Register now to get rid of these ads!

1949 ford rear end

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by brekteffect, Jun 11, 2009.

  1. brekteffect
    Joined: Sep 24, 2007
    Posts: 51

    brekteffect
    Member

    Can anyone tell me what kind/model rear end was used in the 49 to 54 ford cars? Ive got one that is going under my 27 roadster and it would be nice to what to call it besides a dwarf 9 inch.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. TexasHardcore
    Joined: May 30, 2003
    Posts: 5,042

    TexasHardcore
    Member
    from Austin-ish

    Hotchkiss Drive.

    I call it a 'shoebox rear'... I don't know what else to call it.
     
  3. keeffer
    Joined: Jan 25, 2008
    Posts: 111

    keeffer
    Member

    pain in the ass
     

  4. 50shoe
    Joined: Sep 14, 2005
    Posts: 640

    50shoe
    Member

  5. Might work ok in a light car, but I wouldn't use it.

    The later Ford 8" is a much better choice.
    It uses the same size axles as the 28 spline Ford 9".


    Replaced several axles in stock motored Shoeboxes and one of them broke while backing out of a parking spot.

    To be fair, it had been abused, but not that bad.
    The engines we ran weren't all that strong and we'd given up on burning rubber in low and chirping 2nd long ago....
     
  6. flathead4d
    Joined: Oct 24, 2005
    Posts: 898

    flathead4d
    Member

    Put a 8 inch Maverick five lug in it. Almost a direct bolt in. spring perches are a half inch off.
     
  7. its a dana but i forget the number. i wouldnt use it hell i have a s10 one under my shoe box in the garage
     
  8. In a T roadster? Awesome!
     
  9. JohnEvans
    Joined: Apr 13, 2008
    Posts: 4,883

    JohnEvans
    Member
    from Phoenix AZ

    Frail POS Ford design.
     

  10. It was sufficient for the time and worked ok in reasonably driven cars.:)


    Ford axles are doing ok nowadays.:cool:
     
  11. rodknocker
    Joined: Jan 31, 2006
    Posts: 2,265

    rodknocker

    This same question was asked on the Shoebox website, the results were quite different then being said on here. I'm not saying they're good or bad, just that there's more opinions out there.
     
  12. brekteffect
    Joined: Sep 24, 2007
    Posts: 51

    brekteffect
    Member

    I figured theyre not too strong but I wanted something a little different. Id think it would have a fair chance under a 1700 or so pound car with a stock 292y and if not spare parts are not too hard to get around here. Is it mostly just axles they break? if so id better stock up. how do they compare to a banjo? thanks for the input.
     
  13. The 8" Maverick/Granada/Comet/Mustang is probably easier to get parts for if you do break something. The original rear in my '55 Ford has well over 200,000 on it and has never given a minute's trouble in 54 years, so the '49-'56 rears will hold up fine in normal driving with a reasonably stock engine. As others have noted, they won't take a lot of abuse. Comparing to the banjo rears, I guess it comes down to whether you prefer changing axles ('49-'56) or sheared off axle keys (banjo). Carrying spare axles takes up space, you can keep spare axle keys in the glove box or ash tray.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.