Register now to get rid of these ads!

tube shocks vs lever

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by j32, Sep 4, 2010.

  1. j32
    Joined: May 11, 2009
    Posts: 68


    Hi guys , I have a question about tube shocks and lever shocks. Im
    building a 34 ford pu with a flathead and now working on the front suspension. I have a hooded tube shock mocked up and it doesn't look
    quite right.....I think a lever shock would look more the part but I don't
    know if they would work ok on something that was going to be driven
    often. Thanks for your help.

  2. JohnEvans
    Joined: Apr 13, 2008
    Posts: 4,883

    from Phoenix AZ

    Lever shocks in good condition work just fine. I've ran several cars using Armstrong lever shocks from the rear of a MG Midget, compact and work well on a rod.
  3. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 13,401


    There is a reason why they disappeared after the hydraulic tube shock came around.

    They do work, but not so well when compared to something like a Bilstein or even a lesser brand.

    Try a set of tube shocks without the hoods.
  4. tommy
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 14,763

    Member Emeritus

    The early Ford shocks can be expensive when compared to the normal tube shocks. Not only the rebuilt shocks but the arms, links and shackle bolts can add up, but if the look is worth it to ya, go for it. They say 40s to me. By the early 60s they were mostly gone on hot rods.
    Register now to get rid of these ads!

  5. F&J
    Joined: Apr 5, 2007
    Posts: 11,602


    if you find old levers, make sure they are dual action. The real early autos used single action... no damping in one direction.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!


Copyright © 1995-2013 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.