Register now to get rid of these ads!

1953 Bel Air engine swap

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by 1953 Rat, Feb 24, 2009.

  1. 1953 Rat
    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Posts:
    46
    Location:
    Fountain Hills, AZ

    1953 Rat Member

    I have a question and I am hoping all of you may have some advice for me. I have a 1953 Bel Air and i purchased a 1955 265 small block, This engine doesnt have side mount motor mounts. All of the V8 swap kits i have been able to find are designed for 1958 and later small blocks with the side mounts. I was told to get a bellhousing with the integrated motor mounts from a 55 to 57 chevy. I now have one of these and i am looking for the frame bracket that mounts to the frame that the readily available rubber mounts (for the bellhousing side) bolt to. Where can I find these brackets? I saw these brackets on a 55 to 57 chevy's but the frame seems to be wider than a 1953 frame. Will they work, or will I need to fabricate something that will work. Also will I have to run a transmission cross member or will the use of the mid motor mounts eliminate this. I have heard conflicting opinions on this. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thank you very much
  2. atomickustom
    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2005
    Posts:
    2,700
    Location:
    Joplin, Missouri

    atomickustom Member

    I think what you need is a FRONT mount. It'll bolt to the front of the motor toward the bottom and extend out on either side. There'll be a rubber donut bushing at each end, which will bolt onto a bracket that you'll have to bolt or weld to your frame. That's how my Dad had a 265 in his '50 Ford.
    Try Speedway Motors, try J.C. Whitney, and if those don't work try Googling it. Someone somewhere must still sell them.
  3. wayfarer
    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2003
    Posts:
    1,751
    Location:
    Spokane, WA

    wayfarer
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Speedway has a front mount setup for small blocks in these cars. I used one in my '53 wagon. I have some pictures in my album.
  4. 1953 Rat
    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Posts:
    46
    Location:
    Fountain Hills, AZ

    1953 Rat Member

    Ah yes i already have the front mount kit from trans dapt. Will I need to use the bellhousing mid mounts or just the fronts and a trans cross member for the rear support?
    Register now to get rid of these ads!

  5. propwash
    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2005
    Posts:
    3,837
    Location:
    Las Vegas

    propwash Member

    do NOT use only the front saddle mount and a tranny crossmember mount. The engine/trans assembly will sag in the middle and you'll have all kinds of problems. You will probably have to fabricate the mating mount brackets for the frame (at the bellhousing mounts. Your choice on also using a crossmember mount - certainly much stronger, but a few years of Chevys with Cast Iron PGs made it with only the front engine mount and the side bellhousing mounts
  6. Dustyoldbodyman
    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2006
    Posts:
    579
    Location:
    The People's Republic of Farmington Hills

    Dustyoldbodyman Member

    Interesting that you picked on of the most scarce SBC engines in the mix - but I'm not posting to chastise your engine choice - run what ya brung.
    I happen to know the guy responsible for figuring out where the "Side mount" engine mounts needed to be when Chevrolet decided to eliminate the problems they were having with the first gen mounting system. Meanwhile, I would suggest finding a side mount 283 and a new home for the 265 - someone restoring a 55 or 56 (anyone left?) :eek:
    Bottom line is side mounts work a lot better at load distribution and harmonic dampening, do not NEED bell housing mounts and can be used with a trans tail housing mount (all side mount SBCs are this way)
    Besides - drill out that 283 to 331 and put a nice little lopey cam and some 10 or 11 to 1 pistons and have a great setup! - then again what do I know...:cool:
  7. 1953 Rat
    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Posts:
    46
    Location:
    Fountain Hills, AZ

    1953 Rat Member

    I would like to have side mounts but i dont. I have a 383 stroker in my nova but that's going to stay there. I got the 265 by chance and dont want to let it go unless the price is right you know? Was it that uncommon for people to put a 265 into a 53? I'd like to think it happened more than a few times.
  8. propwash
    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2005
    Posts:
    3,837
    Location:
    Las Vegas

    propwash Member

    Very popular swap back in the late 50s/early60s - but, guys that made the mistake of suspending them front/saddel to rear/tranny dripped lot of oil, cracked lots of bellhousings. There are a few kits out there specifically for this swap, but one that uses the stock 265 front bolt holes has got to be pretty scarce by now. Just face that you'll need to fabricate those frame brackets for the bellhousing mounts, and let'er rip. By the way - a mildly bore 265 out to 272 makes a very sweet sounding mill with a good cam. Most of us 'silverbacks' started with 265s after we realized what ZA-D was providing us with over the counter. I tossed a perfectly good 371 Olds out of a 1936 5w back in 61 just to make room for a 265. Wouldn't do that now, of course, but made sense at the time.

    dj
  9. 1953 Rat
    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Posts:
    46
    Location:
    Fountain Hills, AZ

    1953 Rat Member

    Thanks guys. I'll fire up the welder
  10. jusjunk
    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2004
    Posts:
    3,139
    Location:
    Michigan

    jusjunk BANNED


    I ran a 283 with a hurst style front nount and a turbo 350 and the trans mount with a home made x member for the trans in a 29 model a and it was fine and no wierd vibes... I saw the car 3 or 4 years ago and its still running the same mounts.. I built the thing over 25 years ago!...
    Dave
  11. 1953 Rat
    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Posts:
    46
    Location:
    Fountain Hills, AZ

    1953 Rat Member

    Yeah i saw a post about the Hurst style front mount and a kick ass CAD drawing about it in the archives. Its good to hear that i may have more than one option. Its funny, i never expected to go this far into it but like all things its never what it seems
  12. cavistyle
    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2008
    Posts:
    457
    Location:
    baltimore

    cavistyle Member

    anyone use any of the universal style mounts from speedway
  13. R Pope
    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2006
    Posts:
    2,969
    Location:
    Saskatchewan

    R Pope Member

    I ran a 283/three speed OD with front mount and tailstock trans mount without any problems. Of course, it had a cast iron bellhousing, not aluminum.
  14. Customline Vicky
    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2008
    Posts:
    1,291
    Location:
    Havana FL (Tallahassee)

    Customline Vicky Member

    Can folks still get those plastic blocks to use settin' up motors like this?
  15. Gauder the goof
    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2005
    Posts:
    392
    Location:
    Windsor, Ontario Canada

    Gauder the goof
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

  16. pasadenahotrod
    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2007
    Posts:
    11,749
    Location:
    Texas

    pasadenahotrod Member

    My son's 57 BelAir has the original peg mounts up front, aftermarket bellhousing mounts in back AND a trans mount out at the end of the tailshaft too.
    It just looked too nervous to me to suspend that much weight along that much distance on an aluminum trans bellhousing when I changed the transmission.
    The old Hurst saddle mount has the mount ears down near the frame whereas the early 'Vette mount has the ears up midline cause the 'Vette had mount towers.

    The intermediate mounts aren't too complicated and bolt into the frame where the originals did on the 57 engine/trans then to the mounting flange of the trans/engine.
    Pretty simple but require space for the biscuits, naturally.
  17. Customline Vicky
    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2008
    Posts:
    1,291
    Location:
    Havana FL (Tallahassee)

    Customline Vicky Member

  18. 1953 Rat
    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Posts:
    46
    Location:
    Fountain Hills, AZ

    1953 Rat Member

    So if the bellhousing I have is cast iron then i shouldn't have to worry about it breaking holding up that much weight. Using only front mounts and a trans mount? Yeah that plastic engine seems all sorts of helpful maybe i'll use that to find where the mounts need to be.
  19. kurts49plym
    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2007
    Posts:
    384
    Location:
    IL

    kurts49plym Member

    Use front mounts and the 55-57 bellhousing. Don't bother with a trans mount as you won't be drag racing. The nice thing (if I remember right) is the 265 exhaust manifolds may work good in your swap. Seems to me the steering box is in the way of a standard dump manifold-but you can check that out. That would be a neat swap keeping the stock oil bath air cleaner and valve covers. Good luck
  20. 53sled
    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2005
    Posts:
    5,822
    Location:
    KCMO

    53sled Member

    find an early 80s truck caprice or camaro (305 most likely) for the driverside and use a rams horn on the passenger side. the 265 exhaust is tiny. I'm using the whole 305 roller cam motor, truck 11" clutch and a sag 4 speed. It seems a mid mount on the driver side would be in the way of the clutch linkage.
    you don't have to completely remove the firewall ribs, just trim to fit, I can measure anything you may need as I am almost finished with mine. I mounted it about as far back as you can w/o firewall surgery.
  21. 1953 Rat
    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Posts:
    46
    Location:
    Fountain Hills, AZ

    1953 Rat Member

    Yeah any measurements you have would be useful! I am planning on keeping the original manifolds that came with the engine if I can, but if not i have a set of ram horns that will get the go if needed. Hey sled do you have any pics of yours? Yeah I'm looking forward to seeing an oil bath cleaner and a tp oil filter! between the fenders.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2013 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.