptop70ss
    Joined: May 31, 2010
    Posts: 1,201

    drptop70ss
    Member
    from NY

    If it is the factory engine it is a 429, no 472s until 1968. I have a 472 in my 67 cadillac, very different looking engine than the 429. The 429 will have the script valve covers.
     
  7. john walker
    Joined: Sep 11, 2008
    Posts: 1,137

    john walker
    Member

    ain't no bolt in swap. oil pump/filter interferes with the crossmember. steering box clearance issues, engine length issues.
     
  8. hippy killer
    Joined: Jan 11, 2011
    Posts: 210

    hippy killer
    Member

    I'm doing the 472 th400 in my 51 cad as we speak recently not bolt in

    Rustynewyorker thanks the info
     
    Last edited: Jul 15, 2012
  9. mrconcdid
    Joined: Aug 31, 2010
    Posts: 1,156

    mrconcdid
    Member
    from Florida

    I was told the 368 shares the same block as the 472/500, therefore it would be a bolt in swap to my mounts and trans (turbo 400), I have been sent information today that states the 500 was made only in years 1970-1976 so this must not be one. and the only way to tell them apart (500/472) is the look at the crank casting numbers. Only 1970 had 10to1 compression and all other years had 8.5 with lower horsepower numbers.

    Seems he doesn't know what he has, Im glad I do, thanks for the information


    <TABLE class=wikitable><TBODY><TR><TH>Year</TH><TH>Engine Vin Code</TH><TH>Engine Letter Code</TH><TH>Cubic Inch</TH><TH>Rated Horsepower</TH><TH>Rated Torque</TH><TH>Bore & Stroke</TH><TH>Compression Ratio</TH><TH>Oil PressurePSI

    </TH></TR><TR><TD>1968–1969</TD><TD>None</TD><TD>None</TD><TD>472</TD><TD>375 hp (280 kW) @ 4400 rpm</TD><TD>525 lb·ft (712 N·m) @ 3000 rpm</TD><TD>4.300 X 4.060</TD><TD>10.5:1</TD><TD>33</TD></TR><TR><TD>1970</TD><TD>None</TD><TD>None</TD><TD>472</TD><TD>375 hp (280 kW) @ 4400 rpm</TD><TD>525 lb·ft (712 N·m) @ 3000 rpm</TD><TD>4.300 X 4.060</TD><TD>10.0:1</TD><TD>35-40</TD></TR><TR><TD>1970</TD><TD>None</TD><TD>None</TD><TD>500</TD><TD>400 hp (298 kW) @ 4400 rpm</TD><TD>550 lb·ft (750 N·m) @ 3000 rpm</TD><TD>4.300 X 4.304</TD><TD>10.0:1</TD><TD>35-40</TD></TR><TR><TD>1971</TD><TD>R</TD><TD>61E,Q</TD><TD>472</TD><TD>345 hp (257 kW) @ 4400 rpm</TD><TD>500 lb·ft (680 N·m) @ 2800 rpm</TD><TD>4.300 X 4.060</TD><TD>8.5:1</TD><TD>35-40</TD></TR><TR><TD>1971</TD><TD>S</TD><TD>61E,Q</TD><TD>500</TD><TD>365 hp (272 kW) @ 4400 rpm</TD><TD>535 lb·ft (725 N·m) @ 2800 rpm</TD><TD>4.300 X 4.304</TD><TD>8.5:1</TD><TD>35-40</TD></TR><TR><TD>1972</TD><TD>R</TD><TD>62E,Q</TD><TD>472</TD><TD>220 hp (164 kW) @ 4400 rpm</TD><TD>365 lb·ft (495 N·m) @ 2400 rpm</TD><TD>4.300 X 4.060</TD><TD>8.5:1</TD><TD>35</TD></TR><TR><TD>1972</TD><TD>S</TD><TD>62E,Q</TD><TD>500</TD><TD>235 hp (175 kW) @ 4400 rpm</TD><TD>385 lb·ft (522 N·m) @ 2400 rpm</TD><TD>4.300 X 4.304</TD><TD>8.5:1</TD><TD>35</TD></TR><TR><TD>1973</TD><TD>R</TD><TD>63E,Q</TD><TD>472</TD><TD>220 hp (164 kW) @ 4400 rpm</TD><TD>365 lb·ft (495 N·m) @ 2400 rpm</TD><TD>4.300 X 4.060</TD><TD>8.5:1</TD><TD>35</TD></TR><TR><TD>1973</TD><TD>S</TD><TD>63E,Q</TD><TD>500</TD><TD>235 hp (175 kW) @ 4400 rpm</TD><TD>385 lb·ft (522 N·m) @ 2400 rpm</TD><TD>4.300 X 4.304</TD><TD>8.5:1</TD><TD>35</TD></TR><TR><TD>1974</TD><TD>R</TD><TD>64E,Q</TD><TD>472</TD><TD>205 hp (153 kW) @ 4400 rpm</TD><TD>380 lb·ft (520 N·m) @ 2400 rpm</TD><TD>4.300 X 4.060</TD><TD>8.5:1</TD><TD>35</TD></TR><TR><TD>1974</TD><TD>S</TD><TD>64E,Q</TD><TD>500</TD><TD>210 hp (157 kW) @ 3600 rpm</TD><TD>380 lb·ft (520 N·m) @ 2000 rpm</TD><TD>4.300 X 4.304</TD><TD>8.5:1</TD><TD>35</TD></TR><TR><TD>1975</TD><TD>S</TD><TD>65E,Q</TD><TD>500</TD><TD>210 hp (157 kW) @ 3600 rpm</TD><TD>380 lb·ft (520 N·m) @ 2000 rpm</TD><TD>4.300 X 4.304</TD><TD>8.5:1</TD><TD>35</TD></TR><TR><TD>1976</TD><TD>S</TD><TD>66E,Q</TD><TD>500</TD><TD>190 hp (142 kW) @ 3600 rpm</TD><TD>360 lb·ft (490 N·m) @ 2000 rpm</TD><TD>4.300 X 4.304</TD><TD>8.5:1</TD><TD>35</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
     
  10. 40FordGuy
    Joined: Mar 24, 2008
    Posts: 2,907

    40FordGuy
    Member

    Great engines,..... Enough torque to do just about anything you want it to !!! The only one I saw go bad was ran out of oil on a freeway. I believe they put the turbo 400 behind those...

    4TTRUK
     
  11. drptop70ss
    Joined: May 31, 2010
    Posts: 1,201

    drptop70ss
    Member
    from NY

    472/500 bolts up to factory mounts up front but has a different bellhousing pattern than the 429, so it will not bolt up to a TH400 from a 429. My 472 fits fine, plenty of room, just very different looking engine than the 429.
     
  12. Hnstray
    Joined: Aug 23, 2009
    Posts: 12,355

    Hnstray
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Quincy, IL

    To determine if an engine is a 472 or 500, pull a spark plug, insert a length of rod or small diameter tubing, rotate the crank to BDC or TDC, mark the rod,tube, whatever, at the top of the spark plug hole and continue to rotate to the opposite of where you started, mark the rod again, withdraw, measure the distance between the marks......equals stroke of course. The 500 has .300 greater stroke than a 472. You'll have to research the actual stroke as I don't have that in my memory bank as I type this.

    Ray
     
  13. I want the 368 for our '34 coupe project!!!
     
  14. were selling a 71 500
     
  15. Engine man
    Joined: Jan 30, 2011
    Posts: 3,480

    Engine man
    Member
    from Wisconsin

    See post 9.

    1970 500 is the one everybody wanted.
     
  16. Dangerous Dan
    Joined: Jul 10, 2011
    Posts: 480

    Dangerous Dan
    Member

    The reason for the big HP diff. on the 8.5 comp engines is because in the early 70's they changed the way the rate them. They are easy to wake up with just a cam and valve springs. If you have the cash the Eldo, aluminum manifold will give you a few ponies but there is nothing wrong with the stock manifold, and a good 800 cfm carb with stock exhaust manifolds will amaze you and all below 4800 rpm. By the way they only weigh about 35 LBS. more than a SBC. and are only about 1 1/2 inches bigger in all directions.



    I have two 500 Cads that I want to move, one with turbo 400.
     
  17. Gator
    Joined: Dec 29, 2005
    Posts: 4,016

    Gator
    Member

    I don't even know where to start...

    Try Maximum Torque Specialties site, plenty of good ( and correct) info:

    http://www.500cid.com/
     
  18. outlaw256
    Joined: Jun 26, 2008
    Posts: 2,022

    outlaw256
    Member

    we have a 68 472 sitting in the floor waiting for something.if you want go fast goodies contaic the cad. company. on a old add they had out they had a full size 2dr cad.im guessing here but it was about 68 -70, dont remember for sure, anyway this thing was leaving the line with both wheels in the air.thats all they deal with.472-500.
     
  19. King Karl
    Joined: Sep 27, 2007
    Posts: 383

    King Karl
    Member
    from N.C.

    This will tell you everything you need to know.
    I just picked up a 1968 472 tonight. Pull the valve cover to check the head numbers and check the block number on the rear of the block. I printed this off and took it with me.

    http://www.cad500parts.com/tech/EngineIDPages.pdf
     
  20. My book is goofy in that some years it doesn't have detailed engine specs, and I didn't have a Motors manual handy to cross check.
     
  21. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 33,986

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Unless it is just a hulk a 67 Caddy ragtop is probably worth a hell of a lot more as a whole car for someone's project than it is as a doner rig.

    And as the others said it won't have a 500 in it anyhow.
     
  22. 37RAT
    Joined: Dec 7, 2006
    Posts: 145

    37RAT
    Member
    from Wisconsin

    I believe the stoke on the 500 is 4 1/4" as compared to the 472 at 4 1/16? 1970 was the best year for the 500 ci. Eldorado's=400HP and 525 Fp Torque from the factory--
     
  23. Sphynx
    Joined: Jan 31, 2009
    Posts: 1,141

    Sphynx
    Member
    from Central Fl

    We have run them on airboats and they are torque monsters. I have a edelbrock intake, cam, and a set of valve springs in tje garage from a boat my brother built then sold before they made it to the engine. I believe there is a company called Potter that makes aluminum heads and many other parts for the 472/500.
     
  24. CutawayAl
    Joined: Aug 3, 2009
    Posts: 2,144

    CutawayAl
    Member
    from MI

    What he said.^
     
  25. The Continental
    Joined: Aug 23, 2011
    Posts: 363

    The Continental
    Member
    from Texas

    What kind of shape is this convertible in? Either way if it has a 500 it wouldn't be the original motor.
     
  26. mrconcdid
    Joined: Aug 31, 2010
    Posts: 1,156

    mrconcdid
    Member
    from Florida

    Well heres what I found out.
    It is a 67 cadillac with a 429 ( script valve covers )

    BUT he also has a complete 1970 cadillac with a 472 in it, and it says so on the core support, going by the info here it would be a 10 to 1 motor. I did not buy it (yet) and the kicker is he wants scrap price for the car, it has just over 130k miles on the clock, the car is rusted pretty bad.

    So heres my delima
    Keep my pefectly running 368 ( 40k miles) installed and needs nothing.
    add a cam and lifters and make some headers. try to get a few extra ponies out
    of what I have.

    Or

    Buy the 472 freshin it up $$$ and make a real street bruiser out of my little 53.

    That is where Im at today, If I bought the 472 now it would be awhile before I could afford to freshin' it up.

    Godspeed
    MrC.
     
  27. 73RR
    Joined: Jan 29, 2007
    Posts: 7,205

    73RR
    Member

    For the price of the cam-lifters and headers you could freshen up the 472...but you might then need a new rear axle....:D

    .
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.