Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical we need a dedicated 261 thread.

Discussion in 'Traditional Hot Rods' started by hotdamn, Apr 5, 2011.

  1. Snarl
    Joined: Feb 16, 2007
    Posts: 1,639

    Snarl
    Member

    if its a '59-63 261 block with the 1/2"NPT connections and the pin in the "out" position, then yes.
    Both lines attach to the same galley, but if the pin is in the "in" position, then it blocks that galley and forces the oil out the front fitting and into the filter, then back into the block at the rear fitting.
     
  2. 91whitestang
    Joined: Oct 6, 2009
    Posts: 232

    91whitestang
    Member
    from Wisconsin

    Hey snarl, thanks for the info. I'm kind of lost on what you mean by pin? If its in or out? Could you explain to me how to tell if the pin is in or out or where to find that at? Its a 61 261 motor. Thanks jeff.
     
    Last edited: Jul 12, 2011
  3. 91whitestang
    Joined: Oct 6, 2009
    Posts: 232

    91whitestang
    Member
    from Wisconsin

    Its a new melling oil pumpthat I put in. I still have the old pump, should I drop the pan and put the old pump back in? I just figured if I tore it apart to clean, I might as well drop a new pump in at the same time. Thanks for any input.
     
  4. Cosmo49
    Joined: Jan 15, 2007
    Posts: 1,555

    Cosmo49
    Member

    Above the barbed fitting on the left. Must be in the IN position for full flow oil filtering.


    [​IMG]
     
  5. 91whitestang
    Joined: Oct 6, 2009
    Posts: 232

    91whitestang
    Member
    from Wisconsin

    Here is what my pin looks like currently....

    Is that considered to be the IN position or OUT position?
     

    Attached Files:

  6. Snarl
    Joined: Feb 16, 2007
    Posts: 1,639

    Snarl
    Member

    It is in the out (flush with the end of the block) position, which is bypass filtration. Moving the pin in about 1/2" to get full flow filtration is a big PITA. I've heard of guys breaking the block trying to do it. Your call.....

    changing the oil pump isn't relevant to anything. There is nothing wrong anyway....
     
  7. hotdamn
    Joined: Aug 25, 2006
    Posts: 2,387

    hotdamn
    Member

    hey snarl is this something I should have my machine shop do when I am getting the block done?
     
  8. hotdamn
    Joined: Aug 25, 2006
    Posts: 2,387

    hotdamn
    Member

    okay guys how about this, lets do this tech style.
    If you have gotten some proven hp out of your 261 post and itemize what you did!

    so that way we can have a clear cut list and we can compare what works best?

    I know someone earlier posted they can get 320 ft lbs of torque with out getting to radical.
     
  9. 91whitestang
    Joined: Oct 6, 2009
    Posts: 232

    91whitestang
    Member
    from Wisconsin

    Thanks Snarl for letting me know its in bypass filteration. Well, I could try to push the pin in, or what if I plugged the upper back oil line and then ran the line back into the pan, if I drilled and bun the pan to flow the oil back into the pan?

    I'd hope that the pin would move with ease....so that would make this less of a headache. But if worse comes to worse, I was thinking of option 2 with having the return line go into the pan.
     
  10. Curt B
    Joined: Oct 15, 2009
    Posts: 325

    Curt B
    Member


    I got as far as making a flow bench adapter plate and nozzle, cutting up a head thru several planes to determine wall thickness, milling various areas of the port and chamber with <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com<img src=" /><st1:stockticker>CNC</st1:stockticker> repeatability, and testing results. Next is documenting the benefit of the larger powerglide intake valves along with chamber mods to improve exhaust flow and later see what a dyno shows. So far I can say with some certainty that the well known mod of plunging a shell reamer in from the manifold side does not help but reduces velocity and increases turbulence by making the sharp turn at the sides even worse. As well after cutting apart many different oil filters the “full flow” thing is not exactly true either as dirty oil will go on by without you knowing about it. Pic’s of head sectioning are in the album in my signature and I wish I had more time for it.
     
  11. Cosmo49
    Joined: Jan 15, 2007
    Posts: 1,555

    Cosmo49
    Member

  12. Snarl
    Joined: Feb 16, 2007
    Posts: 1,639

    Snarl
    Member


    I would.

    On mine, I had to drill it out. I then tapped the hole for a pipe plug and made my own pin that didn't require a press fit. This way, I could take it apart if I ever needed to without issues. It's entirely up to you how you want to handle it.
     
  13. Snarl
    Joined: Feb 16, 2007
    Posts: 1,639

    Snarl
    Member


    There really isn't anything you would do to a 261 that is any different than what you would do to a 235 when talking about performance mods.
     
  14. Snarl
    Joined: Feb 16, 2007
    Posts: 1,639

    Snarl
    Member

    You're over thinking it. Having a line dump into the pan isn't going to get you anywhere. That's what a 235 does.

    54-58 261 and all 235's are bypass oilers. These engines all have the small oil lines with one line pressurized to the filter, an orifice in the canister to control flow, and a return line that just dumps into the oil pan.

    59-63 261's when setup for bypass filtration have basically both oil lines going into the oil galley. Whatever oil wants to go through the filter does, and the rest just continues on to the bearings. This is the better way to go than just dumping into the pan.

    what are you using for a filter setup? the stock unit or an aftermarket spin-on filter?
     
  15. Snarl
    Joined: Feb 16, 2007
    Posts: 1,639

    Snarl
    Member

  16. 91whitestang
    Joined: Oct 6, 2009
    Posts: 232

    91whitestang
    Member
    from Wisconsin

    Im using an aftermarket spin on filter. I do hand have the old original canister that bolted on my manifold but running a header now so I bought the oil filter relocation kit from summit or jegs. Thanks, jeff.
     
  17. Snarl
    Joined: Feb 16, 2007
    Posts: 1,639

    Snarl
    Member

    if you do move the pin in, the front line will hook up to the "in" side of your filter head.

    If you can, its best to mount it low. like off the frame, rather than up high.

    good luck!
     
  18. 91whitestang
    Joined: Oct 6, 2009
    Posts: 232

    91whitestang
    Member
    from Wisconsin

    Thanks Snarl, hoping for the best on having it move. I do have the filter mounted low on the frame right now, so thats a plus too. Worse case scenario, if the pin doesn't want to move, should the bypass setup still work the way it is with the pin the way it is?
     
  19. Truckedup
    Joined: Jul 25, 2006
    Posts: 4,660

    Truckedup
    Member

    I tried to move a pin in...no go....like how hard to you want to pound on it before you break the block????
    I drilled the center of the pin to weaken it,then pulled it out and tapped the hole to 9/16 fine ( I have this tap for GMC oil filter conversion) Then cut off a bolt and threaded it in.I suppose I could have just driven in the pin after driiling it and tapping the pin for a plug.Just didn't think that way at the time....Duh
     
  20. 91whitestang
    Joined: Oct 6, 2009
    Posts: 232

    91whitestang
    Member
    from Wisconsin

    Thats some good info, thanks a lot. Im mainly concerned like you said, how hard do you hit it before something cracks or something? Ill be checking it in a little bit when I get there, see how hard or freely it will move.
     
    trucker1 likes this.
  21. 6inarow
    Joined: Jan 24, 2007
    Posts: 2,363

    6inarow
    Member

    the pins are almost all stuck. plan on it not moving
     
  22. 91whitestang
    Joined: Oct 6, 2009
    Posts: 232

    91whitestang
    Member
    from Wisconsin

    Should I even bother trying to get it to move then? Or what would you reccomend doing?

    If left where it is, will there be to much pressure going to the screw on oil filter? Thats why I was thinking of plugging the upper one, so that oil came out the bottom line in to filter and back out to the oil pan. Or would it be better to drill and tap it like another guy did on here to restrict the oil that way?

    Sorry for all the questions, just trying to do this the right way the first time without causing any problems hopefully, and with me being the newbie, you guys are very helpful and i appreciate all the info you may have to share. Jeff
     
  23. 91whitestang
    Joined: Oct 6, 2009
    Posts: 232

    91whitestang
    Member
    from Wisconsin

    Must have gotten lucky, thing moved with ease, barley had to hit. Thanks for the info and help guys, im sure ill have more questions to come haha. Jeff
     
  24. CrkInsp
    Joined: Jul 17, 2006
    Posts: 513

    CrkInsp
    Member
    from B.A. OK

    After breaking a couple blocks trying to move the pin years ago, I would do as "Cosmo49"s tech tip suggests. It has the advantage of being removeable during rebuilds to clean the oil passages.
     
  25. Snarl
    Joined: Feb 16, 2007
    Posts: 1,639

    Snarl
    Member


    It will work just fine with it where it is. Just change the oil a little more often.

    If I were to try and push it in, I'd have the pan off and make up some kind of c-clamp style press, and heat up the block around it beforehand. Like I and others have said, leave it alone or drill it out....

    Since you got it to move, you won't need to worry about it!
     
    Last edited: Jul 14, 2011
  26. hotdamn
    Joined: Aug 25, 2006
    Posts: 2,387

    hotdamn
    Member

    so who got exp with using blowers/superchargers or turbos on these guys? :D
     
  27. Just finished installing a rebuilt 261 engine in my '55. Its now a great driver.
     

    Attached Files:

    • 001.jpg
      001.jpg
      File size:
      457.8 KB
      Views:
      335
    • 002.jpg
      002.jpg
      File size:
      499.6 KB
      Views:
      332
  28. First I have to say that this thread is great!

    After that I have some questions!

    I have a 54-55 261 from a 1st series 55 truck!
    If I want do put the 261 in my 55 chevy (car) what problems will I get?

    Motormounts will not fit, but I can make new ones

    Waterpump! , there is much info and parts to put a newer engine in older car, but no info about putting older engine in newer car! Can I make a spacer and use 55-235 pulleys and fan?

    Oilpan and oilpump! Can I use from 55-235?
     
  29. Truckedup
    Joined: Jul 25, 2006
    Posts: 4,660

    Truckedup
    Member

    Stuff that bolts to the outside of 235 all fits the 261.Early water pumps bolt on 55 and up blocks with an adapter,pay attention to pulley sizes to maintain proper water pump speed.
    The 261 block is on the stand in my shop.Zero decked Ross forged pistons,cam just sent off to Oregon Cam Grinding.Got a GMC oil pump I'm gonna install,maybe...Pump is longer so I need to modify the oil pan.The stock Chevy pump is ok,just messing with stuff.
    Block had to go .080 to clean up . Made a few crude tools to poke around through water passages trying to measure cylinder wall thickness.I suppose sonic testing is easier but 200 more bucks.....Appears at .080 the cylinder thinnest area is around .140 on non thrust surfaces.Should be just fine for a street engine.Taking these blocks .125 over like they used to do can be risky business I think
     
    Last edited: Nov 4, 2011
  30. Truckedup
    Joined: Jul 25, 2006
    Posts: 4,660

    Truckedup
    Member

    Here's the 261 and the Ross Pistons. Pistons are zero decked,the intake valve notch is about 4.5 cc's. 848 head I checked at 79 cc's comes out to an actual 8.9 compression..I put in the crank earlier.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    CGkidd likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.