Register now to get rid of these ads!

Thinking of switiching from oxy-acetylene to oxy-propane...

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by The Hitch Hiker, May 12, 2010.

  1. The Hitch Hiker
    Joined: Apr 12, 2010
    Posts: 75

    The Hitch Hiker
    Member

    I love my oxy-acetylene cutting torch but acetylene is expensive and doesn't last all that long:(. Does anyone regret going to propane? I heard it burns slightly cooler and uses more oxygen...

    I'm mainly heating up rusted bolts and cutting steel no more than 2/3 inches thick.

    How do you find propane to live with?
     
  2. junk yard kid
    Joined: Nov 11, 2007
    Posts: 2,717

    junk yard kid
    Member

    propanes more sloppy with way more slag, on the plus side you can get a big tank, and if you want to bbq you can just hook it up to your grill
     
  3. lippy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2006
    Posts: 6,826

    lippy
    Member
    from Ks

    Or just cook your burgers with the torch.:D
     
  4. moefuzz
    Joined: Jul 16, 2005
    Posts: 4,950

    moefuzz
    Member

    Propane uses ~3X more oxygen to do the same job

    So if your costs now for oxy acytelene are:

    (your price may vary)

    Acetylene $70
    Oxy $20
    ----------------
    Total $90


    Then figure in changing to propane and using ~3X more oxygen...

    Propane ~$50
    Oxy $20
    Oxy $20
    Oxy $20
    -----------------
    Total $110


    I don't see a savings, Do you?

    Plus, it will take longer to get your job done...
    It will take longer for you to stand there and preheat your metal due to the fact that you have lost considerable BTU's which means you compensate by preheating for longer periods of time while using more gas and oxygene.



    You also loose some of your maximum cutting temperature as well. This makes it harder to make a cut as well as keep the cut running. (oxy/acet burns at a hotter temp than oxy/propane)

    ------------------------

    As others have stated, the cut is sloppy and the slag is much thicker as well as harder to clean.

    -You loose time and you spend more money when you change to propane.


    I work in the Oil and Gas industry in the cold north as a Journeyman welder, my wage is well above $30/hour.

    Up here, 95% of all shops and job sites (the big players) wisely supply their (expensive) Journeyman with the most economical tool that will get the job done without adding extra cost/hours to my already high wage pay check and to the bottom line.


    Looking at it from the other side of the coin, if it really was more economical to use propane then that %95 figure would be reversed.


    One last thing, propane stinks and that smell is very obvious (obnoxious?) when you change to oxy/propane.

    jmho.


    moe

    .
     
    Last edited: May 12, 2010

  5. nofin
    Joined: Jan 7, 2010
    Posts: 321

    nofin
    Member
    from australia

    Propane doesn't burn anywhere near as hot as acetylene, so you have to use a much bigger flame to get the same heat. Also because it does use more oxygen you can get problems with pinholes. On the plus side its much better for soldering or annealing than acetylene, and it's a shitload cheaper. Virtually as effective as oxy/propane (and even better for soldering) is compressed air/propane, but you can't really cut with it.

    Moefuzz: You're right. I forgot the extra oxy cost in the "shitload cheaper" part...
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.