Register now to get rid of these ads!

Gas mileage on a 235?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by haney, Oct 5, 2010.

  1. haney
    Joined: Jul 14, 2008
    Posts: 150

    haney
    Member
    from Knoxville

    I've currently got a 235 in my '51 chevy 2 door. I swapped the 4.11 rear for a 3.55 and I've still got the closed driveline with 3 speed on the column. I'm getting about 10 to the gallon, is that pretty typical? Have those of you who have switched to other setups seen better gas mileage?

    Thanks,

    Haney
     
  2. Road Runner
    Joined: Feb 7, 2007
    Posts: 1,256

    Road Runner
    Member

    Did you install a speedo adapter on the transmission/speedo cable and checked your odometer with mile markers, before calculating mileage ?

    I got the same setup on my truck and get 19-20 mpg on the freeways with 28+ diameter tires and Patrick's adapter.
     
  3. Unsafe6
    Joined: Dec 7, 2007
    Posts: 129

    Unsafe6
    Member

    Hi I have a stock 235in my 54 with split exhaust, 3spd, Nova rear with 2.73 gears. I drive it everywhere. and get 17MPG (US gal.) with 3.55 powerglide gears you should be getting at least 14 Id guess. Did you bump your timing till it pings on regular gas then back it up a couple deg.? Is your power valve closing? I use a GPS for distance calculation.
     
  4. Beebeebobby
    Joined: Sep 5, 2010
    Posts: 224

    Beebeebobby
    Member
    from Webb City

    Seems too low for what I know about them...The trannyswap should have made it better than what you were getting. But, that seems too low a gas mileage for that engine.
     

  5. Aman
    Joined: Dec 28, 2005
    Posts: 2,522

    Aman
    Member
    from Texas

    The guy I bought my 55 from said he got about 9 mpg coming from the valley to Corpus. I thought that was lousy so I rebuilt the carb only to find the floats way off. I haven't had a chance to check the mpg now but my bet is much better mpg with rebuild.
     
  6. haney
    Joined: Jul 14, 2008
    Posts: 150

    haney
    Member
    from Knoxville

    Did you install a speedo adapter on the transmission/speedo cable and checked your odometer with mile markers, before calculating mileage ?

    I just checked google maps for the length of my daily commute against how many days I can go on a fill up, it's just a rough estimate, but it still seemed low.

    Did you bump your timing till it pings on regular gas then back it up a couple deg.? Is your power valve closing?

    No, and I don't know, I will look into that.
     
  7. ragtop50
    Joined: Jun 12, 2010
    Posts: 104

    ragtop50
    Member
    from UK

    I get about 18 mpg from my 235 3 speed and that's with a 4.11 and the vert is heavier
     
  8. henry29
    Joined: Sep 5, 2007
    Posts: 2,879

    henry29
    Member

    I used to get about 16 mpg in my 46 chevy with a 54 235.
     
  9. dbradley
    Joined: Jan 6, 2007
    Posts: 1,036

    dbradley
    Member

    When I first got my '62 Belair it had a 235. Got about 17 or so with a 3.36 gear. But it ran pig rich when cold. I wish I could get that 17 now (496 installed):D
     
  10. gas pumper
    Joined: Aug 13, 2007
    Posts: 2,957

    gas pumper
    Member

    I have a 54 210. 235 with shaved head and decked block, Howard's cam, Hei with vac advance, 2 Model b's on an offy. Fenton headers and duals. four speed Saginaw. 2.93 Nova rear, Radial tires. Synthetic oil. Regular gas.

    70 mph highway trips at 2500 rpm get me 25 mpg. A little less on local driving but still not bad.
     
  11. rajcam79
    Joined: Nov 6, 2009
    Posts: 160

    rajcam79
    Member
    from S.E. MI

    I get roughly 17.5 mpg with my 261 3 speed and 3.90 gears in my truck. That is all city driving. I only have rebuilt my carb, everything else is un touched.
     
  12. wizzard23
    Joined: Dec 12, 2009
    Posts: 733

    wizzard23
    Member

    Our old Fleetline with a cam , 2 -1 bbls , split exhaust, 4 ;11's would always do at least 15.
     
  13. rajcam79
    Joined: Nov 6, 2009
    Posts: 160

    rajcam79
    Member
    from S.E. MI

    Dang 25 mpg !!! That would be awesome if I could get something like that in my truck.
     
  14. haney
    Joined: Jul 14, 2008
    Posts: 150

    haney
    Member
    from Knoxville

    It's very possible that that's my problem as well, I rebuilt the carb, and it was the first one I had ever rebuilt.

    What size tires are you guys who are getting >20mpg running? I've got 17" cragers with low profile tires and they measure about 24" tall, I'm beginning to wonder if that's part of my problem.
     
  15. R Pope
    Joined: Jan 23, 2006
    Posts: 3,309

    R Pope
    Member

    My '52 235 stick, bone stock, gets a tad over 20 on a Canadian gallon, that's about 16 on a US gallon.
     
  16. junkyardjeff
    Joined: Jul 23, 2005
    Posts: 8,596

    junkyardjeff
    Member

    I have a 37 p/u with a 57 235 and when I installed the T-5 and modern rear end the gas mileage got worse,those motors are designed to spin fast with the steep gears so some tinkering with the carb is needed. You first will need to put a lighter spring in the power valve since its not spinning as fast as it used to the vacumn is lower and the power valve is opening too soon,you might have to put a smaller jet in the carb. I am still trying to get the 37 figured out and cant do much untill I get rid of the too tall gears,I changed the jet and found a light power valve spring and it helped but the 2.79 gears are way too tall.
     
  17. wvenfield
    Joined: Nov 23, 2006
    Posts: 5,585

    wvenfield
    Member

    15-17 on the 54 Chevy I had with a PG.
     
  18. fat141
    Joined: Jul 30, 2006
    Posts: 1,575

    fat141
    Member

    What size tires are you guys who are getting >20mpg running? I've got 17" cragers with low profile tires and they measure about 24" tall, I'm beginning to wonder if that's part of my problem.[/QUOTE]

    There's a big part of your problem, get rid of that 17 in and 24" tyres. I run stock 15" wheels with 225/75/15" and they 29.5" tall.
    Also run 4speed and 3.08 rear, my 235 has mild cam, Fenton splits, cruises comfortably 75mph and gets about 25 mpg. (if I hold the speed back around 60mph)
    First step, TALLER tyres:D
    Rod
     
  19. zman
    Joined: Apr 2, 2001
    Posts: 16,730

    zman
    Member
    from Garner, NC

    Ya know the pinging starts before you can hear it. You can still do damage this way.

    Oh yeah it is, the mileage is scared of the ugly. :eek::D
     
  20. mastadon
    Joined: Mar 14, 2010
    Posts: 168

    mastadon
    Member

    This past weekend we drove 350 miles and got 18mpg in my 51 3100.I'm runnin a stock 54 235,T5 trans,3.90 gear and 28" tall tire.Make sure you have no fuel leks ,external or internal.
     
  21. zman
    Joined: Apr 2, 2001
    Posts: 16,730

    zman
    Member
    from Garner, NC

    and just to add, I got 16-18mpg in my '59 Fleetside with a 235, saginaw 4 speed, and a 3.08 geared rear end. That was highway or around town didn't matter.
     
  22. R Pope
    Joined: Jan 23, 2006
    Posts: 3,309

    R Pope
    Member

    Jeff makes a good point about Stovebolts liking a higher RPM. I put a '55 4.11 rear and OD in my '54 hardtop, it got better mileage in Direct than in OD. I liked it, though, I could cruise 15 MPH faster. In the '70's, nobody cared about MPG!
     
  23. Truckedup
    Joined: Jul 25, 2006
    Posts: 4,660

    Truckedup
    Member

    I think what Jeff is saying is the low rpm creates a lower intake vacuum and the power valve opens during part throttle reducing fuel mileage.
    If your cruising vacuum is above 10 inches you should see a mileage increase with lower rpm's,this is my experience on several 235-261's and a GMC 302.
    I take road trips along with a bunch of other guys with old GM trucks,the modified engines,more compression,carb and a 3/4 cam seem to get slightly better mileage than a stock engine.12-20 mpg being the most oftem reported MPG depending on engine , gearing and amount of bullshit slinging..
     
  24. Von Rigg Fink
    Joined: Jun 11, 2007
    Posts: 13,404

    Von Rigg Fink
    Member
    from Garage

    on a stock 53 chevy set up and 3 on the tree..i was getting around 18
     
  25. Jebo
    Joined: Apr 24, 2007
    Posts: 163

    Jebo
    Member

    My 41 chevy, 235 headers, strait duels, 4.11s, and 31 inch white walls I get 21-23 mpg! I miss that damn thing, Gota get back on it!
     
  26. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 56,093

    squirrel
    Member

    Get the odometer working, make sure it's accurate by driving it over several marked miles. Run several tanks of gas, noting the mileage at each fillup, fill it full every time, then calculate the average mileage over many hundreds of miles.

    Then you'll know what mileage you're getting.

    10 mpg in heavy traffic is plausible. 20 would be the upper limit, with highway gearing and moderate speeds on the open road. 13-17 is pretty typical.
     
  27. zman
    Joined: Apr 2, 2001
    Posts: 16,730

    zman
    Member
    from Garner, NC

    Highway gearing and ease of drivability was my whole reason to go with the 4 speed and rear gears. Made a huge difference even around town.
     
  28. junkyardjeff
    Joined: Jul 23, 2005
    Posts: 8,596

    junkyardjeff
    Member

    I am beginning to think a modern carb and a RV grind cam might be the solution to better gas mileage on those stovebolt sixes since they were designed around those steep gears back then compared to the more highway friendly gears of lately,if I ever take the front sheetmetal off or find a 261 I will check into another cam but now I am not going to mess with the internals. I am thinking on going back to 4.11 gears since the motor seems to like it better going at those RPMs instead of what its doing now and I have o/d for the highway.
     
  29. Road Runner
    Joined: Feb 7, 2007
    Posts: 1,256

    Road Runner
    Member

    A vacuum gauge on the dash is your friend in finding the right rpm, cam, gear and tire size combination.
     
  30. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 56,093

    squirrel
    Member

    from the little testing I've done, less vacuum equals more efficient operation....high vacuum means the engine is being throttled, so a larger percent of the fuel you give it is being used to overcome internal friction, instead of powering the car.

    but I could be wrong. Do you have more vacuum in overdrive or 1:1, at the same speed? which gives better mileage?
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.