Register now to get rid of these ads!

Projects rear suspension choice for 27 T/ 31 A frame

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by morecowbell, Aug 10, 2018.

  1. morecowbell
    Joined: Mar 31, 2014
    Posts: 56

    morecowbell
    Member
    from colorado

    well i picked up yet another project from a local hot rod guy who had assembled lots of bits and pieces.
    27 T body
    31 A frame
    46 in Model A rear spring
    ford 8 in rear
    35/36 radius rods
    split wishbones for front
    original A gas tank
    beautiful 50s Chrysler wheels and nice tires
    70s chevy 350 from a Monte Carlo
    TH350 trans

    as i start to read the the Tardel book and the threads on here I had a question:

    for the rear suspension I guess I have 2 options? I can use the A spring and set the mounting plates on the 8in to 49.5 inches wide (is this correct),

    or i've seen some people use the front spring (mine measures 31.5 wide and has 7 or 8 leafs) on the rear.

    this is a T body on an A frame. I am looking for a turtle deck for it as I want that style. May I ask what you all recommend for the rear suspension choice for this setup: the taller rear spring or the front spring used on the back (I have a 1in lowered spring on the front now above the axle).

    Thank you.
     
  2. chopndrop
    Joined: Feb 8, 2005
    Posts: 715

    chopndrop
    Member

    I don't think many people use Model A front springs on the rear. Later front springs are more common, 35-41. They are longer. But that's not the only consideration. With a stock A frame, the spring sits on top of the rear end. If you are wanting to use a front spring in the back, which is going to be much flatter, the spring is mounted behind the rear end. This will require the frame to be extended as the stock frame ends at the rear end. However, the 35/36 rear radius rods you have have spring mounts that will place the spring behind the rear. So, up to you, you have options.
    1-A rear spring over rear, stock frame. Can use 35/36 rods but you wont need their integrated spring mount.
    2-35-41 Front spring, extend frame, use 35/36 rear rods with their spring mounts.
    3-Combo of those above. A rear spring, extend frame, use 35/36 rear rods with mounts. This gets ride height lower than option 1
     
    Last edited: Aug 10, 2018
  3. fiftyv8
    Joined: Mar 11, 2007
    Posts: 5,394

    fiftyv8
    Member
    from CO & WA

    You could just leave the model A spring where it sits in the frame and move your axle forward to have the spring behind the axle, but you do have two other things to consider.
    • Suspension travel since the car will sit lower and the axle tube on occasions may hit the under side of the chassis
    • Secondly, the A style spring tends to take up a lot of space in a trunk area and lose a potential flattish floor.
    Consider a flatter transverse spring, coil overs are pretty simple and if you want to go fancy look at a Jag diff.
    If you are considering decent HP be sure that your 35 radius rods are capable of doing the job...
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.