Register now to get rid of these ads!

Customs Opinons wanted Yay or Nay?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Toymont, Nov 27, 2016.

?
  1. yay

    92 vote(s)
    69.7%
  2. nay

    40 vote(s)
    30.3%
  1. Toymont
    Joined: Jan 4, 2005
    Posts: 1,381

    Toymont
    Member
    from Montana

    I have a long term low budget 50 Studebaker pickup project. I have most of the parts I need for the project except the original bed I have is pretty beat up and rusted through.
    I have been given a bed used as a trailer from a 60's Studebaker Champ pickup. Studebaker bought the tooling for the Champ beds from Dodge who used them on some 50's fleetside trucks. Studebaker never made fleetsides until the Champs in the 60's.
    I had themoose over on the Photoshop to end all photoshops thread do a rendering of a 50's Stude truck with the Champ fleetside bed. I am kind of on the fence on this. I kind of like it, but love the ones with the fenders.
    What do you think?

    upload_2016-11-27_17-20-17.png
     

    Attached Files:

    LOU WELLS and chevy57dude like this.
  2. Low buck build and a free bed to kick start the project? Full speed ahead!
    IMO, looks very smooth.

    * edit - Blackwalls if ya gotta have radials.*
     
  3. KoolKat-57
    Joined: Feb 22, 2010
    Posts: 3,076

    KoolKat-57
    Member
    from Dublin, OH

    If that were the end result, Home run!
    KK
     
  4. i.rant
    Joined: Nov 23, 2009
    Posts: 4,323

    i.rant
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    1. 1940 Ford

    Square bed on a cab that's has curves everywhere? :confused::eek: IMHO, don't do it.
     

  5. scrap metal 48
    Joined: Sep 6, 2009
    Posts: 6,079

    scrap metal 48
    Member

    I say, "Go for it".. Looks pretty cool...
     
    Late to the Party and JeffB2 like this.
  6. Gman0046
    Joined: Jul 24, 2005
    Posts: 6,256

    Gman0046
    Member

    I like the fleet side better then the fenders.

    Gary
     
    JeffB2 likes this.
  7. wingedexpress
    Joined: Dec 24, 2006
    Posts: 893

    wingedexpress

    looks fine to me
     
    JeffB2 likes this.
  8. The37Kid
    Joined: Apr 30, 2004
    Posts: 30,780

    The37Kid
    Member

    Finally, a cure for the odd fat rear fenders! The back would look cleaner IMO without the chains and maybe a tail light upgrade. Bob
     
    Late to the Party, JeffB2 and Toymont like this.
  9. I like it.
     
    JeffB2 likes this.
  10. Lebowski
    Joined: Aug 21, 2011
    Posts: 1,564

    Lebowski
    BANNED

    I like the original look with the fenders....
     
    WiredSpider likes this.
  11. I'm a Stude truck owner since 1974....why has no one thought of this before ? Go for it....it looks cool.....
     
    JeffB2 likes this.
  12. RRichFox
    Joined: Nov 15, 2016
    Posts: 63

    RRichFox

    I think your photo shop is misleading. The Studes I have seen with the later bed, it sticks out on the sides. It ii to wide for the Stude cab to look good.
     
    Hnstray likes this.
  13. Toymont
    Joined: Jan 4, 2005
    Posts: 1,381

    Toymont
    Member
    from Montana

    He also did one with a smooth gate, no chains

    upload_2016-11-27_17-51-34.png
     

    Attached Files:

    scrap metal 48 and JeffB2 like this.
  14. AVater
    Joined: Dec 9, 2008
    Posts: 3,154

    AVater
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    1. Connecticut HAMB'ers

    Good Catch--Come to think of it, the beds were wider than the Champ cabs too if I am remembering correctly.
     
    Hnstray likes this.
  15. Toymont
    Joined: Jan 4, 2005
    Posts: 1,381

    Toymont
    Member
    from Montana

    Yeah I already think that I may have to narrow the bed by about six inches
     
    Late to the Party likes this.
  16. metalman
    Joined: Dec 30, 2006
    Posts: 3,297

    metalman
    Member

    I think RichFox is right, I think it's too wide for the later Stude, might be really too wide for the earlier cab.
    I built one of these trucks years ago, one of my favorite parts was the bed, I personally dug how it was made. Kinda like a wide bed but narrowed with fenders added, way cooler and more style I feel then the typical narrow bed of the day.
     
  17. Raiman1959
    Joined: May 2, 2014
    Posts: 1,427

    Raiman1959

    I like it....has that ''retro'' look that car manufacturers were trying to accomplish few years ago....from ''this'' picture you posted, it looks nicely done....the bed may need some ''tweaking'' in reality.... A real nice, neat, and tidy setup in my opinion though;)
     
  18. I like it a lot and you are a member of a small band of craftsmen that do exceptional work,you can pull it off. HRP
     
  19. I think it could look great, but it would take more than just narrowing the bed to look "right".
    The body lines still don't line up, rear wheel openings are different than the front, etc.
    There might be a decent stock box up here, I can ask around if you want.
    I have a '56 Stude PU waiting to get built...
     
  20. Hnstray
    Joined: Aug 23, 2009
    Posts: 12,355

    Hnstray
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Quincy, IL

    ^^^^^^^Exactly! If you can 'massage' a fleet side bed to look that good...go for it. But unmodified they fit like a saddle on a sow. :eek:

    Peronally, I much prefer the original Studebaker bed that came with that cab.

    Ray
     
    Last edited: Nov 27, 2016
    Jalopy Joker likes this.
  21. Squablow
    Joined: Apr 26, 2005
    Posts: 17,439

    Squablow
    Member

    Think about a fleetside box that was narrowed to the width of the back of a 50's cab. The rear wheels are going to stick out, or you'll need a very narrow rearend with skinny wheels.

    Do you have original rear fenders? Can you narrow the fleetside box up to cab width and stick the Stude fenders onto it?

    It's a shame you're not closer, there's one of those Stude boxes in a junkyard here (made into a trailer like your donor box) that I'm sure could be had really cheap.
     
  22. partsdawg
    Joined: Feb 12, 2006
    Posts: 3,512

    partsdawg
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Minnesota

    Ford Ranger boxes have been used and don't look out of place. Just a option. I do like the look of the Champ box
     
  23. Toymont
    Joined: Jan 4, 2005
    Posts: 1,381

    Toymont
    Member
    from Montana

    I do have some original fenders, I also know a guy that has a trailer made out of the bed I need. I just don't have the cash he wants for it right now. Since I am getting this one for free I thought I would explore the option of using it. Nice thing about photoshop is you can do that.
     
  24. Toymont
    Joined: Jan 4, 2005
    Posts: 1,381

    Toymont
    Member
    from Montana

    I have also seen the newer model GM stepside boxes used, but don't care for them much
     
  25. nope....it'd be like putting a cardboard box-skirt on a topless Marilyn Monroe..
     
    young'n'poor likes this.
  26. Moriarity
    Joined: Apr 11, 2001
    Posts: 31,147

    Moriarity
    SUPER MODERATOR
    Staff Member

    I like it with the fleetside bed. remember the chevy cameos? they were the "fancy" trucks at a time when the "plain" trucks had fenders... go for it
     
    young'n'poor likes this.
  27. belair
    Joined: Jul 10, 2006
    Posts: 9,015

    belair
    Member

    I like the look. But can the real world live up to Photoshop?
     
  28. IMG_0696.JPG

    Build a cool flat bed for it and call it done. I'd love to have something like this.

    Hit Home Depot on Saturday morning and the cruise in on Saturday night.
     
    i.rant likes this.
  29. Hotrodmyk
    Joined: Jan 7, 2011
    Posts: 2,307

    Hotrodmyk
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    1. Northwest HAMBers

    First of all, it's YOUR truck. My opinion, HELL YES!
     
  30. All it would take for me to try is someone else saying I might not be able to do it. ("Winking emoji" I can't figure out how to do emojis on iphone, so just imagine one)
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.