Register now to get rid of these ads!

Hot Rods Period Correct Rear End 1965 & eairlier

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by hotrodjeep, May 20, 2009.

  1. hotrodjeep
    Joined: Feb 3, 2009
    Posts: 867

    hotrodjeep
    Member
    from Tama, Iowa

    Just a quick question.
    I want to build my Model A sedan as though it was built in 1965, I have already
    decided on the front end, brakes, engine, tranny, but what rear end could
    have been swapped in? 9" Ford? Olds? Buick? Lincoln? I don't know enough
    about what years certin rears were first used in production cars.

    I woul'd like to have self adj. juice brakes, and a good source for brake parts
    and what not. I'm looking for what everybody used and what else was
    available in 1965?

    My engine will be a stock inline 6 & three speed.

    Thanks Jeff
     
  2. DE SOTO
    Joined: Jan 20, 2006
    Posts: 3,857

    DE SOTO
    Member

    Everything was available in '65 !!

    9" Ford, 8" Ford, 8 3/4 MoPaR, 10 Bolt Cehvy '55-'64, Olds/Pontiac '57-'64.

    Hell, With a 6 you can run whatever you want cus unless its BUILT your not gonna break it.

    I am Partial to the '57-'64 Olds/Pontiac My self, Next choice would be an 8 3/4 MoPaR, '42-'46 Ford truck open drive Banjo.. Many Early Rears are plenty for what you want.

    What are you running in front ??

    Ford 9 or 8 is on my "LAST RESORT" list as the have Way off set pinion's & i think they just look like Shit in an early application..... Plus EVERYONE is in love with them & i dont follow the Crowd.

    Please look past the latest Trend of useing Shitty Ass New car rears like the 8.8, S-10, Explorer, ETC ...... None of those are Hot Rod Parts in my book
     
  3. landseaandair
    Joined: Feb 23, 2009
    Posts: 4,485

    landseaandair
    Member
    from phoenix

    You couldn't go wrong with a Dana 44, an early round back 9", 50-64 Olds or Pontiac, 55-63 Chevy, 1949-56 ford car or a banjo rear with an open drive conversion.
     
  4. 61TBird
    Joined: Mar 16, 2008
    Posts: 2,640

    61TBird
    Member

    Thunderbirds have a 9".

    The Data plate helps ID what is in the car;

    <table bgcolor="#ffffaa" border="1" cellpadding="5"><tbody><tr valign="top"><td>1961</td><td>1
    3
    6
    A
    H
    F</td><td>3.00
    3.10
    3.00
    3.00 (Equa-Lock type)
    2.91 (Locking)
    3.10 (Equa-Lock type)</td></tr> <tr valign="top"><td>1962-1963</td><td>1
    2
    3
    6
    A
    B
    H
    F</td><td>3.00
    3.10 (M-series only)
    3.10
    3.00
    3.00 (Equa-Lock type)
    3.10 (Equa-Lockw/M-series)
    2.91 (Locking)
    3.10 (Equa-Lock type)</td></tr> <tr valign="top"><td>1964-1966</td><td>1
    3
    4
    6
    A
    D</td><td>3.00
    3.20
    3.25
    2.80
    3.00 (Equa-Lock type)
    3.25 (Equa-Lock type)</td></tr></tbody></table>
     

  5. The37Kid
    Joined: Apr 30, 2004
    Posts: 30,775

    The37Kid
    Member

    Thanks TBird, that will help with my period correct '62 built Roadster.
     
  6. rainh8r
    Joined: Dec 30, 2005
    Posts: 792

    rainh8r
    Member

    Olds/Pontiac rears were the ticket for hot engines, but most guys with street cars ran 55-57 Chev rears because they were easy to get, cheap to buy, and had a good gear selection. Dana 44's from F100's were there too. The 9" and Mopars were all available, they just weren't used as much around here.
     
  7. Even the 12bolt was out in '65. But my vote would be the '55-'57 axle housing, which was by far the most popular at the time, at least on the street. The guys with strip cars or wicked street cars took those out and used Olds or Pontiac. I guess the Ford guys always used 9".
     
  8. hotrodjeep
    Joined: Feb 3, 2009
    Posts: 867

    hotrodjeep
    Member
    from Tama, Iowa

    My Front is standard I beam, 40 Ford spindles, F-100 juice brakes.

    I would also like to stay away from the more common 9" ford. Which of
    the other choices Buick, Olds, Chevy, Truck, would be the closest in
    width to be an approite fit under the A?

    Jeff
     
  9. tommy
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 14,757

    tommy
    Member Emeritus

    In my part of the world the 55-64 Chevy rear was the hot lick in a hot rod for the street. Mostly because it was readily available and lower ratio pumpkins didn't cost a months wages.

    Gasers and heavy duty street racers used the Olds rear. I'm sure the 9" Ford was used by many back then but in my area they were not as popular as they have become.
     
  10. RAY With
    Joined: Mar 15, 2009
    Posts: 3,132

    RAY With
    Member

    Nothing has beat the Ford 9 inch for durability. When properly built they have no problems and unlimited amount of ratios to choose from. Parts never a problem as is complete availibility.
     
  11. dirt
    Joined: Oct 26, 2005
    Posts: 908

    dirt
    Member

    as others have said olds for the strip, chevy for the street. i have a 57 chevy going in my coupe.
     
  12. 49ratfink
    Joined: Feb 8, 2004
    Posts: 18,849

    49ratfink
    Member
    from California

    I always like to see the big olds rears in 60's or earlier style rods.
     
  13. Shaggy
    Joined: Mar 6, 2003
    Posts: 5,207

    Shaggy
    Member
    from Sultan, WA

    Every type of QC would be fine Midget, v-8, and champ
     
  14. Ruiner
    Joined: May 17, 2004
    Posts: 4,141

    Ruiner
    Member

    Save the Olds and Pontiac rears for us drag car guys...throw a '55-'57 Chev rear in it and go cruising...
     
  15. hotrodjeep
    Joined: Feb 3, 2009
    Posts: 867

    hotrodjeep
    Member
    from Tama, Iowa

    I guess I can do that. :):):)

    Jeff
     
  16. sundance
    Joined: Sep 11, 2001
    Posts: 38

    sundance
    Member
    from minnesota

    i run a 55-57 in my 32 chev sedan and it fits nice with 8" rims and 255/70/15 tires--the rearends are interchangable but i believe the axle brg on the '57 is different than the 55/56 and both are a bit expensive,and do go out
     
  17. Ruiner
    Joined: May 17, 2004
    Posts: 4,141

    Ruiner
    Member

    Hell, I even got a '57 housing, axles, backing plates and drums I could sell ya to start you off...get a center section, brakes, bearings and seals and you're done...I was saving it to build a replica of the car in my avatar, but if you need it I can let it go...
     
  18. what about a 55 ford truck? i just got a complete rear hub to hub given to me.. are they any good.. i was told it had 3.23 gears in it..
     
  19. hotrodjeep
    Joined: Feb 3, 2009
    Posts: 867

    hotrodjeep
    Member
    from Tama, Iowa

    On my last trip to the yard I found a few that might work.
    Any truck rear will be easier to get a hold of, but I do know quite a few 55-6-7 Chevy
    guys I could get a complete setup from.

    Anyway here's some pics of a few of the choices I've got at the junkyard:

    Anybody have a guess at what the last one is?

    Jeff

    I also have a rear + TT/drive shaft from a 64 Rambler, if I wanted to
    retain the TT look.
     

    Attached Files:

  20. hotrodjeep
    Joined: Feb 3, 2009
    Posts: 867

    hotrodjeep
    Member
    from Tama, Iowa


    Thanks for the advice, I'l probly be running a 16x4 original Ford W/T combo.
    I haven't nailed down my W/T combo for sure,
    But at least I know the rear should fit with out narrowing.

    How did you mount the rear?

    Thanks Jeff
     
  21. fuel pump
    Joined: Nov 4, 2001
    Posts: 3,620

    fuel pump
    Member Emeritus
    from Caro,MI


    That's why I chose the 9".
    [​IMG]
     
  22. landseaandair
    Joined: Feb 23, 2009
    Posts: 4,485

    landseaandair
    Member
    from phoenix

    If it's cheap I'd grab the 58 Ford rear even if you don't need it. They are one of the narrowest 9" rears and their getting hard to find these days. It might be two narrow for you though depending on whether you are building a highboy or a channelled car. The last rear end looks like a Buick and is not very desirable.
     
  23. hotrodjeep
    Joined: Feb 3, 2009
    Posts: 867

    hotrodjeep
    Member
    from Tama, Iowa

    Even though I'd like to try somthing different than a 9" I can't turn my
    back on cheep parts. I my just have to follow the crowd on this one.

    I'll take my tape measure and checkbook next time I'm up there.

    Would this '58 still have the 5 on 5.5 bp?

    Thanks Jeff
     
  24. hotrodjeep
    Joined: Feb 3, 2009
    Posts: 867

    hotrodjeep
    Member
    from Tama, Iowa

    That sure is a nice setup. What year 9" did tou use?
     
  25. DE SOTO
    Joined: Jan 20, 2006
    Posts: 3,857

    DE SOTO
    Member


    Jeff,
    Since your not running High Horsepower & your are going with F-100 brakes i think i would try to get a rear with the 5 on 5.5 bolt pattern like the front.

    '42-'47 Open Drive Banjo Ford Truck would be cool, Also '50s Chrysler Imperials had an 8 3/4 with 5 on 5.5 bolt pattern.

    You can also look at International products, Early Ford Trucks & Jeep Trucks .. They have the Dana 44 and any 4x4 shop has replacment gears.

    You can also change bolt patterns if that matters to you or run mis-matched bolt patterns... Thats kinda a Voo Doo with me, I like MATCHED bolt patterns.

    In your pics the Early Pontiac Rear will be plenty strong, Also if you can get the 9" out of the '58 Ford CHEEP you can re-sell it for good $$ to put back into your Rod. FORGET that Buick Rear & the Rambler rear you speak of.

    What other old cars are at that yard ? Any Cool Old Engines ?
     
  26. 49ratfink
    Joined: Feb 8, 2004
    Posts: 18,849

    49ratfink
    Member
    from California

    I thought the open drive banjo's were 48 truck only??? could be wrong though... I was wrong once before.
     
  27. DE SOTO
    Joined: Jan 20, 2006
    Posts: 3,857

    DE SOTO
    Member

    '48 was the first year of F-1 ... No open drive Banjo i am aware of in '48.

    I have had 2 Open Drives, One come from a '46 Truck & one had '42 truck shocks attached.
     
  28. fuel pump
    Joined: Nov 4, 2001
    Posts: 3,620

    fuel pump
    Member Emeritus
    from Caro,MI

    Actually its a Currie 9" but i don't know what year they modeled theirs from. Here is a little better picture:
    [​IMG]
     
  29. spiffy1937
    Joined: Apr 9, 2006
    Posts: 733

    spiffy1937
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Florida

    What width rear end did you get from Currie--overall width?

     
  30. hotrodjeep
    Joined: Feb 3, 2009
    Posts: 867

    hotrodjeep
    Member
    from Tama, Iowa

    Your right I'd like to keep it all 5x5.5, I seem to have started collecting
    quite a few 5x5.5 wheels and I gotta use them some where.

    I've definatly got Jeep parts !!!!!
    I'll be running a Jeep motor and Trans. in the A anyway.

    The yard has alot of older trucks but a few cars here and there
    I posted some pics a couple weeks ago:
    http://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/showthread.php?t=360948
    I'll try and get that 9" just for ease of gear selection, but if not i'll fall
    back on the good old Jeep parts.

    Jeff
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.