Register now to get rid of these ads!

Very interesting engine!

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Flat Roy, Oct 22, 2008.

  1. Flat Roy
    Joined: Nov 23, 2007
    Posts: 533

    Flat Roy

  2. 400 HP @ 10,000 rpm with "street cams" one hell of a top end in a light car! Wonder what that sounds like?
  3. stude_trucks
    Joined: Sep 13, 2007
    Posts: 4,755


  4. Fiorano
    Joined: Nov 22, 2007
    Posts: 212


    just wicked-
    a UK based company makes one as well at 2.6 liters though...
    it is wider and less custom.
    the H1 is sick

  5. loogy
    Joined: Mar 6, 2004
    Posts: 1,234


    $30,000 ???
  6. Pir8Darryl
    Joined: Jan 9, 2008
    Posts: 2,488


    :eek: Yea! What he said!

    Slick little motor tho. If I ever win the lotto, I'll buy one and put it in a riced out Kia Rio, and go hunting Z-06 corvettes! :D
  7. Belchfire8
    Joined: Sep 18, 2005
    Posts: 1,541


    245 Ft. Lbs. of torque at 7500 thanks, my 429 does that at idle I think.......:D
  8. kma4444
    Joined: Sep 24, 2008
    Posts: 197


    Uses two Suzuki Hayabusa heads. There's a few different manufacturers of similar bits, pretty cool.
  9. Pauly da mick
    Joined: Nov 14, 2006
    Posts: 245

    Pauly da mick

    Very nice!!:cool:

    I wonder if they could make me a V16 for that BRM like scream?!:D
  10. stude_trucks
    Joined: Sep 13, 2007
    Posts: 4,755


    Probably not far off. But don't forget the 429 probably weighs about 3-4 times a much. And, I doubt the 429 makes anywhere near 2+ hp per cubic inch like this does.

    This certainly isn't an engine for too many people, myself included, but seems pretty darn cool for what it is and does sound like it might have some ass-kicking inside it.
  11. Dreddybear
    Joined: Mar 31, 2007
    Posts: 6,044


    That little Caterham Hauls balls. Ugly as sin though.
  12. Abomination
    Joined: Oct 5, 2006
    Posts: 6,717


    They're "just under $30k".

    Here's what one sounds like:

    <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value=""></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
  13. Yuck.
  14. dieselc
    Joined: May 17, 2004
    Posts: 1,315

    from ohio

    It sounds like a screamer, ugly but a screamer.
  15. Sounds like a chain saw. Wonder what it would do with twin turbos?

    I'd rather have an engine that sounds cool and has tons of torque.
  16. Belchfire8
    Joined: Sep 18, 2005
    Posts: 1,541


    Yup, nice piece of engineering, but even in a light car how often are you going to be able to hit 7,500 R.P.M. much less 10,000? And of course with all that engineering applied to a 429 you'll end up with 2+ h.p. per cubic inches, but it would also be in a R.P.M. range that you actually drive......:)
  17. Revhead
    Joined: Mar 19, 2001
    Posts: 3,027

    from Dallas, TX

    umm Honda makes a production car with 9k rpm limit.. so I don't think hitting 7500 rpm is that hard. just all depends on gearing.
  18. Devin
    Joined: Dec 28, 2004
    Posts: 2,369

    from Napa, CA

    As was stated, it doesnt really belong in traditional rod, but holy shit that Caterham must be a rush to drive. I think it's great for it's intended purpose.
  19. Stone
    Joined: Nov 24, 2003
    Posts: 2,279


  20. Belchfire8
    Joined: Sep 18, 2005
    Posts: 1,541


    Yup, gotta spin them little guys to make any power, I'm an American, gimme TORQUE!!!! :D
  21. Dam! Sounded like the motor was gonna blow on the dyno! Wonder what kinda mileage you could squeeze outta one of these in a car that weighed under 3,000 lbs....
  22. stagernwings
    Joined: Dec 9, 2007
    Posts: 187

    from tx

    i like it ,the looks and sound is just right. i want mine in a 32 ford with a 6 speed no automatics and a aluminum chassis with a winters rear . 1800 lbs max . now thats a hot rod .c
  23. 50Fraud
    Joined: May 6, 2001
    Posts: 10,059


    I useta have a Lotus Super 7 (same as a Caterham -- when Lotus quit making them, Caterham bought the design) with a 1340 cc pushrod Ford engine in it. 81 cubic inches, right around 100 hp, in a car that weighed right on 1000 pounds. Amazingly fast car; I cannot imagine what it would be like with 400+ hp.

  24. TraderJack
    Joined: Apr 10, 2008
    Posts: 330


    My goodness, very impressive pictures of the engine in productions. who would have thought it that you would just machine a crankcase out of a billet of aluminum.
    Fantastic pictures. Love that new crank!

    $28,000 is cheap for that thing.

  25. A-Wall
    Joined: Aug 6, 2008
    Posts: 488


    wow, that is awesome! Would love to get my hands on one of those for a project. I had a 422whp engine that reved to 8500rpm. 2.4L that got over 35 mpg and ran mid 11s on pump gas. Not gonna say what kinda car tho... LOL
  26. I bet it feels like a gutless pile off idle. I'll stick to my Pontiac 400. 0-60 mph in 3.2 seconds. Beat that. That engine is the size of a damned 2 ltr pop bottle. No thanks!! Torque is what you like to feel!!
  27. 11secgen
    Joined: Oct 11, 2006
    Posts: 81


    lol @ the video in post #12.those guys are hauling a$$ on a road course in that caterham without helmets.and, its not every day people from the hamb say hey, thats not safe!
  28. Phil1934
    Joined: Jun 24, 2001
    Posts: 2,717


    More common than you'd think Norwood is running these guys' BBC based 4 cylinder on nitro
  29. stude_trucks
    Joined: Sep 13, 2007
    Posts: 4,755


    Ooh, wee, it's not even considered an order until they get a $4K deposit. I don't see any block prices, but might make the $28K of this motor seem pretty cheap.

    I am starting to really like this thread because it is beginning to make the cost of my 392 hemi seem like a bargain.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!


Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.