Register now to get rid of these ads!

"The Other 440!"- The late, great '54 to '75 Reo 'Gold Comet' V8!!!.

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by mart3406, Mar 13, 2010.

  1. mart3406
    Joined: May 31, 2009
    Posts: 3,055

    mart3406
    Member
    from Canada

    "The Other 440!"- the late, great '54
    to '75 Reo 'Gold Comet' V8!!! Hmm?? 'Just
    for grins' :)D), I wonder if anyone's ever tried
    hopping-up one of these ol' heavy-duty ol'
    beasts, and t stuffing it between the frame
    rails of a rod??? :eek: :D :D

    Mart3406
    ===========================
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Mar 13, 2010
  2. 73RR
    Joined: Jan 29, 2007
    Posts: 7,204

    73RR
    Member

    The short answer will, of course, be NO! Perhaps you missed the part where it says it weighs 1211 pounds...


    .
     
  3. G V Gordon
    Joined: Oct 29, 2002
    Posts: 5,713

    G V Gordon
    Member
    from Enid OK

    4X6 framerails for a start...
     
  4. mart3406
    Joined: May 31, 2009
    Posts: 3,055

    mart3406
    Member
    from Canada

    --------------------------------
    Did you notice the ''grins' :)D)? They implied
    humor.. I saw one if these engines years ago
    and have seen reference made to them here
    on the HAMB before, but have never seen
    any pics of one or any actual specs or technical
    info on them. When I found these pics
    elsewhere on the net this morning, I posted
    them here, merely for general interest.

    Mart3406
    ======================
     
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2010

  5. draggin breath
    Joined: Feb 5, 2006
    Posts: 509

    draggin breath
    Member

    About 40 years ago had a dumptruck with one that was tired;replaced it with a IHC 549,that was a hunk of iron that hauled ass,truck eventually got a Detroit diesel
     
  6. yardgoat
    Joined: Nov 22, 2009
    Posts: 724

    yardgoat
    Member

    Alot of work went into that design,very heavy duty.Cool place for oil cooler/heater in winter.Has cyl sleaves like a diesel with the water circulates around sleave.Thanks for the pic,I like the exhaust manifold,s also,almost cast headers.................YG
     
  7. terrarodder
    Joined: Sep 9, 2005
    Posts: 1,101

    terrarodder
    Member
    from EASTERN PA

    Years back when these engines first came out I think it was Hot Rod Mag.,did an article on souping one of these up.Weight was a big factor though and they said how much weight you could save by just lossing the cast exaust and intake manifolds.
     
  8. Machinos
    Joined: Dec 30, 2002
    Posts: 761

    Machinos
    Member

    Man, 1200 pounds is definitely diesel engine territory. I bet it'd last longer too with such low compression... of course, it'd get half a mile per gallon.
     
  9. Holy large hunk of iron Batman thats heavy ,probably would bend a rod in two.Rob
     
  10. mart3406
    Joined: May 31, 2009
    Posts: 3,055

    mart3406
    Member
    from Canada

    --------------------

    I'm not trying to say that the engine is any sort of a light weight (it's not) or that it would be easy, cheap or practical to use one because it wouldn't be. But that quoted 1215 lb weight is fully dressed with all accessories. You could probably lose a 100 lbs. of that by getting rid of the air compressor. Then dump the huge big truck-style iron-bodied generator and replace it with a normal late model automotive alternator . Ditto for the starter and the 60 or 70 llb. cast iron 'big truc'k flywheel clutch assembly. Then replace the bolted-on cast iron SAE-type flywheel housing with an aluminum adapter plate and a normal automotive-type bell and you probably dump another 150 iibs. Knock another 40 or 50 lbs off by getting rid of the huge cast iron intake manifold and adapting or fabricating an aluminum one Next fabricate an aluminum front cover to replace the stock cast iron piece and add an aluminum water pump and you'd be starting to get somewhere! It'd still be a big , heavy lump of iron for sure, bit certainly no worse - and probably somewhat better than a Packard straight-8 which weighed in at around a 1000 lbs or so and were (and are) occasionally used in rods!. I'll bet with a some work, money and fabrication skills, someone could get one of these bad-boy Reo V8s down to about 750 ils (or a fair bit less even) which would be about the same weight as a stock early hemi and a just bit more than a stock iron big-block Ford or Chevy V8. I don't know how well the heads flow, (the intake manifold runners look pretty big) but the bottom end would be probably nearly indestructible and a good candidate for turbo-charging maybe. (Hmm?? How 'bout a turbo-charged 440 Reo, on alky maybe with a bit of nitro in the tank too, running in a 'liner at Bonneville, where engine weight is not such a big deal??<grin>) Those replaceable wet sleeves could a nice touch at rebuild or at overhaul time in the pits too! </grin></grin>
     
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2010
  11. RichFox
    Joined: Dec 3, 2006
    Posts: 10,020

    RichFox
    Member Emeritus

    I remember the (I think) R&C artical about the REO. That is allmost exactally what they were proposing. When I was a MoPool mechanic we had a number of Reo and Studebaker 2 1/2 ton trucks with the REO 331 OHV 6 cylinder engine. It was a lot bigger that the GMC 302 which was in the other 2 1/2 ton trucks but very cool with the drop in sleeves and all. And the six came in sizes over 400 inches in the same block. Maybe a very cool XX engine for Bonneville.
     
  12. kwoodyh
    Joined: Apr 11, 2006
    Posts: 641

    kwoodyh
    Member

    What a stump pulling behemoth! How cool would it be to have a REO powered Rod? Kick the compression or add a roots style huffer and look out! ;) (How ironic my 440th post would be about a 440 REO!)
     
    Last edited: Mar 14, 2010
  13. RichFox
    Joined: Dec 3, 2006
    Posts: 10,020

    RichFox
    Member Emeritus

    If you want to step up from there look to the Roline 805 V8 engine used in the ten ton trucks at the tume. Pretty soon you start getting into 1100 inch Ford tank motors. Big but aluminum. The guy who put one in the Mustang was building a freak. But AA/GL class at the salt is for 500 inch plus single engine open wheel cars on gas. So a rear engine digger looking car with an 1100 inch twin cam four valve V8 shouldn't be all bad. At least that was my thought when I dragged this thing home. Guess we will never know.
     

    Attached Files:

  14. Piper106
    Joined: Jul 29, 2006
    Posts: 126

    Piper106
    Member

    Slap a 6-71 or a 8-71 blower on that baby.

    Take advantage of all that beef and the low compression.

    I'd keep the revs low, because like some other truck engines, the rev potential might be limited by the ability of the oiling system to keep up.

    Piper106
     
  15. Machinos
    Joined: Dec 30, 2002
    Posts: 761

    Machinos
    Member

    I bet someone's done something to one of those enormous Mack gas engines...
     
  16. mart3406
    Joined: May 31, 2009
    Posts: 3,055

    mart3406
    Member
    from Canada

    ------------------------------
    I'd love to see that R&C magazine article!
    (someone on another post in this thread
    thinks the article *may* have been in Hot
    Rod magazine as well) Does anyone know
    what issue to look for - or even better,
    have a copy of thie article they could
    scan and post here!!???

    One thing I noticed when I posted the pics
    of the cutaway drawings, was the cylinder
    heads The port layout and particularly the
    angle they run at relative to the valves look
    pretty good. (at least in the somewhat
    limited view shown in cutaway drawings!)
    When designing a V8 engine for a passenger
    car, the engineers usually have to compromise
    quite a bit on the port angles - particularly on
    the exhaust side, in order order to have
    manifolds that can clear the frame,
    fenderwells, steering box and other
    obstructions in the limited space available
    under the hood and between the frame rails
    of a passenger car. Since the Reo V8 was
    designed right from the start as heavy-duty
    class 8 truck engine, the engineers didn't
    face these usual restrictions and in the
    drawings anyway, the exhaust ports seem
    to come out at a very good angle relative
    to the valve and actually appear to curve
    up slightly, in line with the natural direction
    of flow, rather than having to curve. twist
    and convulate downward in opposition to
    the direction of natural of flow, as would
    be the case in a normal passenger car
    engine. Without actually seeing an actual
    head up close, (or better yet, putting one
    on a flow bench!) it's hard to say how well
    the heads actually flow, or could be made
    to flow, but it looks like there is some
    definite power making potential there. For
    a Bonneville or similar 'land speed' type
    racer where the weight of the engine
    wouldn't be a great handicap - and
    particularly if run i in one of the 'vintage'
    or 'obsolete engine' classes, a 440 Reo
    might actually pretty competitive! And
    as far a being "cool" and outrageously
    "dare to be different", there'd be no
    "maybe" about it!!! :)

    Mart3406
    =============================
     
  17. mart3406
    Joined: May 31, 2009
    Posts: 3,055

    mart3406
    Member
    from Canada

    --------------------------
    I don't know this for fact, but being a
    heavy-duty, class 8 truck engine, intended
    to run for hundreds of thousands of miles
    between overhauls, (and with most of
    those miles running at near WOT and under
    maximum load for hours at a time, I
    suspect the stock or nearly stock) oiling
    system might actually be well suited and
    even have some slight, built-in 'overkill' for
    a blown or turbo'd and/or alky or nitro
    burning Bonneville racer!

    Regarding the general bottom end strength
    too - I remember reading in one of the
    trucking magazines around that time that
    just as Reo was closing their doors in 1975,
    their engineers were actually working on a
    320-plus hp turbo version of the engine.
    for use in military vehicles and as an
    in-house, lower-cost 'diesel-alternative' for
    civilian class 8 Reo trucks too . If true, that
    really says something about the engine's
    inherent toughness and particularly the
    integrity of the bottom end and oiling
    system! 320 hp, particularly from a
    turbocharged 440-inch V8 doesn't sound
    like anything at all , but getting that from
    a gasoline burning engine that also had to
    live, work and hold together in a class 8
    trucking environment was (and is!) an
    unheard of accomplishment.

    Mart3406
    =======================
     
    Last edited: Mar 14, 2010
  18. RichFox
    Joined: Dec 3, 2006
    Posts: 10,020

    RichFox
    Member Emeritus

    There is no Vintage or obsolote engine cdlass that the Reo V8 would fit into.
     
  19. I was thinking about a 440 reo engine I saw near home here in oz at a show so I googled it up and bugger me I,m back on the HAMB looking at the same engine I saw posted by a guy in canada,the power of the internet........
     
  20. mart3406
    Joined: May 31, 2009
    Posts: 3,055

    mart3406
    Member
    from Canada

    -----------------------
    Some Reo '440 gas engine' powered trucks
    were imported to OZ?? Wow! Cool! Ya' learn
    something new every day! :)

    Mart3406
    =============================
     
  21. m.ralph
    Joined: Nov 6, 2009
    Posts: 540

    m.ralph
    Member

    Thanks for all the responds from everyone about the Reo. Ralph
     
  22. John T Conover
    Joined: Nov 9, 2010
    Posts: 92

    John T Conover
    Member
    from US

    R&C Oct '55
     

    Attached Files:

  23. Dynaflash_8
    Joined: Sep 24, 2008
    Posts: 3,037

    Dynaflash_8
    Member
    from Auburn WA

    has the same firing order as a flathead ford
     
  24. OahuEli
    Joined: Dec 27, 2008
    Posts: 5,243

    OahuEli
    Member
    from Hawaii

    I recently saw one of these in an old Onan generator that had been retired not too long ago, thought it was an IHC, but the valve covers look exactly like this. Motor had about 400 hours on it and the guy said it still ran like a top. What a brute!
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.