Register now to get rid of these ads!

to s10 frame or not to s10 frame that is thee question

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by mater, Dec 30, 2010.

  1. mater
    Joined: Dec 22, 2010
    Posts: 87

    mater
    Member
    from Minnesota

    still pondering the idea of the s10 frame swap for mater the 57 international any thoughts HAMBER's
     
  2. Gerg
    Joined: Feb 27, 2006
    Posts: 1,828

    Gerg
    Member

    What is wrong with the original frame. What are you trying to do with it get it low or just wanting to make a ton of work for yourself?
     
  3. F&J
    Joined: Apr 5, 2007
    Posts: 13,222

    F&J
    Member


    This is more like thinking that a frame swap is easier than making motor mounts, etc etc.

    This thread might get closed, as there seems to be a more strict enforcement of what the board should be.
     
  4. 6berry
    Joined: Apr 12, 2009
    Posts: 352

    6berry
    Member

    depending on how your original frame and your main goal are the two main questions. in my case the original frame was rusted out as well as all the body mounts and i wanted to lay frame so i went with the s10 swap. i think it was the better option for me because i would have had to repair then modify the original frame and i got an s10 frame already set up for air bags and it was the correct wheel base
     

  5. willowbilly3
    Joined: Jun 18, 2004
    Posts: 4,356

    willowbilly3
    Member Emeritus
    from Sturgis

    If that frame is front steer like my 54, then the steering column is a big issue for engine clearance. I'm too lazy to do anything like a frame swap so I'm just freshening up the original stuff on mine. I figure I can shoehorn a 302 into it and plan to use the Speedway front cross member.
     
  6. mater
    Joined: Dec 22, 2010
    Posts: 87

    mater
    Member
    from Minnesota

    just thinking of long run and parts availability the motor mounts seem like cake to me never done them but done plenty of welding probly start on them tomorrow try to get some progress pics on tonight.
     
  7. nico32
    Joined: Oct 30, 2008
    Posts: 716

    nico32
    Member
    from fdl, wi

  8. Gerg
    Joined: Feb 27, 2006
    Posts: 1,828

    Gerg
    Member

    I am not sure about wheel base is it the same ? that might be another hurdle you are looking at I am not trying to change your mind just would rather help you make sure everything is going to work before jumping headlong into this project get discouraged and quitting
     
  9. A couple of thoughts here. First, the original frame and body were designed to bolt together and you don't have to fabricate body mounts and don't have as many issues with getting body panels to fit and line up right. Like most older trucks, you're dealing with a straight ladder type frame that lends itself to just about any suspension and drive train you want to hang on it. If you want independent front suspension, one possibility is what's under an '80s Ford Aerostar van, whole thing unbolts from the donor vehicle, likewise '60-'66 Chevy/GMC pickup front end, but I'd look at the Aerostar as it comes with rack and pinion and disc brakes, parts are readily available, and any tire store can align it. Chassis Engineering has mounts to put nearly any engine/trans into nearly any chassis. I think drivetrain and suspension upgrades to the frame you have will be easier in the long run that a full chassis swap. Also, I don't remember if old Internationals have the serial number on the cab or if it's only on the frame. If it's only on the frame, a chassis swap might make title/registration issues more complicated.
     
  10. mater
    Joined: Dec 22, 2010
    Posts: 87

    mater
    Member
    from Minnesota

    I kinda figured on keeping the good old frame but wondered if anyone could convince me otherwise thanks for the input all and hope to be of some assistance to others someday got some pics in album finally.
     
  11. oldolds
    Joined: Oct 18, 2010
    Posts: 3,408

    oldolds
    Member

    Don't do it. It will look like an elephant on a roller scate. S-10 is too skinny for that truck. The frame can handle most motors you want to put in it. If you want IFS try the Jag thing or maybe even the front crossmember off a mid 70's - 80's Chevy truck. They unbolt and I think the cornbinder is wide enough.
     
  12. Terraizer
    Joined: Jul 18, 2006
    Posts: 521

    Terraizer
    Member

    The S-10 track width is way to narrow for a L-R-S series International, a Dodge dakota would be a much better fit. A L-R-S series IH are in the 60-61" width stock a S-10 is in the 54" range i beleave a Dakota is in the 60-61" width. I'am clipping my 1955 S-100 with a 1977 Transam clip and a 1967-1972 Ford F-100 rear 9" flip o the stock S series springs. I have the rearend under it and with a 11.5 tire on 15x8 steel wheels, i have about 1/2"-9/16" between the fender and tire, It fits really nice. If i wasen't given the transam clip i would go with a dakota chassis.
     
  13. Captain Chaos
    Joined: Oct 16, 2009
    Posts: 652

    Captain Chaos
    Member
    from Missery

    S-10 frames are junk .
    Keep stock frame , add or clip in a modern suspension on front, maybe a 70-81 camaro or and A body . Measure up 73-87 full size chevy truck, the front unbolts and may lend it self to a simple bolt in .
    Rear is leaf, so anything that is proper width and matches new front bolt pattern can be put in with a set of $18 spring pads
     
  14. biscaynes
    Joined: Mar 16, 2008
    Posts: 1,647

    biscaynes
    Member

  15. These boys are steering you right. You might consider a Fatman front-end, they probally have one made to fit. Just fit it up and weld.
     
  16. mater
    Joined: Dec 22, 2010
    Posts: 87

    mater
    Member
    from Minnesota

    thanks guys just going to put motor in this frame play it by ear from there
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.