Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Steering Arm Issues

Discussion in 'Traditional Hot Rods' started by 66Coronet440, Feb 13, 2023.

  1. 66Coronet440
    Joined: Oct 26, 2009
    Posts: 422

    66Coronet440
    Member

    So I mounted up my Model A split bones, and the right steering arm is hitting at the draglink knuckle. I am trying to run the steering shaft above the bones. These are pricey Pete & Jake's hairpin arms; they were the only thing I could get to work with the Speedway spindles. Should I heat up and bend? If pics will help, I'll get some up later.
     
  2. Fordors
    Joined: Sep 22, 2016
    Posts: 5,142

    Fordors
    Member

    Post photos, that will help for sure.
     
  3. alchemy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 19,999

    alchemy
    Member

    You say hairpin arms. Usually hairpins are the replacement for wishbones. Or do you mean the steering arms are a hairpin shape?

    Either way, you might need to bend the arms a bit to get your clearance. Make sure the arms are forged, not cast. If forged, heat til a dull red, bend, then let cool very slowly. Don't get them bright red, and don't hurry the cooling in any way with water or air.
     
    theHIGHLANDER and SS327 like this.
  4. 66Coronet440
    Joined: Oct 26, 2009
    Posts: 422

    66Coronet440
    Member

    They're designed to be used with hairpins. I had knuckle clearance problems with a pair of hoop-style arms, and these alleviated that. I believe these are the same as the old CE arms.
     

  5. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 33,381

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Good photos of the issue get good answers that you can actually use. You probably will only get wild ass guesses without them.

    One thing, does your axle have the same drop as what the steering arms are designed to work with? On a lot of their front end pieces everything is designed to work with specific parts they sell or in this case an axle with the same exact amount of total drop.
     
  6. alchemy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 19,999

    alchemy
    Member

    That's not an exact science either though. If they were even made for a specific axle, there are at least four different heights of wishbone it would have to clear. An A wishbone is different from a 32-34, which is different from a 35-41, which is different from a post war. They all have different amount of droop behind the yoke. Too many combos.
     
  7. 66Coronet440
    Joined: Oct 26, 2009
    Posts: 422

    66Coronet440
    Member

    20230213_215247.jpg 20230213_215224.jpg

    So this is what I have going. As far as I can tell, the wishbones were set up for the 3" drop axle. My chassis is 2x4 box tubing. As I don't have the body or power train mounted, I'm considering going to an original A chassis.
     
  8. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 23,091

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Those are just the wrong arms.

    You need ones with a deeper drop.
     
    dirt t likes this.
  9. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 23,091

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    This is how you get where you need to be:
    [​IMG]
     
  10. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 23,091

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Last edited: Feb 14, 2023
    Clydesdale and mgtstumpy like this.
  11. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 23,091

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I suspect what happened to here is a nomenclature issue.

    You have split wishbones on a dropped axle.

    The steering arms that you have are for hairpins, or 4-bar front suspension. In each of those cases the tie rod and drag link pass between the upper and lower bars, exactly where your split wishbones are.

    Some vendors mistakenly call hairpins wishbones. I don't know why.

    Hairpins:
    [​IMG]
    Note where the tie rod goes.

    4-bar:
    [​IMG]
    Note again where the tie rod goes.

    Split wishbone:
    [​IMG]

    Note once again where the tie rod goes.

    The only way you can run your setup is deeper drop steering arms, or dropped tie rod ends, as shown above.
     
  12. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 33,381

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Gimpy nailed it as he usually does.
    A side shot would have been nice though.

    Side note that little box that says full image helps us old farts see what is in the photo a lot easier. round back with bones.jpg Round back with bones 2.jpg Screenshot (1099).jpg
     
  13. Happydaze
    Joined: Aug 21, 2009
    Posts: 1,747

    Happydaze
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    OP did say he was trying to run the tie rod above the bones though. No mention as to why that is so, but it is doable but always seems to be a rabbit hole of problems.

    Chris
     
  14. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 33,381

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    He said right in his first post that they were Pete and Jakes hairpin arms. Not the deeper dropped arms that he needs. As Gimpyshotrods told him he just bought the wrong arms.

    Also that mostlikely means that the swap meet arms I bought for my SoCal axle and bones aren't going to work.
     
    gimpyshotrods likes this.
  15. Bit hard to tell, but it also looks like a late axle that's been dropped, which allows less swingin' room.
    By late I mean after '36.
     
    Tman likes this.
  16. 66Coronet440
    Joined: Oct 26, 2009
    Posts: 422

    66Coronet440
    Member

    I'm not planning to use them, but I have some hairpins and batwings kicking around. When I mocked them up, it appeared those arms would hit. Thank you for all the suggestions. I will give those Speedway arms a shot. It actually looked like running the steering overhead would give me the least resistance with (what I think is) the Vega box I'm using.

    Thanks for all the replies. I'm not sure on that axle. I had to have it straightened a bit at a shop, and the guy thought it was 70's era aftermarket.
     
  17. Johnny Gee
    Joined: Dec 3, 2009
    Posts: 12,222

    Johnny Gee
    Member
    from Downey, Ca

  18. alchemy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 19,999

    alchemy
    Member

    Pretty sure the arms you have are forged and you can bend them.
     
    dirt t, irishsteve and mustangsix like this.
  19. 31Apickup
    Joined: Nov 8, 2005
    Posts: 3,322

    31Apickup
    Member

    I’ve heated and bent a pair of those before.
     
  20. 66Coronet440
    Joined: Oct 26, 2009
    Posts: 422

    66Coronet440
    Member

    They appear to be forged so I doubt it's a problem. I just hate to do it.
     
  21. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 23,091

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I have now seen two instances of cars with obvious bends in the tie rod from where the frame hit it.

    I do not recommend putting the tie rod between two rigid things.

    While it is not all that likely that the frame will smash it, if the tie rod is above and it does, it will result in a substantial toe-out situation.

    The results of that are potentially dangerous, especially if you are moving fast, or are in a corner, or both.
     
    X-cpe and Moriarity like this.
  22. alchemy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 19,999

    alchemy
    Member

    That guy was wrong. It’s an original Ford axle that has been dropped. I’d guess a 33-36 or a 37-40. If you take a clear pic from the front we can see better. Maybe you can measure the axle thickness at the perch, as those years were different. The 33-36 was 2” tall and the 37-40 was 2.25” tall.
     
  23. Illustrious Hector
    Joined: Jun 15, 2020
    Posts: 410

    Illustrious Hector
    Member

    Get the arms that are bolt through, as in gimpy's post #10 I had the blind hole style originally and they kept coming loose.
     
    Kevin Ardinger and X38 like this.
  24. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 23,091

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

  25. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 33,381

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Johnny Gee likes this.
  26. 66Coronet440
    Joined: Oct 26, 2009
    Posts: 422

    66Coronet440
    Member

    Not home right now, but I'm also sure the perches are 2.25".
     
  27. 66Coronet440
    Joined: Oct 26, 2009
    Posts: 422

    66Coronet440
    Member

    Yeah, I wouldn't trust the blind arms. If I can't see the bolt, I won't install it.
     
  28. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 23,091

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    To confuse matters more, 1928 to 1932 also had 2.25" perch bosses.

    Why they took a brief break from that size, I guess we'll never know.
     
  29. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 23,091

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Spring perch boss distance may nail down the year:

    1928-1936 is 36-1/2", but 1932-1936 are knocked out because they have a 2" perch boss, just 1928-1931.
    1937-1941 is 38-1/2".
    1942-1945 Ford was too busy with the war effort to make axles.
    1946-1948 is 41"
     
  30. 66Coronet440
    Joined: Oct 26, 2009
    Posts: 422

    66Coronet440
    Member

    38.5". I should have remembered since I had to get a 33.5" spring.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.