Register now to get rid of these ads!

A tudor to pickup, does this look dumb?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by atotalnincompoop, Jan 13, 2010.

  1. I love how one guy will show up and say it's not "traditional" and then there's 5 people who have seen the same thing built 40 years ago. Turning old cars into trucks has been done since there were old cars around to do it to. Only thing that matters is if YOU like it. This place is full of guys who think everything that's not done exactly the way they would do it is crap. The first guy to put a straight axle in a 55 Chevy was probably called a hack too.. You're not building it for them you're building it for you. Keep us posted. It looks like a cool project.
     
  2. spooler41
    Joined: Feb 25, 2007
    Posts: 1,099

    spooler41
    Member

    If you are very tall, you'll love the extra leg room in this conversion. I'm about 6' and find my 31 P/U to be almost to small, it's going to take some creative seat building to be comfortable in a standard Mod. A cab. Go ahead with your cab build and you/ll thank your self later.

    ............ Jack
     
  3. screwball
    Joined: Mar 5, 2001
    Posts: 1,761

    screwball
    Member

    body styles like that arnt bobbers they are high boys and have been done that way from the factory. As for the cut up sedan to truck conversation thats been done since ww 2 looks good IVE been looking for a sedan body to cut up like that for years.
     
  4. bgbdlinc
    Joined: Jan 11, 2002
    Posts: 522

    bgbdlinc
    Member

    ...I'm doing something similar with a '30 Chrysler mordoor but I'm going to keep the quarter window and reduce it's width about 2-3". It also needs an additional 1" chop to cleanup the mess that the previous owner did when it was a mordoor......

    [​IMG]

    Member 'Scootermcrad' did a wonderful series of posts on this type of build along the lines of a lakester coupe rather than a pickup. He went through alot of eyeballing and study of agreeable proportions to end up with a really nice piece.....
    Good luck with it...you're on the right track....
     
  5. It's gonna look a bit like an extended cab....
    I wouldn't knock it, It looks like it'll be cool to strech back in...
     
  6. strombergs97
    Joined: May 22, 2006
    Posts: 1,888

    strombergs97
    Member
    from California

    What I like best is the creativity, it's yours, follow through..
    Duane.
     
  7. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 23,333

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I think that an extended cab is a good idea. The factory closed-cab pickups are TINY.
     
  8. If it were mine i would add some small windows behind the front door. idunno how it would look but what about a big wrap arround back window? and maybe chopping it a bit but have some good rake to the roof idunno.. i could think of a thousand things to do or not do to it. save all the pieces you remove, if ya dont like how it turned out weld it back in.
     
  9. No Cents
    Joined: Feb 28, 2009
    Posts: 335

    No Cents
    Member



    What he said.:D
     
  10. that might look pretty cool!
    but what are the chances of finding one the right dimensions?:eek:
     
  11. idunno.. i think some pickups had wrap arround back windows.. but don't quote me on that though. what about from like a van or somthing did the early econolines or sportsmans have a back window like that?
     
  12. and i think depending on how it was done it could look hideous... i think i would sit in the garage drinking beer looking at the car for at least a week before ya did something like that..
     
  13. MedicCustoms
    Joined: Nov 24, 2008
    Posts: 1,094

    MedicCustoms
    Member

    Heres one that I had.:cool: I like them. This went to a guy in Fl. I got It from a guy here on the HAMB
     

    Attached Files:

  14. I'm on it!!:D
     
  15. looks good, i had thought about putting a really thin side window like this made out of my tudors side window, but couldn't get it to work easy enough, so i said fuck it, no side window!:D
     
  16. It will look as good as you want it. Iam using a werecked coupe to make my truck.Its nothing to brag about .Got a diesel and my grand kids setting on the running board are having fun being part of the build.
     
  17. billyt
    Joined: May 14, 2008
    Posts: 42

    billyt
    Member

    A friend bought an original A that had been converted to a pickup by a couple of old mechanics probably in the 40s or 50s. I liked it. Go for it.
     
  18. just remember you must have enough beer to be locked in the garage for a week
     
  19. I think it's a great idea. People in the 20's & 30's musta been midgets to fit comfortably in a stock T or A pickup. The only thing I'd do is like the others said, bring the back panel of the cab straight down below the belt line. It still won't look like a factory original but it also wouldn't scream cutup tudor either. It will just look more like a truck cab should. What I think you'll end up with is a truck you can enjoy and drive a lot more as you won't feel like you're folded in half when you're sitting in it.
     
  20. landseaandair
    Joined: Feb 23, 2009
    Posts: 4,485

    landseaandair
    Member
    from phoenix

    Forgive me, I know the damage is done, but why are people still cutting up perfectly good tudors? (that's what fordors are for) I really dig 'em and sure hope this trend doesn't continue.
     
  21. a.y1320
    Joined: Feb 3, 2008
    Posts: 117

    a.y1320
    Member

    I thought about putting a bed on my sedan, nah
     

    Attached Files:

  22. need louvers ?
    Joined: Nov 20, 2008
    Posts: 12,903

    need louvers ?
    Member

    Not my cup of tea, but it's not my car either. If you continue on I would take the advise of a few earlier posts and straighten out the lower quarters to look more truckish. If it were mine I would find the back panels from a pickup and call it a deal. Tudors and pick ups shared doors and most of the sub frame so it would look pretty accurate. Just my .02
     
  23. ruquik
    Joined: Jul 19, 2006
    Posts: 88

    ruquik
    Member

    I'll quote you on it...LOL

    Chevy/GMC
    [​IMG]
    or
    [​IMG]
     
  24. i meant a one piece wrap arround lol and looking again that econoline i put up there has a 3 piece window too der...
     
  25. redsteely
    Joined: Nov 4, 2008
    Posts: 183

    redsteely
    Member
    from Phoenix az

    I like it. Maybe a little less behind the door?
     
  26. TSEDAN
    Joined: Jan 22, 2008
    Posts: 54

    TSEDAN
    Member
    from Fresno,Ca

    I'm doing one right now, got it with 28 pick-up flat sides behind the doors and a wooden back. Took off the wood in the back an replaced it with metal with a 30 window and used a 89 Lincon Mark 7 roof. Doing it full fendered, no splash apron with 12" stepup in the rear of the frame and 8' in the front. Custom running boards. Will try to get some pics real soon.
     
  27. nji
    Joined: Nov 29, 2009
    Posts: 3

    nji
    Member

    I used to see a lot of these in abandoned mining towns. Folks would get work hauling for the mine and had to provide their own vehicle. If they already had a sedan it got cut and anything that would serve as a bed was thrown on.

    A lot of people are saying to straighten then lower quarters, but maybe the look you want is one of the old workhorse sedan to truck conversions?

    I wish I had pictures.
     
  28. kami-cozzi
    Joined: Jan 22, 2009
    Posts: 83

    kami-cozzi
    Member




    [​IMG] i like this mans style. its only steel thats what i say. thats why they make welders. so try whatever, if it sucks A$$, hit the undo button
     
  29. Doug B
    Joined: Feb 2, 2008
    Posts: 478

    Doug B
    Member

    I say do it. And do the bed like Corn Fed did. This thing looks cool!
     

    Attached Files:

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.