Register now to get rid of these ads!

Oldsmobile / Buick aluminum 215 V-8

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by john56h, Mar 2, 2007.

  1. john56h
    Joined: Jan 28, 2007
    Posts: 1,760

    john56h
    Member

    Anybody running the Oldsmobile or Buick 215 cubic inch aluminum V-8 engines from the early 1960's ???

    How about the Land Rover version?


    "From 1961 to 1963 Oldsmobile manufactured its own version of the Buick-designed, all-aluminum 215 engine for the F-85 compact, known as the Rockette. This was a compact, lightweight engine with a dry weight of only 350 lb (159 kg). The Oldsmobile engine was very similar to the Buick engine, but not identical: it had larger combustion chambers with flat-topped (rather than domed) pistons, six bolts rather than five per cylinder head, and slighly larger intake valves. With an 8.75:1 compression ratio and a two-barrel carburetor, the Olds 215 had the same rated hp, 155 hp @ 4800 rpm, as the Buick 215, with 220 ft·lbf of torque at 2400 rpm. With a four-barrel carburetor and 10.25:1 compression, the Olds 215 made 185 hp (138 kW) @ 4800 rpm and 230 ft·lbf (312 N·m) (@ 3200 rpm.

    The basic Buick/Olds 215 V8 went onto become the well known Rover V8, remaining in production until the 1990s"
     
  2. Many years ago I drove a stock car '61 Buick Special that had the stock 215 V8. I kicked ass on cars running engines twice that size....not because of power as much as excellent handling. I like that motor a lot (in a light car) and highly recommend it.
     

    Attached Files:

  3. john56h
    Joined: Jan 28, 2007
    Posts: 1,760

    john56h
    Member

    It was quite a remarkable engine. Short lived in the GM lineup due to the cubic-inch and horsepower wars of the 60's....but it lived on for many years as a Rover powerplant.

    In the early 80's it made a brief ressurgence as a racing engine when Indianapolis rules mandated a "stock block" with a fairly small cubic inch limit. Sudenly, the 215 was the engine of choice for teams racing at Indy. Of course it only lasted a year or too.

    I've seen a few Midget race cars with 215 power too. Other than the flathead 60hp V-8, no other V-8 could compare in weight.
     
  4. Rootie Kazoootie
    Joined: Nov 27, 2006
    Posts: 8,134

    Rootie Kazoootie
    Member
    from Colorado

    The Buick 215 was the engine of choice for ol' M/Ts early Indy attempts.
     

    Attached Files:


  5. John Denich
    Joined: Nov 20, 2005
    Posts: 2,718

    John Denich

    They also made a Turbo Charged one for the Oldsmobile Jetfire, Mothers Polish is building a Custom one should be done this year, it will be bad ass.......
     
  6. tattooedup37
    Joined: Nov 17, 2006
    Posts: 555

    tattooedup37
    Member

    Yah the turbo had timing issues and had a early methanol injection system to help alleviate detonation. It only made like 5 more HP than the F85 or something like that. I got my hands on a Rover V8 not to long ago. Haven't decided whether or not to run it.
     
  7. 1SWANK1
    Joined: May 7, 2006
    Posts: 56

    1SWANK1
    Member

    I got a 63 Skylark with 215 4 barrel.Love to build a T roadster around it!Neat little motor.
     
  8. fraktv
    Joined: Sep 3, 2006
    Posts: 69

    fraktv
    Member

    The british Triumph TR8 1980-1981 use that same engine with fuel injection.
     
  9. 2manybillz
    Joined: May 30, 2005
    Posts: 835

    2manybillz
    Member

    I put one in a late '60s Cortina backed with a Muncie 4 speed and a posi unit in the stock rear - I think it was a 4.10 gear. Ran like stink and handled amazingly well - real neutral. I don't think the 215 was any heavier than the stock 4 and way more power. Quite the sleeper.
    Would really work great in a light roadster.
     
  10. mtkawboy
    Joined: Feb 12, 2007
    Posts: 1,213

    mtkawboy
    Member

    Got my butt kicked in my 427 57 Ford in the old days by one in a Austin Healy Sprite, not huge power but very light weight. Looked like it was made for it.
     
  11. Håkan
    Joined: Jan 15, 2007
    Posts: 24

    Håkan
    Member

    Had a 215 Olds in this T Roadster, the first one I built in the early eighties:

    [​IMG]

    Very light weight and ran pretty good from what I remember. Didn't like the auto trans though.

    Håkan
    Enköping, Sweden
     
  12. Thad
    Joined: Feb 21, 2006
    Posts: 4

    Thad
    Member

    Anybody everhear of McLaren? Started in Can Am with the BOP alum V-8. From there they went--------------
     
  13. My first ride ever in a hot rod was in a 215 powered T-bucket in 1975. :) I was eleven years old and the memory of that ride is as fresh as if it just happened.
     
  14. OFT
    Joined: Jun 1, 2005
    Posts: 574

    OFT
    Member

    You guy's all sound like it is a has been motor. They are still great. Friend of mine has one in his long travel sand rail. He is also building a traditional A highboy roadster with one (it has a 4:71 blower). He makes his own adaptors ect. The sandrail runs a subru all wheel drive trans set up. It is neat in how he did it all.
     
  15. john56h
    Joined: Jan 28, 2007
    Posts: 1,760

    john56h
    Member

    I know the horsepower ratings wern't very high, something like 155 with 2 bbl and 185 with 4 bbl and high compression, but how about "driveability"?

    I've had a few 330 Olds powered cars, and after driving some with 350's and 400's it seems to me that the 330 was a nice combination for driveability. Good blend of torque, acceleration and economy. But then again, the 327 Chevy is like that compared to 350.

    The 64 Olds I have now has a 225 C.I. V-6 engine. It's not much on power even though it is bigger than the V-8 that the F-85 had a year earlier. I'm guessing that even though the 215 was small, it was a bit more performance oriented than the V-6.
     
  16. kustombuilder
    Joined: Sep 18, 2002
    Posts: 7,750

    kustombuilder
    Member
    from Novi, MI

  17. Tore
    Joined: Mar 10, 2001
    Posts: 307

    Tore
    Member

    I`v got one to replace the Volga 4 banger in my 61 Buick !!!!
     
  18. DeucePhaeton
    Joined: Sep 10, 2003
    Posts: 1,013

    DeucePhaeton
    Member

    Rob has two. Not yet avalible.

    Olds with 2 x 2bbls for the bagged 62 Jetfire.
    Olds with 63-turbo for a back up plan.
     
  19. J Man
    Joined: Dec 11, 2003
    Posts: 4,131

    J Man
    Member
    from Angola, IN

    I have one for my T truck and am trying to locate some spares.
     
  20. gearhead 69
    Joined: Jun 26, 2006
    Posts: 6

    gearhead 69
    Member
    from uk

    theres loads of em in england ,early ones wernt much good the later ones produce more power ,the blocks can be taken out to around 6ltr, if you can afford it.[​IMG]
     
  21. tommy
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 14,757

    tommy
    Member Emeritus

    We had one around here that was transplanted into a 65 Corvair. The owner claimed it weighed 50# less than the Corviar 6 cyl. He claimed it ran like stink and still handled like a sports car.

    A customer brought me a 58 Devin to run the exhaust. It was rather rough but he had found and mounted a factory turbocharger. It was a 50s-60s built sports car. I ran the exhaust from the turbo. It wasn't running so I never found out how it ran. I doubt he ever got it running. I really wanted that car. It was rough but very cool...especially with the aluminum V8.
     
  22. Smith79
    Joined: Feb 8, 2007
    Posts: 171

    Smith79
    Member

    i saw one transplanted into an older triumph once, wasn't to into the car but was super curious about the engine, the owner told me a little about it, i'm pretty sure it was a buick.
     
  23. MyBootsOnFire
    Joined: Mar 15, 2004
    Posts: 181

    MyBootsOnFire
    Member

    Sorry for the plug, but my buddy has one for sale in the classifieds rite now. I think they're bitchin motors and would look great all polished up in a hoodless car.
     
  24. plym_46
    Joined: Sep 8, 2005
    Posts: 4,018

    plym_46
    Member
    from central NY

    Rover Sedans Imported to the US also had them also with two stromberg side drafts on a crossed manifold.

    Rover 3500 1967 through 75 or so

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    also in TR8's although this looks to have updated intake stuff.

    [​IMG]
     
  25. FoMoCoPower
    Joined: Feb 2, 2007
    Posts: 2,493

    FoMoCoPower
    Member

    I believe the Triumph TR8 came stock with one in the early `80`s....and they were used in Land Rover`s up until very recently.
     
  26. Toast
    Joined: Jan 6, 2007
    Posts: 3,885

    Toast
    Member
    from Jenks, OK

    I have one in this 62 Buick, runs great, Got a 2X2 intake and a couple of 4 bolt Strombergs i'm just about to put on it, and some cool finned aluminum stuff too. [​IMG]
     
  27. dezaster
    Joined: Oct 21, 2005
    Posts: 162

    dezaster
    Member
    from u.k.

    i think its quite funny you guys are so hot over them, on the 'rod scene over here theyre pretty much dirt(the rover version anyway), everyones pulling them and fitting american v8s instead!
    theyre a good motor really, best in small lightweight cars as theyre about the same in weight as your average iron 4 pot, they were never too hot on quality control though.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.