Register now to get rid of these ads!

small cubic inch smallblock recipes?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Stone, Oct 16, 2008.

  1. Stone
    Joined: Nov 24, 2003
    Posts: 2,279

    Stone
    Member

    I saw the post in the thread about the scaled down model V8. It referenced a guy with a very small cubic inch SBC.

    I know that these mills aren't practical and are only used (majority of the time) for class rules in a race series. But I like to read about tech topics and hear the stories. The threads on here about the 302ci sbc are classics.

    So does anyone have any expierence racing in a class or know of someone that built a tiny monster for whatever reason. What's the smallest small block recipe you can think of?

    Thanks guys.
     
  2. beernut
    Joined: Feb 9, 2008
    Posts: 139

    beernut
    Member
    from solvang

    my '55 is powered by a 283 punched out .060, makes it a 292 now, with 12-1,old f.i. heads,aluminum flywheel.just for fun and old time sake
     
  3. Da Tinman
    Joined: Dec 29, 2005
    Posts: 4,222

    Da Tinman
    Member

    With the proper crank and block it is possible to make a 231 ci sbc, used to be a popular motor in the complicated eliminator classes.
     
  4. skunx1964
    Joined: Aug 21, 2008
    Posts: 1,455

    skunx1964
    Member

    i like the small inch, high revvers too. perfect for a lil coupe or roadster, in my opinion.
     

  5. Lobucrod
    Joined: Mar 22, 2006
    Posts: 4,122

    Lobucrod
    Alliance Vendor
    from Texas

    I'm building a 302, 283 crank in a early 327 block with double hump heads and a cast iron 4bbl 'H' intake to put in my 65 mid injun vair. Want a high winding screamer with no torque. Hopefully i can keep the diff from grenading.
     
  6. Stone
    Joined: Nov 24, 2003
    Posts: 2,279

    Stone
    Member

    302 sounds sweet.

    Any info on the 231? What crank and block were used?

    And are Chevys the only small cubic inch revers people built? I have read alot about high revving 302 chevies and small cubic inch "fun" power plants. But not really about any other brand. I know that the factory chevy 302 came about for class rules in trans-am racing. And Ford and others were in that class slugging it out. But the Chevy is the only motor I hear people talk about reproducing.
     
    upfberg likes this.
  7. gas pumper
    Joined: Aug 13, 2007
    Posts: 2,957

    gas pumper
    Member

    Smokey Y built a small Chevy for Indy car racing.

    209 CI, turbo, 1000+ HP
     
    Last edited: Oct 17, 2008
    jimmy six likes this.
  8. Shaggy
    Joined: Mar 6, 2003
    Posts: 5,207

    Shaggy
    Member
    from Sultan, WA

    Me 2 only going a 350 block and spacer bearings for a stronger bottom end

    The M/T indy car ran a 306 i'm assuming a .030 over 301
     
  9. Shaggy
    Joined: Mar 6, 2003
    Posts: 5,207

    Shaggy
    Member
    from Sultan, WA


    Ford already had a 302 4" bore 3" stroke, but because Nobody ever built a Limp 2bbl chev 302 and ford did the chev is a legend and the ford isnt....and also because chevy's are better than fords


    Something else to consider most fat old street rod guys never take their car above 4000 rpm under load right about where you start running out of juice with a long stroke 383 but also where a 301 picks up. So your average old street rodder will think a long stroke motor is the way to go when really preformance wise a short stroke motor can be a better hot rod motor in the right hands
     
  10. Von Hartmann
    Joined: Nov 21, 2006
    Posts: 988

    Von Hartmann
    Member

    Put a 283 crank in a 327 block with a solid cam and balance it. You got a 9000 rpm motor. they're good because they have the same bore as a 350 with the stroke of a 283. I believe it has to do with the larger surface on the top of the piston relative to the short quick stroke and low rotating mass. They're near indistructable but have little torque. Just gotta rev the shit outa them and dump the clutch....and find the weak link.
     
  11. bbtom30
    Joined: Jan 10, 2007
    Posts: 155

    bbtom30
    Member
    from so. cal

    When I.H.R.A. had no minimum weight,Grumpy Bill Jenkins built very light Vega's with very small motors and went very fast.The grump was beating Sox & Martin's hemi's with 260 c.i.
     
  12. Phil1934
    Joined: Jun 24, 2001
    Posts: 2,716

    Phil1934
    Member

    267 had a 3.5" bore. Add a 3" stroke crank.
     
    Last edited: Oct 17, 2008
  13. Duration
    Joined: Oct 2, 2006
    Posts: 543

    Duration
    Member
    from Wayne, MI

    fathack told me how to build a 250 chevy v8 out of stock parts. i forgot what they were but it was cheap 70's junk i think.
     
  14. Shaggy
    Joined: Mar 6, 2003
    Posts: 5,207

    Shaggy
    Member
    from Sultan, WA

    BIG VALVES fit on the top of the piston is the biggie i belive and the short stroke revability
     
  15. Stone
    Joined: Nov 24, 2003
    Posts: 2,279

    Stone
    Member

    I love this stuff. I think I just hate the idea of going with the crowd.
     
  16. David Chandler
    Joined: Jan 27, 2007
    Posts: 1,101

    David Chandler
    Member

    Small block Ford's started out as a 221 cid, in 62 and maybe 63.
     
  17. Da Tinman
    Joined: Dec 29, 2005
    Posts: 4,222

    Da Tinman
    Member


    Yup thats it,, I dont remember all the specifics, just the number.

    I do remember that it can be done using off the shelf components, rods pistons and such.

    Someone chase the Squirrel in here, he probably knows!
     
  18. Stone
    Joined: Nov 24, 2003
    Posts: 2,279

    Stone
    Member

    Yea he like a sbc guru. I have learned alot from his posts
     
    Deuces likes this.

  19. Theoretically- that is your best bet for performance out of a small/small block. A 300 c.i. or smaller "stroker" would just be a waste of time. The higher revs call for a long duration cam and a compression ratio to match. Do some research on static compression ratio with regards to cam duration-- If you are good to 7000 rpm plus you can run a long duration cam with 11 or 12:1 on pump gas--- and scream!!
     
  20. gnichols
    Joined: Mar 6, 2008
    Posts: 11,354

    gnichols
    Member
    from Tampa, FL

    Is the 283 crank in a 327 block basically the Z-28 motor from the first hot rod Camaros? Gary
     
    Deuces likes this.
  21. Pir8Darryl
    Joined: Jan 9, 2008
    Posts: 2,487

    Pir8Darryl
    Member

    No, a 283 crank in a 327 block is a 301 cid sbc.

    A Z-28 302 is a forged large journal 3 inch stroke crank [yea, 283] in a 4 bolt main 4 inch bore block [327, 350]. Then you need the good rods, the good heads, the big carb, etc... THAT'S a Z-28 [clone] motor.

    I'm not trying to be an ass or anything... Just pointing out that there's a difference between arriving at a particular CID with a combination of random parts, and actually cloning a legendary engine.
     
  22. Someone was telling me ages ago about a Pontiac small cubic inch formula. Seems like you got about 300 CI - used a '56 block with a later top end, but I'm not sure what crank. But it was all stuff that was pretty cheap to come by, just needed to be machined up.
     
  23. Roupe
    Joined: Feb 11, 2006
    Posts: 723

    Roupe
    Member

    The smallest factory sbc was the 262ci made in 1975-76. Bore and stroke was 3.671 X 3.100. Next was the 265ci, 1955-56 with a bore and stroke of 3.750 X 3.000. The 262 was rated at 135HP (I think) and made at the height of the low HP, shit smog motor era.
     
  24. Guess you have never driven a HO 5.0L mustang. Those things haul ass with 302 cubes. Smoked a TON of camaros over the years. Try getting a 305 camaro to do the same out of the box, yeah right! Not to mention that camaros were piles of junk until the last generation, which are still crappy built cars with plenty of problems...but the later GM motors are very fast.....but then ford went to a 4.6L and it keeps up just fine with GM's 5.7.
    I have driven a lot of cars over the years, some better than others, each is different and each serves it's own purpose.
     
  25. Roupe
    Joined: Feb 11, 2006
    Posts: 723

    Roupe
    Member

    Speed Gems likes this.
  26. Bob W
    Joined: Sep 14, 2008
    Posts: 687

    Bob W
    Member
    from Here

    In 1967 a Z-28 optioned Camaro had 2 bolt mains and a small journal crank. A 327 block with a 283 crank. In 68 they went to large journals.

    Bob
     
    Deuces likes this.
  27. Bob W
    Joined: Sep 14, 2008
    Posts: 687

    Bob W
    Member
    from Here

    Once apon a time I read Chevy had 302s back in 1957. During the Black Widow days they bore some 283s out to 4 inch for the roundy round guys.

    Bob
     
  28. R Pope
    Joined: Jan 23, 2006
    Posts: 3,309

    R Pope
    Member

    In 1968 I built a 288 SBC, fuelie heads and cam, 10:! comp. and AFB carb for my '54 Bel Aire. 3-speed stick and 4.11 posi. Lots of fun for a little while! RPM like crazy!
     
    Deuces likes this.
  29. Not2low
    Joined: Sep 5, 2007
    Posts: 83

    Not2low
    Member
    from Eaton,Ohio

    Try to find some NHRA modified production class cars.They have some very small cubic inch motors that turn crazy RPMS.I think most of them were in E and F class.You will have to have very high compression and gobs of camshaft to get the RPMS they spin to make big horsepower.I know of a local E/MP that turns 11,000 RPMS in a 62 Vette.Big money destroked short block,but what a sweet sweet sound.
     
    Deuces likes this.
  30. Bob W
    Joined: Sep 14, 2008
    Posts: 687

    Bob W
    Member
    from Here

    My favorites, Modified Eliminator. :)

    The guy's at NHRA should have been shot for replacing Modified with Super Gas.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    If my arm was twisted, I could be talked into a BB car like this one.

    [​IMG]
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.