Register now to get rid of these ads!

Why I like traditional.......

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Chaz, Jul 20, 2008.

  1. Chaz
    Joined: Feb 24, 2004
    Posts: 5,016

    Chaz
    Member Emeritus

    We have a project in the shop now that's too new to be here, a 2003 mustang. We were taking apart the front spindle to look at the wheel bearings. Sounds simple enough eh?
    Well theres this goddamed nut with another sheetmetal nut formed over the top of it to hold on the front hub. I mean WTF is that? We have no Idea how to remove that sucker.
    What was wrong with the castle nut and cotter key that worked successfully for fity plus years? Sometimes I just dont get this "change for change sake" shit. Can ya tell I'm frustrated?
    I pity the next poor bastard that asks me why I dont want a new car.
    Oh yeah, if anyone can tell me how to get that nut off it'd be appreciated.
     
  2. gallagher
    Joined: Jun 25, 2006
    Posts: 190

    gallagher
    Member
    from califorina

    you replace the hole hub if its bad :(
     
  3. lostn51
    Joined: Jan 24, 2008
    Posts: 2,206

    lostn51
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Tennessee

    call ford tomorrow and ask them, or go to O' Reilly's auto parts they have the info in their computer from their website.
     
  4. 296 V8
    Joined: Sep 17, 2003
    Posts: 4,666

    296 V8
    BANNED
    from Nor~Cal

    Your not alone brother. I had to deal with the same thing a week or two ago at work.
    Yes it seems the nut and cotter pin stopped working :rolleyes:

    My theory?
    Engineers have figured out that they need to reinvent stuff so they can keep there jobs.
    Iv always said they invented the engineer so retards could have a job. Now im not so sure. :confused: I think im the.......
     

  5. gallagher
    Joined: Jun 25, 2006
    Posts: 190

    gallagher
    Member
    from califorina

    as per motor on line

    Raise the vehicle until the tire is off the floor.
    NOTE: Make sure the wheel rotates freely and the brake pads are retracted sufficiently to allow movement of the tire and wheel assembly. Grasp each tire at the top and bottom and move the wheel inward and outward while lifting the weight of the tire off the wheel If the tire and wheel hub is loose on the wheel spindle or does not rotate freely, install a new front wheel hub
     
    Last edited: Jul 20, 2008
  6. Chaz
    Joined: Feb 24, 2004
    Posts: 5,016

    Chaz
    Member Emeritus


    Yeah, but to change that hub assembly you still have to get the nut off the spindle.
     
  7. GTS225
    Joined: Jul 2, 2006
    Posts: 1,244

    GTS225
    Member

    Yeah......don'tcha just love sealed unit bearing hubs, and the price of them?

    Roger
     
  8. Frank
    Joined: Jul 30, 2004
    Posts: 2,325

    Frank
    Member


    AMEN brother! Engineers delibrately making things more complicated and expensive. Take drive-by-wire for instance. All your new cars no longer use throttle cables. Instead they have an electronic servo to move the throttle. I just don't trust those things.

    Chaz, as for the sheet metal cover, its nothing to worry about. As soon as you pull the cotter pin it just falls off and you unscrew the nut underneath. Its really a non issue, but I hear where you are coming from.
     
  9. Bodacious
    Joined: Apr 4, 2008
    Posts: 286

    Bodacious
    Member

    Automotive History Part I:
    We spend the first half century getting cars right.
    Automotive History Part II:
    We spend the next half century fucking them up.
     
  10. Chaz
    Joined: Feb 24, 2004
    Posts: 5,016

    Chaz
    Member Emeritus


    No dude, This aint like the old nut cover with the cotter pin. There's no cotterpin at all!
    The sheetmetal cover wraps completely around the nut- a six sided fold over the sides AND top.
    If I could find that particular engineer I'd punch hin in the neck.
     
  11. fatcaddi
    Joined: May 3, 2004
    Posts: 369

    fatcaddi
    Member

    if its what im thinking then there is a sheet metal peice that is behind the nut with pieces folded over the nut. just bend them back, but im probably wrong, if i saw a picture i could probably tell ya
     
  12. ttop88
    Joined: Jun 27, 2007
    Posts: 40

    ttop88
    Member
    from indiana

    I have replaced just the bearing on a 99 mustang before. Got the new Timkin bearing at advance auto for 60-70 bucks I think. As for the nut IIRC I just put a 21mm socket on the impact and took it off in one shot. I think it is torqued to 140 ft lb's
     
  13. SaltCityCustoms
    Joined: Jun 27, 2007
    Posts: 1,212

    SaltCityCustoms
    Member

    They are trying to make it so that you can only have repairs done at the dealerships now, they don't want even the independent shops to be able to work on new cars so they make everything with a required tool to do the repair and a special method of how to do it.
     
  14. Any pics? Just a thought- can you knock/drive the sheetmetal nut off?
     
  15. Hackerbilt
    Joined: Aug 13, 2001
    Posts: 6,254

    Hackerbilt
    Member

    I think whats happening is that most parts arrive at the plant as sub-assemblies, supplied by independant suppliers.
    Cuts down on the assembly time, the number of inplant subassembly lines...and more importantly...gives the car companies someone to blame if a part goes bad.

    "WHAT? Mustang door panels are peeling?
    Call the subcontractor that supplied them and tell THEM to redesign and resupply for a Mustang recall or we'll SUE. It's in their contract!!!"
     
  16. greenmachine53
    Joined: May 10, 2008
    Posts: 22

    greenmachine53
    BANNED

    As a tech at the local Ford dealer, Just thought I would ad to this. The sheetmetal part is actually a piece of the nut. If you take the sheetmetal off of the nut you might as well throw it away and buy a new nut(which will come wrapped in sheetmetal). Just my 2cents.....
     
  17. Royalshifter
    Joined: May 29, 2005
    Posts: 15,583

    Royalshifter
    Moderator
    from California

    1972 is where the fun ended.
     
  18. Sounds like they are trying to save a couple pennies on assembly time.
    Obviously,maintenance is not a design priority.
     
  19. 49ratfink
    Joined: Feb 8, 2004
    Posts: 18,852

    49ratfink
    Member
    from California

    cars these days are not built with repairs down the road in mind. if ford or anyone else can do something to save 2 bucks on every car that will cost the owner 500 bucks 5 years from now if something wears out they will do it
     
  20. Royalshifter- take that back to early 1970... just before smog equipment entered the scene.
     
  21. Chaz
    Joined: Feb 24, 2004
    Posts: 5,016

    Chaz
    Member Emeritus

    This turned out to be kind of an interesting post. As it shook out the part is a single piece. A nut wrapped in sheetmetal. There is no cotterpin. The sucker is just torqued to 250 foot pounds. No adjustment capabilities.
    So I'll just put a big airwrench on it and spin it off. No adjustment, no finesse , no capability to get any extra life out of it.

    Sorry, but the castlenut and cotterpin made me involved with the car. I can adjust, I can fine tune.. That capability is gone with remove and replace mechanics. This is just one reason I love old cars. I can actually interact with them.
    I know this is a little thing, but its really just an example of where we lost it.
     
    Last edited: Jul 20, 2008
  22. Ruben Duran
    Joined: Aug 18, 2007
    Posts: 604

    Ruben Duran
    Member

    Hey Chaz....not sure if you found the answer yet, but I removed a wheel bearing off an '01 GT. It should be the same as a 2003. Here's what I did: I used a 36mm socket, breaker bar and a sh*t load of muscle. It's actually a multiple nut configuration with what appears to be a C channel wrapped around the outage edge of the Nut(s). The channel actual holds the nuts together as one unit. Once you pull the nut, the whole bearing/hub assembles pulls off...it is one non serviceable unit. Cost about $55-$80 (maybe more) depending on the brand. When you put the unit back on, Ford says to torque it to 258 ft-lbs. Hope this helps. Cheers. :cool:
     
  23. New cars suck. But then everyone here probably already knows that.
     
  24. Jalopy Jim
    Joined: Aug 3, 2005
    Posts: 1,867

    Jalopy Jim
    Member

    Even simple things they have messed up.
    Yesterday I went to check the oil in the T-5 transmission of my 99 Sonoma and it required an 5/8" hex internial drive socket. I tried a bolt that fit with two nuts jamed together and that did not work, three stores later on Sunday no luck until Tractor supply and a 1/2 inch connectoer nut used with my socket. So latter I looked at the T-5 in my Falcon ( 86Mustang GT ) and that has a 3/4" square drive like every other transmission/ rear end I have ever seen.
     
  25. belair
    Joined: Jul 10, 2006
    Posts: 9,015

    belair
    Member

    It's ALL been goin' downhill since Buddy Holley died. Or at least when cables got replaced with vacuum hoses.
     
  26. mustangsix
    Joined: Mar 7, 2005
    Posts: 1,409

    mustangsix
    Member

    That's another one of those things done to make manufacturing easier. Sealed bearings can be set in place by a robot easier than something that has to be greased. Then assembly and the nut can be installed and tightened by a robot. Very precise, very measurable, very repeatable, and very fast.

    Good for the robot, good for the manufacturer, bad for human assembly line workers and maintainers later. :mad:
     
  27. Frank
    Joined: Jul 30, 2004
    Posts: 2,325

    Frank
    Member

    Think that's bad, a lot of transmissions now do not have fill plugs because they are not designed to be serviced.

    You never can convince the sheep though why we prefer our old cars that require maintenance are better than the new junk out there.
     
  28. rockabillybus
    Joined: Jan 9, 2008
    Posts: 227

    rockabillybus
    Member

    Yea, Chevy is the same way. Had a front bearing going out in my 2002 pick-up. I thought it was still the spindle,castle nut and cotter pin deal. I figured $40.00 in new bearings and seals and I would be back in business. Jacked up the front and pulled the tire only to find out it was a hub assembly. Easy to change, but I didn't think I would need a home equity loan to buy the new parts.:mad: Dealer price..$300.00... Bennet Auto...&160.00. So much for doing both fronts. I'll wait for the other one to go out.
     
  29. 1950ChevySuburban
    Joined: Dec 20, 2006
    Posts: 6,187

    1950ChevySuburban
    Member Emeritus
    from Tucson AZ

    How many miles are on that Mustang? I've got similar setup on my '97 Saturn, 163000 miles on the original bearings. Sometimes things do improve with age, even if they change some.
     
  30. novadude
    Joined: Dec 15, 2005
    Posts: 531

    novadude
    Member

    I disagree. I'd say it's GREAT for people that need to service later. In my opinion, the days of the skilled technician are GONE!

    With the majority of people taking their cars to Pep Boys and the like for service, this type of sealed assembly is idiot proof - Crank it down and go. Do you really want to rely on some low-paid hack mechanic to set your bearings the correct way?

    Think about it:

    Old way: remove hub, clean all old grease from hub, press out old bearing races, install new races, pack bearings, set preload, install cotter key.

    New way: Remove big-ass nut and pull hub assembly. Remove new part from box, slide on spindle, torque big-ass nut.

    A lot more opportunity for "user error" (dirt, improper assembly, etc) in the "old way".

    No offense to anyone that may work at one of these "chain" stores, but I barely trust those folks to install tires, let alone pack bearings, keep them clean, and set them properly. You see the same lack of knowledge at the parts counter.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.