Register now to get rid of these ads!

Is this a 1932 Ford transmission?...

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by 3wLarry, May 25, 2011.

  1. 3wLarry
    Joined: Mar 11, 2005
    Posts: 12,804

    3wLarry
    Member Emeritus
    from Owasso, Ok

    Was told it is...then someone told me it isn't...???
     

    Attached Files:

    kidcampbell71 likes this.
  2. johnny bondo
    Joined: Aug 20, 2005
    Posts: 1,547

    johnny bondo
    Member
    from illinois

  3. chaddilac
    Joined: Mar 21, 2006
    Posts: 14,021

    chaddilac
    Member

    According to your for sale thread it is!! :D
     
  4. 3wLarry
    Joined: Mar 11, 2005
    Posts: 12,804

    3wLarry
    Member Emeritus
    from Owasso, Ok

    That's why I'm trying to find out if it is or not...I don't want to mislead anyone.
     
    kidcampbell71 likes this.

  5. chaddilac
    Joined: Mar 21, 2006
    Posts: 14,021

    chaddilac
    Member

    I was just messin' Larry... I was going to paste your thread url in there and tell you to match it up to the photos!! :D
     
  6. Will Kimble
    Joined: Feb 12, 2007
    Posts: 401

    Will Kimble
    Member

    Well it looks like a '32 handbrake & ratchet, and the shift tower looks right for '32. Case looks like for a Model B 4 cylinder. Rear mount is not '32, maybe '37-39? Looks like somebody already snarked the clutch arm...
     
  7. 3wLarry
    Joined: Mar 11, 2005
    Posts: 12,804

    3wLarry
    Member Emeritus
    from Owasso, Ok

    'splain "snarked the clutch arm"
     
    kidcampbell71 likes this.
  8. Will Kimble
    Joined: Feb 12, 2007
    Posts: 401

    Will Kimble
    Member

    Looks like the clutch arm is gone. Should be a long, slender thing. It was one year only of course, and one of two pieces - including the original rear mount - that I would want off a '32 B transmission.

    Will
     
  9. The case looks right and the early shifter has the correct slight curve but the rear support isn't right for a 32.HRP
     
    Last edited: May 25, 2011
  10. titus
    Joined: Dec 6, 2003
    Posts: 5,145

    titus
    Member

    someone probably stuck a B motor in a 37-41 ish ford, that would explain the different rear mount, they all interechange off the back of the trans anyways.
     
  11. phlip
    Joined: Jan 8, 2007
    Posts: 185

    phlip
    Member

  12. hotcoupe
    Joined: Oct 3, 2007
    Posts: 599

    hotcoupe
    Member

    the number that is stamped on the case near the inspection whole will indicate the year of manufacture.
     
  13. Yep, 1932 4 banger trans. Has a new rear mount, but with that tower yes it is a 32
     
  14. -Brent-
    Joined: Nov 20, 2006
    Posts: 7,367

    -Brent-
    Member

    3W... doesn't know his thirty-two parts? Tisk tisk... :D
     
  15. 3wLarry
    Joined: Mar 11, 2005
    Posts: 12,804

    3wLarry
    Member Emeritus
    from Owasso, Ok

    I knew you would know...:) Thanks, man.
     
    kidcampbell71 likes this.
  16. 3wLarry
    Joined: Mar 11, 2005
    Posts: 12,804

    3wLarry
    Member Emeritus
    from Owasso, Ok

    Hush up, you...
     
    kidcampbell71 likes this.
  17. Bruce Lancaster
    Joined: Oct 9, 2001
    Posts: 21,681

    Bruce Lancaster
    Member Emeritus

    Serial would be on the NEXT layer, a piece betwixt trans and block on B.
    Top '32 for sure...case used '33-4 too, but with a couple added notches that I do not see on yours...so all is '32 except rear mount.
    Clutch arm is a big chunk of value, very expensive now.

    See this site: http://www.fordgarage.com/ and find your way to actual pics of the difference between B castings, '32 and '33-4!
     
  18. 3wLarry
    Joined: Mar 11, 2005
    Posts: 12,804

    3wLarry
    Member Emeritus
    from Owasso, Ok

    Thanks Bruce :)
     
    kidcampbell71 likes this.
  19. This would be true for a V8 but the 4 cylinder cars had the number stamped into a boss located on the flywheel housing (the piece between the transmission and the engine).

    Charlie Stephens
     
  20. truckncoupe
    Joined: Apr 4, 2009
    Posts: 1,428

    truckncoupe
    Member

    I don't know Larry ? Looks like a LATE MODEL PINTO TRANSMISSION!:D
     
  21. rusty bill
    Joined: Oct 7, 2010
    Posts: 242

    rusty bill
    Member

    Bruce is correct!
     
  22. Smokin Joe
    Joined: Mar 19, 2002
    Posts: 3,770

    Smokin Joe
    Member

    Henry never missed a chance to use up inventory. They'd use up all the stuff from the previous year before starting on the new stuff and if next year's parts started comming in they'd use those too if they were closer than the correct parts to the production line and they'd do the job. Bottom line for them was if it's handy and it fits, use it, don't hold up the line. Not saying that's what happened here but something to keep in mind when looking at old Ford stuff.

    The other half of this is there have been lots of mechanics and hot rodders over all those years to swap parts together to meet what they need.
     
  23. deucegarage
    Joined: Nov 6, 2008
    Posts: 38

    deucegarage
    Member

    1932 case (not 33-34)
    1932 Hand brake
    1932 Shift Tower (not later)
    post-1936 rear main bearing retainer.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.