Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical 1940 ford cross member

Discussion in 'Traditional Hot Rods' started by rustyrods, Nov 7, 2016.

  1. rustyrods
    Joined: Jun 14, 2005
    Posts: 364

    rustyrods
    Member
    from Dixon,Il.

    Is it true that there were two cross members for 40 Fords. They are 1 1/2 "different in depth as I can see. Has anyone run in to this .
     
  2. LOU WELLS
    Joined: Jan 24, 2010
    Posts: 2,791

    LOU WELLS
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from IDAHO

    There is no difference as far as the passenger car and commercial vehicle (pickup and sedan delivery)....
     
  3. 31Apickup
    Joined: Nov 8, 2005
    Posts: 3,379

    31Apickup
    Member

    There is the 41 pickup front crossmember which has a different shape so they could use the new for 41 Six cylinder engine.
     
  4. 35-40 car and pickup same same
    At least they are supposed to be until you post pics and show us different.
     

  5. 40's had the same frames, car and pickup except for the body mounts on the frame rails. The six cylinder did not come out until 41. My pickup has the 1CG prefix VIN and the front crossmember with a steeper bend.
    The vertical sections are at 90° to the spring seat section.
     
    LOU WELLS likes this.
  6. Marty Strode
    Joined: Apr 28, 2011
    Posts: 8,915

    Marty Strode
    Member

    My engine test stand has a '41 pickup crossmember. IMG_0589.JPG
     
  7. rustyrods
    Joined: Jun 14, 2005
    Posts: 364

    rustyrods
    Member
    from Dixon,Il.

    I got another cross member from a 1939 and it's 1 1/2 inch shallow compared to the one in my truck. It would in a since lower the truck that much.
     
    LTM75110 likes this.
  8. flatjack
    Joined: Feb 13, 2007
    Posts: 975

    flatjack
    Member

    All crossmembers are NOT the same. There are differences in the engine mounting area for one thing. My 36 roadster sits on a 39 frame and I had to change the crossmember because the engine sat too high.
     
  9. rustyrods
    Joined: Jun 14, 2005
    Posts: 364

    rustyrods
    Member
    from Dixon,Il.

    Flatjack You are right.
     
  10. albertaboy
    Joined: Jul 19, 2013
    Posts: 131

    albertaboy
    Member

    I pulled this deep cross from my 40 pick up. It was bolted in so it's my belief it was a replacement from a 1941, 6 cyl model.
     

    Attached Files:

    LOU WELLS likes this.
  11. typo41
    Joined: Jul 8, 2011
    Posts: 2,571

    typo41
    Member Emeritus

    Many years ago in the Dark Ages,, Frank Oddo wrote about the differences, I believe in was in a Rod and Custom Quarterly. The 'dropped' cross member was the hot ticket for a Ford into a Forty swap.
    Not seen too often.
     
    LOU WELLS likes this.
  12. LOU WELLS
    Joined: Jan 24, 2010
    Posts: 2,791

    LOU WELLS
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from IDAHO

    Thanks for your great memory and the build was a 39 convert that he was doing with a Windsor Ford in a 39-40 application using the Bronco pan to not cut the stock firewall.........
     
    warbird1 likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.