Register now to get rid of these ads!

TECH: Z-ing wishbones, my way

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Chris Casny, Mar 5, 2008.

  1. ray
    Joined: Jun 25, 2001
    Posts: 3,791

    ray
    Member
    from colorado

     
  2. rab71
    Joined: Jan 1, 2007
    Posts: 571

    rab71
    Member

    Sinister you are correct, we build large commercial buildings and I see guys welling all the time with Mig welders, adn you kno wthat stuff has to be srong. Zach made a VERY good point. Not a lot of stress with torque tube.
     
  3. nexxussian
    Joined: Mar 14, 2007
    Posts: 3,240

    nexxussian
    Member


    I think that's the biggest concern with MIG. It is (in my limited experience) the easiest to get a good looking weld. It is also the easiest to get a good looking weld that won't hold worth a damn, so for me I would have to say X2 on the operator being the more important part of the equasion (as they are likely to do the fitup/prep as well).

    It's why we paid a liscenced and bonded professional to weld in the new front X member in our Anglia (that and concern over ending up with a pretzel).
     
  4. i'm toss in with operator error on most failures and well as some one useing the wrong (underpowered) welder as aposed to the type of welder used. that beeing said we did 440 stick weld the kicks in the frame of my mod but the crossmembers were 220 mig
     
  5. NealinCA
    Joined: Dec 12, 2001
    Posts: 3,155

    NealinCA
    Member

    Everything on my chassis is stick welded with 7014. And I agree...it's the operator using the correct amperage, etc. that matters...MIG, TIG, or stick. Penetration matters.

    Neal
     
  6. NealinCA hit the nail on the head. What do you think they used before mig and tig, it was gas or stick. nice job the wishbones. NealinCa that chassis is a work of art can't wait to see the rest of the truck.
     
  7. ALindustrial
    Joined: Aug 7, 2007
    Posts: 852

    ALindustrial
    Member

    looks great! you have one hell of a skill!
     
  8. munster
    Joined: Apr 4, 2005
    Posts: 235

    munster
    Member
    from burbank

    looks great chris!
     
  9. scottybaccus
    Joined: Mar 13, 2006
    Posts: 4,109

    scottybaccus
    Member

    Nice work Chris.

    DeSoto,
    I can certainly appreciate a tig welder, but I am pretty sure everyone in the US has staked their lives on MIG welded cars every day for the last 50 years. Last I checked, every mass produced car and truck chassis or sub-frame in use was MIG welded.
     
  10. dodgerodder
    Joined: Feb 15, 2005
    Posts: 1,943

    dodgerodder
    Member

    Wow, very nice thread, great end result! I want your press by the way. The whole chassis really looks great. The tough things about projects like that is making a second one exactly the same as the first.

    Nice job
     
  11. j ripper
    Joined: Aug 2, 2006
    Posts: 830

    j ripper
    Member
    from napa ca.

    what he said...
     
  12. DE SOTO
    Joined: Jan 20, 2006
    Posts: 3,857

    DE SOTO
    Member


    This is true, And maybe i opened my mouth before i saw that He was still using a Torque Tube.

    So my next Dumb ass Question ... And im not talkin shit to 'Ol Dreadman........

    But if you are still useing a Torque Tube..... What is the reason of a "Zed" Bone ??

    I cant see an advantage so School me on what this Mod is for ...
     
  13. slddnmatt
    Joined: Mar 30, 2006
    Posts: 3,685

    slddnmatt
    Member

    to clear the frame rails i believe.
     
  14. NealinCA
    Joined: Dec 12, 2001
    Posts: 3,155

    NealinCA
    Member

    ...because he c-notched the frame. When you go that low, 36 bones will hit the frame before the rear axle bottoms out...whether its got a torque tube or not.

    Neal
     
  15. mcbay
    Joined: Aug 20, 2007
    Posts: 513

    mcbay
    Member

    Nice post Dreadman. Dito Neal. Here is another solution to the problem using Ford parts. 48 Mercury front bones. They had to be extended to reach the t-tube and whittled where they mate up to the forging as the tube was wider. These are heavy wall tubes, almost twice as thick as the 36 tubes. Not good pictures.
     

    Attached Files:

  16. DE SOTO
    Joined: Jan 20, 2006
    Posts: 3,857

    DE SOTO
    Member

    I see ... Wasent for sure but its the same thing i ran into with the '40 Rear axle in my daughters "T" Roadster.

    I used '39 Lincoln rods, They are shorter & shoot in a sharper angle & clear the Kicked up rails Perfectally.

    Same thing only Different :D .... And alot less cutting, welding, and major fab work.
     
  17. NealinCA
    Joined: Dec 12, 2001
    Posts: 3,155

    NealinCA
    Member

    I looked at using the 42-48 front wishbones. They didn't have enough drop for what I needed, so I fabricated the "dropped" I beam section. I did like the heavy wall tube Ford used on the front bones, so I used 40 front tubes to make up my rear bones...they are 3/16" wall. Plus I ran the web of the I beam about 6 inches into the tube, so the joint is very strong...stronger than stock Ford bones. This was an issue since I am running open drive.

    My brother found a pair of 36 Lincoln Zephyr rear bones, they mount like 36 Ford, but are way shorter like Desoto's 39's...so he didn't have the clearance issue either. I didn't know about them when I modified mine. Now they are something I keep an eye out for.

    These are all neat solutions to the same problem....that's what's cool about hot rodding.

    Neal
     
  18. Chris Casny
    Joined: Mar 13, 2006
    Posts: 4,874

    Chris Casny
    Member

    There is always an easier way out, I could have just called Speedway and ordered ladderbars, but where is the fun in that.:D
     
  19. DE SOTO
    Joined: Jan 20, 2006
    Posts: 3,857

    DE SOTO
    Member

    Yeah, But then you would just have ladder bars :eek:

    Not knockin yer idea, I would rather see people do innovative stuff to old Ford parts like you did.

    I was just offering up another Stock Ford part to do the same thing while staying true to form.

    There are way to many people who do the 1-800-SEND-PARTS.
     
  20. InDaShop
    Joined: Aug 15, 2004
    Posts: 2,796

    InDaShop
    Member
    from Houston

    Desoto can you go back and delete or edit out your diatribe on mig welding, it takes away from the tech.

    I've butted heads with you way to much in the past to even for a minute believe you have any idea what is required and acceptable for laying a bead.
    Take it as a knock thats how it was intended.

    Dreadman, good work. I've had to do the port-a-band cutting to bend and get a radius before, then the grinding. I hate it, but the end results always look good. What do you think about the overall weakening of the area due the way you cut and bent the piece, i.e spread the cuts to be wider as you bent? Vs. flipping the piece and crushing the cuts together to make the bend?

    I just always feel better with more basemetal vs. gapped weld.

    Or maybe thats how you did it. I can't tell from the pic. Damned shadow.
    [​IMG]
     
  21. Kevin Lee
    Joined: Nov 12, 2001
    Posts: 7,584

    Kevin Lee
    Super Moderator
    Staff Member

    1) I think going back to edit posts after the fact kind of sucks. Makes threads hard to follow, can be a real hassle to moderate, etc. Please do not do this.

    Look: We should all be big kids here. If you act like an ass, say something that was found out to be wrong, etc. just man up and deal with it. I know I have ad to and I'm a moderator - I could erase it all if I wanted to but I think that's weak. Now if it gets totally out of hand we can moderate - that's what we're here for. But again, please don't monkey with history on a whim.

    2) Looks like Dreadman is making cuts on the inside of the bend to me.
     
  22. Gambino_Kustoms
    Joined: Oct 14, 2005
    Posts: 6,561

    Gambino_Kustoms
    Alliance Vendor

    Kool Homie I Like
     
  23. Gambino_Kustoms
    Joined: Oct 14, 2005
    Posts: 6,561

    Gambino_Kustoms
    Alliance Vendor

    real men NEVER taked the easy road
    thats what define us
     
  24. Kevin Lee
    Joined: Nov 12, 2001
    Posts: 7,584

    Kevin Lee
    Super Moderator
    Staff Member

    And to bring this back around I think every example posted here is pretty damn smart - wouldn't be afraid of any of them.
     
  25. InDaShop
    Joined: Aug 15, 2004
    Posts: 2,796

    InDaShop
    Member
    from Houston

    I think I need a better/newer monitor, my vintage one doesnt show the bend well at all.
    If the cuts are to the inside then forget my question, thats how I would have preferred doing it, if I haddone it myself. I know you cant always get away with what you want when working with this stuff. Then end product is beautiful, and curvacious.
     
  26. DE SOTO
    Joined: Jan 20, 2006
    Posts: 3,857

    DE SOTO
    Member

     
  27. Chris Casny
    Joined: Mar 13, 2006
    Posts: 4,874

    Chris Casny
    Member

    Indashop, I just relief cut all the pieces on the inside, like Kevin Lee said. I did it on the cut-off saw not the bandsaw. The trick is, the closer together the cuts, the tighter the radius is going to be. Ideally, you would cut out wedge shapes so there is no gap. I have done this on frame rails and other structural parts, and as long your doing a good job with the welding, tig, mig or stick, it will hold.
    Your most important weld is the bead you lay on the inside of the radius, the rest is just filler (not really) but you hear what I'm saying.

    Wow, it's exhausting just reading about the tig/mig/stick contoversy.
     
  28. Lil' Lance
    Joined: Nov 3, 2006
    Posts: 99

    Lil' Lance
    Member

    wow! this is very neato! great job! im going to have to keep this one in mind if/when i run into this problem. keep it up!
     
  29. Rusty
    Joined: Mar 4, 2004
    Posts: 9,474

    Rusty
    Member

  30. coopsdaddy
    Joined: Mar 7, 2007
    Posts: 883

    coopsdaddy
    Member
    from oklahoma

    what about using 40 rear wishbones,would that make any diff? i would use JB WELD
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.