Register now to get rid of these ads!

Radial vs. Bias Ply? Help.

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by jrolla2k3, Feb 24, 2008.

  1. jrolla2k3
    Joined: Jan 10, 2008
    Posts: 146

    jrolla2k3
    Member

    Hey everyone,


    Ive searched, but cant seem to find a good post about the advantages or disadvantages of radials vs bias plys. I also want to know what size tires you guys with 53-54 210's are running on your "stock" 15" wheels with possibly some pics to show the stance with lowered suspension.

    Thanks
    Jaison
     
  2. Malcolm
    Joined: Feb 9, 2006
    Posts: 8,036

    Malcolm
    Member
    from Nebraska

  3. Lazer5000
    Joined: Dec 7, 2007
    Posts: 729

    Lazer5000
    Member

    Bias look better, radials drive better.
     
  4. speedtool
    Joined: Oct 15, 2005
    Posts: 2,540

    speedtool
    BANNED

    No matter what the purists say.
     

  5. BOBBY FORD
    Joined: Oct 6, 2007
    Posts: 700

    BOBBY FORD
    Member

    Couldn't have said it better. Thanks, BOBBY FORD:D
     
  6. jrolla2k3
    Joined: Jan 10, 2008
    Posts: 146

    jrolla2k3
    Member

    DOH!

    Guess I shoulda "searched" on page 1. Anyone have any pics and sizes so I can have a visual?


    Im a bonehead...:rolleyes:

    Jaison
     
  7. Mark in Japan
    Joined: Jun 19, 2007
    Posts: 1,466

    Mark in Japan
    Member

    Yes....but you're doin it with a lot of style ! ;)
    I've ONLY used radials...I guess I'm just not old enough....thank god !
     
  8. Zombie Hot Rod
    Joined: Oct 22, 2006
    Posts: 2,452

    Zombie Hot Rod
    Member
    from New York

    Like anything else you get used to the bias plys. I don't think they handle as bad as most people make them out to, and I drive around NYC on these things!
     
  9. HHRdave
    Joined: Jul 31, 2006
    Posts: 1,068

    HHRdave
    BANNED
    from So Cal

    If you get the air pressure just right, the bias plys work fine
     
  10. Stizzealth
    Joined: Feb 2, 2008
    Posts: 179

    Stizzealth
    Member

    Is it true that switching to radials on a car designed for bias plies can very much reduce comfortable cruising speed?
     
  11. floored
    Joined: Apr 11, 2007
    Posts: 470

    floored
    Member

    Could be just me, but i think alot of the effect is lost on a full fendered or full bodied car.
     
  12. NITROFC
    Joined: Apr 17, 2001
    Posts: 6,175

    NITROFC
    BANNED


    True ...When I had bias on car I would not drive over 60 on the roads in the NE now with radials I have no issues going 85 plus

    But what WTF do I know .............
     

  13. Done that a few times.
    Radials did ride better and handling at "comfortable cruising speed" (which is different for most) wasn't a problem.

    Seems like bias will give you more warning when they go out from under you than a radial will on a hard corner.

    Then again, the radials stick better in the corners.

    The choices are, looks or performance.
     
  14. teddyp
    Joined: May 28, 2006
    Posts: 3,197

    teddyp
    Member

    DITTO for me
     
  15. zzford
    Joined: May 5, 2005
    Posts: 1,823

    zzford
    Member

    If you are going to REALLY drive the car, I wouldn't use anything but radials. If you want garage art, go with the bias plys. I love traditional style cars but am not about to give up better performance and safety for "correctness". Form follows function.
     
  16. Chris Casny
    Joined: Mar 13, 2006
    Posts: 4,874

    Chris Casny
    Member

    I totally disagree,
    bias plys are great if you get the pressure right, like Hagen said, I drive in and around Los Angeles everyday with bias plys and love them, but if you are not used to them, it can be a bit akward at first.
    It's like anything, practice makes perfect.
     
  17. How about some recommended pressures for Bias and Radial?
    Especially interested in what pressures you're running in Bias.

    Along with the style car they're on.

    I run 20# rear and 30# front in the big and little radials on my 32 roadster.
     
  18. loudpedal
    Joined: Mar 23, 2004
    Posts: 2,203

    loudpedal
    Member
    from SLC Utah

    Safety? Please explain.
     
  19. NITROFC
    Joined: Apr 17, 2001
    Posts: 6,175

    NITROFC
    BANNED

    Dreadman has a point .....

    Good Roads ( WestCoast ) = Bias would be fine
    Shitty Roads ( EastCoast ) = Radials to save your life
     
  20. 53sled
    Joined: Jul 5, 2005
    Posts: 5,817

    53sled
    Member
    from KCMO

    205/65r14s. 3-4" lowered
     

    Attached Files:

  21. 53chevy
    Joined: Mar 5, 2001
    Posts: 1,570

    53chevy
    Member

    Your kidding right??? Don't be such a lazy ass and check your tires if you run Bias from time to time. It seems now days people just expect thing to take car of themselves. When you drive an old car, be pro-active and inspect the damn thing once in while.

    Ken

     
  22. HHRdave
    Joined: Jul 31, 2006
    Posts: 1,068

    HHRdave
    BANNED
    from So Cal


    We like to use the old chalk method. Draw a line of chalk accrosss your tire, drive down the road and see how much is still there. If it's all gone, you are too low. If you you see some on the outer ribs, you are too high. It can take some time, but it's worth it.
     
  23. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 33,943

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    If it is a daily driver bias ply tires won't get near the milage under "normal" driving conditions. I worked for Firestone in the early 70's right at the changeover from bias to radials on new cars and I think the Good bias tires at the time were advertised to get about 25 K miles. Four Firestone Deluxe Champion white walls (narrow) for 100 plus mounting and ballancing, that would be a deal now.
     
  24. mustangsix
    Joined: Mar 7, 2005
    Posts: 1,408

    mustangsix
    Member

    My memory ain't always accurate, so bear with me. ;) I remember when radials started to gain on bias plys in the late sixties. There was a lot of marketing focused on the advantages of radials, particularly tire life. It wasn't uncommon for a cheap set of tires to only go 15k, but back then that might have equated to two years of everyday driving. I think we all drove less back then.

    I also remember being amazed when Firestone and Michelin advertised tire warranties in excess of 30k miles. And I also remember Firestone having two lines of tires - bias belted wide ovals and radials. All very confusing for a sixteen year old kid.

    Of course, being a poor kid, all I could afford were recaps anyway, so for $8.95 each I got those at the local recapper. :)

    I had a friend who had a 61 Bel Air. He had money, so he replaced the bias tires with a set of radials and as I recall, it really transformed the car. Less road noise, better ride. Not sure about handling, since the car was such a pig around corners it probably could have had wooden wheels and still pulled the same g-force.

    Anyway, I digress. If you want a period look, it has to be bias. if you want a better ride (or dirve a lot), I would go radials.
     
  25. nexxussian
    Joined: Mar 14, 2007
    Posts: 3,240

    nexxussian
    Member


    So you mark just the tread?
     
  26. Faded Love Garage
    Joined: Mar 30, 2003
    Posts: 967

    Faded Love Garage
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Spring, TX

    My experience is bias plys give a harder ride but definently look better. They may not last as long but are half the price. If you are going for a traditional look radials should be nowhere near your car. I run bias plys all the time, no problems at all.
     
  27. zzford
    Joined: May 5, 2005
    Posts: 1,823

    zzford
    Member

    Meet me on a skidpad or better yet, a hard wet corner at speed. My coupe is a performance vehicle, hence the use of higher performance tires and brakes.
     
  28. happy hoppy
    Joined: Apr 23, 2001
    Posts: 2,327

    happy hoppy
    Member

    I ran both.
    started with radials, loved them. the car stuck to the road and it was like riding on a cloud.
    I got a set of bias in a trade and put them on the car, I LOVE the look. but there is a distinct difference. you FEEL the road with the bias tires and I get a little more wandering on the freeway then with my radials.
    if your suspension is worn ( like mine ) bias magnifies those problems.
    radials will "forgive" some suspension problems and make your ride a little better but its not a fix for a wornout suspension components.

    I dig my radials, but I roll on bias, hey "form PRECEDES function" right?
     
  29. loudpedal
    Joined: Mar 23, 2004
    Posts: 2,203

    loudpedal
    Member
    from SLC Utah

    ...Oh ok. Let me see if I have this correct.

    YOU would out-drive a bias tire. This is what causes you to paint a broad stroke and deem a bias tire 'unsafe'.

    For your information, One can also out-drive a radial tire IF they so choose.

    Therefore... using YOUR logic, radial tires raise the same 'safety' question...

    ...right?

    Give me a break. I used bias ply tires on my DAILY driver for over 3 years. In the rain, snow and sunshine. Believe it or not, I live to tell the tale. Do you know why? Because I'm not stupid. The only thing that makes a bias tire unsafe is YOUR right foot. Everyting has a limit. If you are going to out-drive a bias ply tire, use a radial shut up about 'safety'.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.