Register now to get rid of these ads!

MII suspension on CE crossmember

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by hinklejd, Feb 10, 2011.

  1. hinklejd
    Joined: Jan 20, 2010
    Posts: 146

    hinklejd
    Member
    from Fort Worth

    I'm working on a '48 Chevy Fleetline that I want to build as cruiser, not for sport driving or anything like that. I've already pulled the body from the frame and stripped and repainted the frame. I wanted to update the suspension so I looked around for MII crossmember options. I chose the Chassis Engineering due to the same mounting method as the original installation (i.e. Bolt on). Now I'm up to the point where it's time to complete the front suspension. I have been looking at the Speedway Motors MII suspension kit with the air ride, and I wanted to get your opinions. I have already read about SM's reputation regarding customer service. I am wanting opinions and facts; first, will the SM MII kit fit the CE crossmember? Are there better options for installing air suspension on the MII crossmember?

    Thanks
    -J
     
  2. davidbistolas
    Joined: May 21, 2010
    Posts: 960

    davidbistolas
    Member

    I'm not clear on which speedway kit you're lookin' at... can you post a link?

    I used the CE crossmember on my '51- with heidts front end stuff. No bags though
     
  3. hinklejd
    Joined: Jan 20, 2010
    Posts: 146

    hinklejd
    Member
    from Fort Worth

  4. treb11
    Joined: Jan 21, 2006
    Posts: 3,958

    treb11
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    thats a lot of $$ for stamped steel arms
     

  5. hinklejd
    Joined: Jan 20, 2010
    Posts: 146

    hinklejd
    Member
    from Fort Worth

    I understand that SM is wanting a lot of money for their kit, and that's one of the reasons I'm asking for opinions. If there is a better value available, then I'm willing to hear other options.
     
  6. millersgarage
    Joined: Jun 23, 2009
    Posts: 2,296

    millersgarage
    Member

    I have stock arms, springs, knuckles, etc on the bolt in C.E. crossmember on my '48 ford. I figured there was no reason to pay the big money for tubular arms that no one would ever be able to see.

    I am not running air ride.

    I scrounged most of the parts from other peoples cast offs, and got some things new (springs, shocks) I kept the lower strut rod arms, and the car rides like a dream.
     
  7. ratrodjunkie
    Joined: Aug 21, 2005
    Posts: 45

    ratrodjunkie
    Member

    I ordered my CE mustang II and control arms and brakes ,etc.. from JPL Street Rods. Really good prices and good customer service. The control arms I got from them were TCI.
     
    Last edited: Feb 10, 2011
  8. hinklejd
    Joined: Jan 20, 2010
    Posts: 146

    hinklejd
    Member
    from Fort Worth

    I'm with you, miller. If the system works well with the strut rods, then I don't see a good reason to change it. The tubular a-arm kits seem to be a solution in search of a problem, especially on a fat-fender car.

    ratrodjunkie, do you have any contact information for JPL streetrods? All I could find was an evilbay store and a nut shop in PA. Thanks in advance.
     
  9. ratrodjunkie
    Joined: Aug 21, 2005
    Posts: 45

    ratrodjunkie
    Member

    The ebay store has their phone number on it. You can call and talk to them directly and buy stuff without going thru ebay.
     
  10. I just placed a HUGE order of C.E. stuff from JPL, complete front end, sway bars , rear springs and motor&trans mount. I payed with a cashiers check so they didn't get whacked a 3 or 4% form the credit card company. I saved over $400. from the C.E. catalog prices and FREE shipping. Can't beat that. Todd
     
  11. davidbistolas
    Joined: May 21, 2010
    Posts: 960

    davidbistolas
    Member

    Last edited: Feb 12, 2011
  12. davidbistolas
    Joined: May 21, 2010
    Posts: 960

    davidbistolas
    Member

    :D Ah I stand corrected. The '49-'54 kit uses the wide tubular lower arms... other kits can use the stamped factorystyle arms.
     
  13. chevyfordman
    Joined: Oct 4, 2008
    Posts: 1,358

    chevyfordman
    Member

    I used the ce crossmember also on my 48 chevy with the longer jw garage tubular a arms. The ce sway bars don't fit without some work, I would eliminate the front sway bar as I ran for awhile without it when trying to get something working. The sway bar comes with instructions that state it may not work. The car cornered just the same without it, so that will save you some money. I feel the a arms work easier without the strut rod and the old original style a arms plus its a cleaner looking setup. JW garage brake pads are crap so buy new wagners right off, the other ones make a dirty mess all the time. I also used ce rear suspension kit, ce used dodge dakota truck springs and my 48 rides like a truck even with the tuner spring removed. A friend used weedetr's kit and his car rides like a new car, I love it. I've got to get rid of my springs just because of the bumps in the road. Also remember this, even with the longer a arms, if you want to run narrow tires, say 5 or 6 inch tread width, your wheels will be inwards of a couple of inches from the fender edge. So I had to get rims with very little back spacing so the front wheels aligned up with the rear wheels to look good. If you want to know anything else, pm me. I ended up turning the a arm adjusting screw all the way down to get fender clearance on bumpy turns too.
     

    Attached Files:

  14. farmer12
    Joined: Aug 28, 2006
    Posts: 7,717

    farmer12
    Member

    I've used the m2 set up from Heidts using bags. The installation instructions were very clear, but take your time measuring and measuring.....they provided great tech support as well. They are probably not the cheapest around but I do like the peace of mind aspect. Let me know if I can help you any further. Eric/farmer12
     
  15. badlefihand
    Joined: Apr 20, 2007
    Posts: 318

    badlefihand
    Member

    What rotors do you guy's run. CE is a fine unit but they have problems with lower control arm scraping on rotor when using a stamped control arm. Their answer is to beat on the control arm to gain clearance. Guess the answer is Heigts tube arms that use the strut rod.Another $299.
     
  16. hinklejd
    Joined: Jan 20, 2010
    Posts: 146

    hinklejd
    Member
    from Fort Worth

    Thanks for the replys, fellas.

    I've been convinced to go away from the sotrut rods and go with the a-arms top and bottom. I'd rather spend a little more now and build it right once than spend more money later to build it the way it should have been done from the outset. It looks like JPL is also the way to go, based on prices and reputation. Thanks...and I'll have to take pics of the install.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.