Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical 289 intake weirdness

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by sparky232, Nov 7, 2021.

  1. sparky232
    Joined: Jun 22, 2010
    Posts: 72

    sparky232
    Member

    Anyone ever encounter this? Putting together a 289 for a buddy who has had the parts stashed since the late 70s/ early 80s. Not really sure what the deal is and haven’t found any info online. Am I having a brain fart senior moment way too soon? AAC3B669-27F1-4951-8860-A147101B553E.jpeg
     
    tommyd and dana barlow like this.
  2. Yep, that's the way some heads were cast. For the guys that don't believe in torque wrenches, the leading cause of breaking off that corner of the intake...
     
  3. Fords love 'em or hate 'em they were Fords. :D
     
    lothiandon1940 and sparky232 like this.
  4. tommyd
    Joined: Dec 10, 2010
    Posts: 11,960

    tommyd
    Member
    from South Indy

    Normal sbf Ford stuff. Good to go.
     
    sparky232 likes this.

  5. Oilguy
    Joined: Jun 28, 2011
    Posts: 663

    Oilguy
    Member

    I did a Google and found several others like that. As Crazy said, use the correct torque specs. Looks like you could easily snap it off. But I don't know squat about Fords.
     
    sparky232 likes this.
  6. Budget36
    Joined: Nov 29, 2014
    Posts: 13,275

    Budget36
    Member

    You’d think a wedged spacer would be made for that.
     
    lothiandon1940 and sparky232 like this.
  7. Truck64
    Joined: Oct 18, 2015
    Posts: 5,325

    Truck64
    Member
    from Ioway

    That would cost another $ 0.04, are you nuts?!
     
  8. Moedog07
    Joined: Apr 11, 2011
    Posts: 507

    Moedog07
    Member

    Cast iron intakes from the factory don't tend to break there. Even if the factory had made a spacer some gearhead would toss it during an intake change.
     
  9. Budget36
    Joined: Nov 29, 2014
    Posts: 13,275

    Budget36
    Member

    I get ya. But was thinking Mr Gasket, etc would have seen a way to make a buck.
     
    lothiandon1940 and sparky232 like this.
  10. It would be way to easy to make your own I wouldn't do it.:confused::eek:o_O:rolleyes:
     
  11. sparky232
    Joined: Jun 22, 2010
    Posts: 72

    sparky232
    Member

    I was considering making a wedge spacer out of some tubing but didn’t want it to look hokey. I just won’t get he man on the intake bolts and check torque specs.
    Little backstory, he disassembled his 65 comet in 1977 and it never went back together. All new now semi vintage speed parts going back together finally now that we are putting it back together. We meaning me, he’s in a home and can’t turn wrenches anymore.
     

    Attached Files:

    tommyd, lothiandon1940 and Oilguy like this.
  12. JeffB2
    Joined: Dec 18, 2006
    Posts: 9,504

    JeffB2
    Member
    from Phoenix,AZ

    Curious as to what casting number your heads are ? My 302 has 289 Hi-Po C5OE-B heads and no gap there maybe check here about casting numbers http://www.mre-books.com/interchange/interchange5.html
     
  13. With a aluminum intake, you do want to lower the factory torque number and make sure you use the factory pattern. I'll sneak up on it, starting at 10 ft-lbs, going up in 2 lb increments until you hit 18 ft-lbs, repeat this twice then stop.

    Using the cast-iron number and tightening in one operation is how you break these...
     
  14. I'll bet I know what happened, you got the heads on backward. :rolleyes::D:D:D:D
     
  15. sparky232
    Joined: Jun 22, 2010
    Posts: 72

    sparky232
    Member

    Thought I had a pic of the casting, but nope. I’ll check next time I’m over there.
     
  16. sparky232
    Joined: Jun 22, 2010
    Posts: 72

    sparky232
    Member

    Ha! Of course!
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.