Register now to get rid of these ads!

History Question about 1958 Fords.

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by woodbutcher, Jan 22, 2014.

  1. khead47
    Joined: Mar 29, 2010
    Posts: 1,551

    khead47
    Member

    Butt ugly? I like Butts!
     
  2. sunbeam
    Joined: Oct 22, 2010
    Posts: 4,326

    sunbeam
    Member

    Some people didn't like 58s they didn't have the traditional for Ford 1 big round taillight.
     

  3. Ha ha ha. OK, I gotta admit, there are some nice lookin butts out there!:D
     
  4. rockabilly-medic
    Joined: Sep 15, 2005
    Posts: 147

    rockabilly-medic
    Member

    I like mine

    Posted using the Full Custom H.A.M.B. App!
     

    Attached Files:

  5. Both of those and ugly. LOL
     
  6. Yutan Flash
    Joined: Aug 6, 2008
    Posts: 644

    Yutan Flash
    Member
    from Gretna, NE

    It's kind of sad but funny at the same time - Ford actually had service bulletins addressing the rust-out of front fenders around the headlights of '57-'58s as early as 1958!! I just got ahold of a batch of Technical Service Bulletins from 1958-1960 and was surprised to see this - well, maybe not surprised as much as stunned. Planned obsolescence certainly didn't start with the Vega.
     
  7. brad chevy
    Joined: Nov 22, 2009
    Posts: 2,627

    brad chevy
    Member

    All the companies hit a homerun in 57 but struck out with the drastic changes in 58 then in 59 just didn"t show up to the game. There were 2 many good looking 55,56,& 57s around so 58s turned into family cars . I had a 2 door post 58 and it was a slow tank compared to the 57 s.
     
  8. teddyp
    Joined: May 28, 2006
    Posts: 3,197

    teddyp
    Member

    I have this 58 ford for about 25 yrs now got over a 160,000 n the frist y-block great car and fun to drive
     

    Attached Files:

  9. Frankenstein57
    Joined: Jun 16, 2010
    Posts: 75

    Frankenstein57
    Member

    This sounds like a good explanation, but these cars are designed and built in 57, released in the fall of 57. How do you suppose they knew the rancheros and sedan delivery models were busting out 58 tailites? It was all about production, these were built to be utility type vehicles so they kept the 57 rear
     
  10. I don't know how Ford tested the new designs, but I can tell you from experience (I owned a '58 wagon) that those lenses could be knocked off all too easily when loading difficult loads. After busting a few, I learned to pay close attention. And to add insult to injury, the wagon didn't use the same lens as the sedans but had a slightly shorter (lengthwise) version that was hard to find later.
     
  11. mercmike430
    Joined: Mar 15, 2011
    Posts: 60

    mercmike430
    Member

    That was a bad year for Ford. Can you say Edsel?
     
  12. Hnstray
    Joined: Aug 23, 2009
    Posts: 10,740

    Hnstray
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Quincy, IL

    Since you mention the Edsel, which is always associated with "failure", I'll share some insight about that. It really won't change anything, but I think it is an interesting perspective.

    Certainly the Edsel sales numbers, in absolute terms, were not as high as needed to return profit on the investment, and........the styling was controversial to be sure.

    But in relative terms, the Edsel was, arguably, a mild success. To be fair to FOMOCO, what has to be taken into consideration is the automobile market of the time frame, 1958 thru 1960/61. The US suffered a significant economic recession, beginning in '58 and car sales were well below normal. Taking the overall market sales into account, and applying Edsel's market share in the lower-mid to upper-mid price range to the total numbers, Edsel held it's own, it's share of market percentagewise was reasonable. But "it's own" wasn't enough numerically, and it's controversial styling becoming a butt of jokes, it spelled it's demise.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2020 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.