Register now to get rid of these ads!

shock geometry

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by 57 3100, May 30, 2011.

  1. 57 3100
    Joined: Apr 9, 2010
    Posts: 344

    57 3100
    Member

    guys,
    on my chevy 1957 3100 truck, i am currently running my exhaust with dumps just before the rear axle, but soon want to get a new full system that will go up over the rear axle and dump after the rear tire.

    because my truck is so low, my shocks are in the way. i will need to move the shocks from their factory top mounting points, and need to run them straight up and down. i had a few race cars back in the day with the shocks mounted like this, but am curious how it will handle on the streets ? i dont do any high speed cornering or anything like that, but what are your thoughts on me making that change to the shock mounting ?

    thanks guys.

    leonard
     
  2. harley man
    Joined: Jan 24, 2009
    Posts: 152

    harley man
    Member

    Straight up and down is best.
     
  3. FastAndLoose
    Joined: Jan 31, 2009
    Posts: 206

    FastAndLoose
    Member
    from Warren, PA

    The only difference that the angle makes is on roll resistance during cornering... you'll be fine.
     
  4. mgtstumpy
    Joined: Jul 20, 2006
    Posts: 9,214

    mgtstumpy
    Member

    Shock absorber efficiency is directly related to shock angle, the further out they mount and closer to the wheel, the more effective they are. Canted shocks provide lateral stability. IT's all a bit of a compromise.

    Ideally a shock will be at 1/3 downwards travel at rest. Perpendicular is 100% efficient (Stiff), mount them at 45 degrees and they are only 50% efficient (Soft).

    Staggering shocks, fore and aft controls differential wrap and axle hop under acceleration and braking, one shock is compressing whilst the other is extending. 30 degrees is the practical maximum (Canted) angle.
     

    Attached Files:


  5. 57 3100
    Joined: Apr 9, 2010
    Posts: 344

    57 3100
    Member

    thanks for the info guys.... i am gonna fab up some new upper mounts, and get them straight up and down, and see what happens....

    leonard
     
  6. dan sutton
    Joined: Oct 21, 2008
    Posts: 196

    dan sutton
    Member

    I just changed my rear mounting on my '48 from vertical to angled (I had to remove to tailpipe to get them angled) and saw no difference in the ride and cornering, so I re-installed them vertical and re-installed the exhaust. Seems to be fine like that.
     
  7. 57 3100
    Joined: Apr 9, 2010
    Posts: 344

    57 3100
    Member

    thanks man.... yea, i have since installed my fabbed up brackets and are running my rear shocks vertical. i gained the needed room to run my tail pipes up and over the rear axle.
    here is a pic of my new shock setup, but i took the cheap gabriel shocks out and installed nitrogen gas shocks, since i only have 1" of travel before hitting the frame.
    i dont have any pics of the new exhaust system yet.. thanks again.

    leonard

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  8. dan sutton
    Joined: Oct 21, 2008
    Posts: 196

    dan sutton
    Member

    That's a similar set-up to mine
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.