Register now to get rid of these ads!

What is a more traditional engine

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by pchop51, Mar 10, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. pchop51
    Joined: Apr 28, 2008
    Posts: 50

    pchop51
    Member
    from minnesota

    I need some help here guys. I was wondering what everyone thought would be a more traditional excepted engine in a late 1959 1960
    styled hotrod. I have a 1960 ford 292 y block or a 1956 sbc 265.
    I feel like the y block was not that widely use as a engine choice for hot rods. Im in the dark on this one guys any help would be great.
     
  2. handyandy289
    Joined: Sep 19, 2010
    Posts: 354

    handyandy289
    Member
    from Georgia

    Flat head, flat head, flat head
     
  3. Conrad_AZ
    Joined: Feb 8, 2008
    Posts: 38

    Conrad_AZ
    Member

    IMHO, and I am old, but not a traditional guy, but if you are going to drive it, go with the 265 over any Y block or flathead. Far more reliable and cheaper to keep running. Personally, I would use an LS6 but then again I am not traditional.
     
  4. Commodoreswab
    Joined: Feb 12, 2011
    Posts: 337

    Commodoreswab
    Member
    from West TN


  5. thunderbirdesq
    Joined: Feb 15, 2006
    Posts: 7,092

    thunderbirdesq
    Member

    Six to one, half a dozen to the other. Pick up a few littlebooks. Yblocks were VERY popular hot rod engines as were Chevy V8s in that era.
     
  6. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 8,593

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY

    Look through a pile of '59-'60 HRMs. I just happen to have the Jan and Feb '60 issues lying next to my computer, and they've got rods powered by flatheads, nailheads, hemis, Olds rockets, and 265/283s......but no Y blocks.
     
  7. stude_trucks
    Joined: Sep 13, 2007
    Posts: 4,754

    stude_trucks
    Member

    From a historical timeline point of view, it is not likely too many hot rodders would be getting a brand new '60 motor in '60 and putting it in a hot rod, but it was technically possible of course. More likely with the '56 and even more likely an even older motor.
     
  8. rustyford40
    Joined: Nov 20, 2007
    Posts: 2,168

    rustyford40
    Member
    from Mass Bay

    Forget any sbc. go with a Nail head , hemi, ,olds, caddy or y block mabye a F-E
     
  9. Listen to this man, he is smartlier!
     
  10. poncho62
    Joined: Nov 23, 2005
    Posts: 1,094

    poncho62
    BANNED

    Seems all the "traditionalists" hate the SBC,,,,but when it came out in 55 and went to 283 in 57, thats what everyone wanted,.......so, in my mind a late 50s rod would be perfect with one
     
  11. Commodoreswab
    Joined: Feb 12, 2011
    Posts: 337

    Commodoreswab
    Member
    from West TN

    I would go with a flathead but if you are asking for a choice I would go Y-block, sure the sbc would be cheaper and easier to find stuff for but there are already millions of them out there. I drove a ford with a Y-block for years with no problems at all
     
  12. 40StudeDude
    Joined: Sep 19, 2002
    Posts: 9,540

    40StudeDude
    Member

    The 265" V8 set the hot rod world on its butt when it came out in 1955...IT DOES NOT get any more traditional than that...use it.

    R-
     
  13. Commodoreswab
    Joined: Feb 12, 2011
    Posts: 337

    Commodoreswab
    Member
    from West TN

    Do you want to be "perfect" like everyone else or a bit original. My personal fav rod engine was a 40's merc flathead twin spark with centrifugal charger on top, the car was a 32 roadster and it was original
     
  14. if its a late hot rod run a y block
     
  15. poofus1929
    Joined: Jan 29, 2008
    Posts: 897

    poofus1929
    Member
    from So Cal

    I just purchased the complete year of HotRod Magazine for 1961 and I have looked through every copy. There are a lot of sbc powered cars and quite a few sbc powered dragsters in those issues. There were a couple of y block cars and flatties, but the majority were chevy and olds powered. I hope this helps a little.
     
  16. thunderbirdesq
    Joined: Feb 15, 2006
    Posts: 7,092

    thunderbirdesq
    Member

    Not to advocate one over the other, because I personally think either engine would be a fine choice, but here's a cover shot of the late great Doane Spencer dropping a hopped up 312 into a '40. Traditional enough for ya?:rolleyes:
     

    Attached Files:

    • ds.jpg
      ds.jpg
      File size:
      101.3 KB
      Views:
      231
  17. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,341

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

  18. Fenders
    Joined: Sep 8, 2007
    Posts: 3,921

    Fenders
    Member

    It is very important that you use the engine everyone else approves of.
    Never mind what you like, or want, or have....
    And since the overwhelming choice of others is the SBC, for many good reasons (easy to find parts, shorter length, lower cost, etc) you should really go with the SBC.
    Remember, build what they like, not what you like.
    Be traditional.
     
  19. badshifter
    Joined: Apr 28, 2006
    Posts: 3,538

    badshifter
    Member

    I think the traditionalists hate the 350, HEI, block huggers etc. Pretty hard to hate on a 265. Then again maybe I'm biased because I've got a 40 k mile original 265 just waiting to go into the next project..... Y Block is cool, but the 265 gets my vote.
     
  20. Commodoreswab
    Joined: Feb 12, 2011
    Posts: 337

    Commodoreswab
    Member
    from West TN

    If this helps sway you decision are you going for something put together on a budget (flathead) or something where money was no option back then, something that would get featured in a magazine?
     
  21. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,341

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC


    Your right of course. But most guys cant tell the difference between a 350 and a 265. There was a thread on this a while back when a guy got all pissy because he found out an oil-fill tube in the intake wouldn't make his 350 pass for a 265.:eek:
     
  22. I see MR "lets give an SBC thread one star" was here. Doofus
     
  23. I was 13 years old when the SBC came out. Every car nut of every genre wanted one. The wrecking yards sold them as fast as they came in. By the time I was 16 and building my first Model A coupe the flat head was well on its way out. I could not afford a SBC but lusted after one. So I used a running flathead that I bought for 15 bucks. The guy I sold it to when I joined the Army in 1960 swapped in a SBC. The coupe I am building now has a 283. At 67 I am finally getting what I really wanted. What do you really want?
     
  24. Chuckles Garage
    Joined: Jun 10, 2006
    Posts: 2,365

    Chuckles Garage
    Alliance Vendor

  25. i just pulled a sbc out of my 29 to put a flathead so i think its what you like...
     
  26. Henry VIII
    Joined: Mar 30, 2009
    Posts: 272

    Henry VIII
    Member
    from Tulsa OK

    I was in high school those years. For those who could afford it the 283 SBC was the engine of choice. I got really tired of 265's and 283's kicking the hell out of my flatheads. A few years later I had a 292 then a 312 Y block in a Mercury that was pretty good but still could not handle a 283. Flatheads and Y blocks have grown in popularity more recently because folks have become tired of seeing so many SBC's in hot rods. In fact when I'm at a hot rod show I usually look for something different but "old school" because they are more interesting. But I chose a 350 crate motor for what I drive.
     
  27. JeffreyJames
    Joined: Jun 13, 2007
    Posts: 16,628

    JeffreyJames
    Member
    from SUGAR CITY

    I like Y-Blocks for sure and they were definitely used but my heart lies with 265's and 283 Chevys. They are just plain old fucking cool and I love that I can look at any magazine from 55-62 and see tons of examples to support my decision.

    Here's the one I have in my '35.....
    [​IMG]
     

    Attached Files:

  28. pchop51
    Joined: Apr 28, 2008
    Posts: 50

    pchop51
    Member
    from minnesota

    31 model A
     
  29. teddyp
    Joined: May 28, 2006
    Posts: 3,197

    teddyp
    Member

    for me it,s a toss up since i run a sbc.s in my 50 chevy coupe and a y-block in my 58 ford but that,s cuase i like both the sbc chevy is the motor of choice when i was a kid in the early 60,s but you can,t beat the sound of a y-block with a set of glass packs you have to make the choice both would be right
     
  30. fiveohnick2932
    Joined: Mar 29, 2006
    Posts: 916

    fiveohnick2932
    Member
    from Napa, Ca.

    First of all flatheads were not as "hot" in the late 50's -60's as the overhead motors available. Y blocks were very popular then and I would defiantly go with one in your rod. Dont let anyone tell you that a 292 Y block is not as reliable as a 265 SBC. If you want your car to be low on power and boring go with the 265, if you want good power and lots of torque with a unique era correct motor that people will want to look at use the Y block!
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.