Register now to get rid of these ads!

Projects *Tech Week* twin plug

Discussion in 'Traditional Hot Rods' started by nutrocker, Feb 5, 2014.

  1. I'm with Dean, well done!!!
     
  2. Bump for some great tech
     
    BJR likes this.
  3. BJR
    Joined: Mar 11, 2005
    Posts: 9,914

    BJR
    Member

    From long ago.
     
  4. Tired of the "show us your........" threads
     
    Outback, HotRodWorks, Blues4U and 4 others like this.
  5. we need a tech week.
     
    nunattax, Blues4U and Happydaze like this.
  6. Yup, that is what I was thinking. @Ryan , tech week time? Been a while
     
    BJR likes this.
  7. grumpy65
    Joined: Dec 19, 2017
    Posts: 920

    grumpy65

    I vote ' YES'.
     
  8. PINEAPPLE
    Joined: Aug 26, 2012
    Posts: 428

    PINEAPPLE
    Member

    bump for tech week voting
     
    kidcampbell71 likes this.
  9. Look at the date on the original thread
     
    303racer and BJR like this.
  10. PINEAPPLE
    Joined: Aug 26, 2012
    Posts: 428

    PINEAPPLE
    Member

    I know. I commented when it was fresh. I was suggesting a vote to get tech week going..
     
    kidcampbell71 and Tman like this.
  11. atch
    Joined: Sep 3, 2002
    Posts: 5,640

    atch
    Member

    tman,

    Thanx for bringing this back up. I remember it from when it was new but reread the whole thing this morning. Insanely interesting tech. I wish I had half as much talent in my whole body as some folks on here have in their pinkie finger.
     
  12. Damn Trent, I forgot about this one thanks for reminding me of it a great piece of tech........
     
    Tman and kidcampbell71 like this.
  13. drtrcrV-8
    Joined: Jan 6, 2013
    Posts: 1,709

    drtrcrV-8
    Member

  14. 303racer
    Joined: Aug 23, 2006
    Posts: 563

    303racer
    Member

    Way back, when things were simpler
     
    Tman and kidcampbell71 like this.
  15. Wonder if it ever made it to the dyno ?
     
    loudbang likes this.
  16. nutrocker
    Joined: Jan 12, 2007
    Posts: 413

    nutrocker
    Member

    Yes, I ran it in the rolling road. From what I can remember it made good hp.
    The motor was a stock 255ci fitted with the twin plug heads, 270f cam with .395” lift, triple 1-3/4” SU carbs, stepped exhaust and electronic ignition with programmable advance curve. From memory it made 147 hp at the flywheel. I will see if I can find the printouts later.
     
    belair, loudbang, Tman and 1 other person like this.
  17. Thats great.
    Wondering what the change from stock was. ?
     
    loudbang likes this.
  18. nutrocker
    Joined: Jan 12, 2007
    Posts: 413

    nutrocker
    Member

    .

    with the motor as above except for the cam and heads was 113hp. So cam and heads added 34 hp. How much was cam and how much was heads I don’t know. But for a stock 255 with just some bolt on go faster bits it wasn’t too bad.
     
  19. So many great tech threads that get buried deep in the archives that should be revived.
     
  20. 7BA9DDA5-0928-4692-BA72-2387776B3B95.jpeg Gr8 planning and even gr8er if not spectacular MACHINE workmanship,BUT, correct if I am wrong; the main or sole purpose for having dual plugs is to “fire” or “ignite” any and all remaining fuel that was left over or did NOT get totally burned by the first plug!! Right or Wrong?? Looks like a lot of work and prep that will make little difference in the outcome of the cool flathead. I am not trying to bash your beautiful machine work, just wondering what effect(if any) dual plugs on a Flatmotor will show??
     
    juan motime and kidcampbell71 like this.
  21. THE FRENCHTOWN FLYER
    Joined: Jun 6, 2007
    Posts: 5,418

    THE FRENCHTOWN FLYER
    Member
    from FRENCHTOWN

    Pete, I just discovered this thread. Great work, truly innovative. To comment on Flatheadjohn47's question there is more to it than just two sources of ignition to complete combustion. Twin sparks allow one to increase the burn rate of the charge, to reduce total ignition lead, and thus reduce the "negative work" done by having to ignite the charge against a rising piston.
    I do like the fact that with two separate distributors there is the opportunity to stagger the timing. Perhaps one needs more advance than the other? Have you tinkered with varying the timing between the two Pete?
     
    loudbang, fauj and Tman like this.
  22. Pete, thanks for answering my question concerning the dual spark plugs on the cool flathead.
     
    fauj likes this.
  23. nutrocker
    Joined: Jan 12, 2007
    Posts: 413

    nutrocker
    Member

    I did say right at the beginning of this thread that the usual costs involved far outweigh any gains, and it’s for that reason I did my own, well that and I don’t have the money anyway.
    What the twin plugs did do though is smooth out a very lumpy idle.
     
  24. belair
    Joined: Jul 10, 2006
    Posts: 9,015

    belair
    Member

    Great thread, thanks for answering all the questions we have. Awesome work.
     
  25. The satisfaction here is in the doing, I believe, not in the performance gains, however nice that becomes. And knowing the modifications have worked to improve things is nice as well.
    But enjoying the journey for some is far more important, at least when you have the time.
     
    nutrocker likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.