Register now to get rid of these ads!

OPINION: Cool Motors for a Shoebox (Besides A Flatty)

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by SlowandLow63, Oct 28, 2004.

  1. SlowandLow63
    Joined: Sep 18, 2004
    Posts: 5,958

    SlowandLow63
    Member
    from Central NJ

    What do you guys think?? Lets here some opinions and see some pics...
     
  2. 51Cards
    Joined: Oct 12, 2004
    Posts: 242

    51Cards
    Member

    Olds Rocket
    Buick Nailhead
    427 side oiler
    A Hemi the list goes on and on.
     
  3. Fraz
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 1,818

    Fraz
    Member
    from Dixon, MO

    Nailhead
    early Cad
    Rocket
     
  4. Slide
    Joined: May 11, 2004
    Posts: 3,021

    Slide
    Member

    If I was building a shoebox ford, here's my choices:

    1. Early Caddy (extra points for multi-carbs! [​IMG])
    2. Y-Block (extra points for Thunderchicken valve covers!)
    3. Early Caddy
    4. Nailhead
    5. Olds Rocket
    6. Early Caddy
    7. Early SBC (Did I just SAY that?)
    8. Early Caddy
     

  5. Church
    Joined: Nov 15, 2002
    Posts: 2,839

    Church
    Member
    from South Bay

    Olds Rocket.
     
  6. Flexicoker
    Joined: Apr 17, 2004
    Posts: 1,416

    Flexicoker
    Member

    Tunnel ram 350 crate motor, all the billet doo-dads you can find!! [​IMG]



    Actually I vote for an FE, with Thunderbird valve covers!!

    One o' these
    [​IMG]
     
  7. krooser
    Joined: Jul 25, 2004
    Posts: 4,584

    krooser
    Member

    Anything but a SBC! I'd vote for the FE myself...
     
  8. Gotgas
    Joined: Jul 22, 2004
    Posts: 7,178

    Gotgas
    Member
    from DFW USA

    W-motor Chevy
    early Hemi

    inline 6 [​IMG]
     
  9. hatch
    Joined: Nov 20, 2001
    Posts: 3,667

    hatch
    Member
    from house

    Cummins diesel...with a split shift... [​IMG]
     
  10. MichaelDorman
    Joined: Apr 27, 2001
    Posts: 849

    MichaelDorman
    Member

    Y-block
    FE
    Olds Rocket
    Early Caddy
    Nailhead

    Bonus points on all for multiple carbs or esoteric injection systems
     
  11. Flexicoker
    Joined: Apr 17, 2004
    Posts: 1,416

    Flexicoker
    Member

  12. Jonnyhotrod
    Joined: Jul 27, 2003
    Posts: 430

    Jonnyhotrod
    Member

    I'll cast a vote for a multi-carbed Y-Block or Early Caddy.

    Jonny
     
  13. MEL motor!!!!!! It will also lower the front end [​IMG]
     
  14. Fat Hack
    Joined: Nov 30, 2002
    Posts: 7,709

    Fat Hack
    Member
    from Detroit

    1. Y-block Ford
    2. FE Ford
    3. 250-292 straight six Chevy
    4. 394 Olds
    5. Early Poncho V8
    6. Early Cad
    7. Nailhead

     
  15. SlowandLow63
    Joined: Sep 18, 2004
    Posts: 5,958

    SlowandLow63
    Member
    from Central NJ

    well i have 2 in mine for when i build mine have a 351w sittin at home and i was really thinkin of a y-block w/ tripower

    anhting else keep em comin
     
  16. [ QUOTE ]
    Anything but a SBC!

    [/ QUOTE ]


    What he said...... [​IMG]
     
  17. Olds(49-56)
    Cadillac(49-56)
    Chrysler(51-56)
     
  18. CHOPMERC
    Joined: May 11, 2001
    Posts: 992

    CHOPMERC
    Member

    hey billy, i think you should run a mazda rotary engine and use those dope hubcaps you won [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]......bob
     
  19. Brad54
    Joined: Apr 15, 2004
    Posts: 6,021

    Brad54
    Member
    from Atl Ga

    There's a set of conversion motor mounts for 49-51 Ford and Mercury to Buick Nailhead on ebay right now. I just saw them tonight. Search "Buick Nailhead" and they'll show up on the list.
    I didn't really read about them, so I can't say anything about their quality or whatever, but check them out. Might make your decision a bit easier.
    Otherwise, 302 Ford with finned valve covers, roller cam, shorty headers and call it done.
    -brad
     
  20. C. Montgomery
    Joined: Dec 18, 2003
    Posts: 1,010

    C. Montgomery
    Member

    gonna eventually put a 292 y block in mine with a 6x2 u fab intake.....
     
  21. Zor
    Joined: Aug 4, 2003
    Posts: 287

    Zor
    Member
    from Phoenix

    i plan on putting a 331 caddy motor in mine with multiple carbs, i think weiand mad a four two barrel set up.
     
  22. SlowandLow63
    Joined: Sep 18, 2004
    Posts: 5,958

    SlowandLow63
    Member
    from Central NJ

    [ QUOTE ]
    hey billy, i think you should run a mazda rotary engine and use those dope hubcaps you won [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]......bob

    [/ QUOTE ]

    bobby why cant u understand it was a joke jeez am i ever gonna live that one downa anyway i think im gonna go w/ a y-block 292 or 312 with an original tri power setup think that might be real cool but keep em comin the more i hear the more times i change my decision
     
  23. 57JoeFoMoPar
    Joined: Sep 14, 2004
    Posts: 6,149

    57JoeFoMoPar
    Member

    Are you retarded? Y block? no thanks. The only good thing I have to say about Y blocks is that the radiator is basically there for show. The cylinder walls rival an armored bunker in thickness. A caddy mill is cool as hell, but costs way too much for your/my budget. I'd personally stay away from a Ford product unless it's a 289 or a 302, which I don't think is very cool in a shoebox. My vote: Nailhead, early SBC (283,327 though nobody would know the difference), Mopar(SB or B/RB) or a 472/500 Caddy.

    Dual quads are in order for any of those, except for the caddy, which will run like a raped ape with a single 4

    I say go GM because then you can just swing a TH350 or a TH400 behind it and make your life easy

    my $.02
     
  24. RocketDaemon
    Joined: Jul 4, 2001
    Posts: 2,082

    RocketDaemon
    Member
    from Sweden

    289 studebaker avanti engine with manual trans and mcculloch supercharger

     
  25. Poncho power
     
  26. If I had a shoebox with a good running flatmotor I'd make sure I had a good radiator, do a little painting and touchup, maybe two 94's up top and that would be it.

    If you're building a back-in-the-day style shoebox then your question has been answered.

    Why not mix back-in-the-day styling and run a modern motor so you'd have a good parts supply?

    Interesting part about a question like yours is that it allows us all to come on board with our wish list.

    So here's mine - SVO 514" billet head motor with automatic - or maybe a top loader - good driveline stuff, killer ignition, quiet muffs.
    Stock or even a mildly customized shoebox with a powertrain as above would make for a nice sleeper.

    For a budget build, a 460 Ford with auto would be a good choice.
    Not much required here, moderate cam, maybe headers, mild ignition upgrade, 9/1 or so CR, good street/strip compromise on diff gearing, decent set of rear tires (Radial slicks?) would have you running high 11's low 12's at the strip.

    If you're just gonna cruise I'd spring for one of the 87 & up Ford 302's found in the Mustangs.
    Auto or better yet, stick.
    Running a well-selected carb and the right diff would get you good mileage with good performance.

    Since Ford ran a six in the shoeboxes it should be easy to gain the room required for the longish 302 without cutting the firewall.

    The Mustangs of this era had excellent performance with box stock ones running 14 second ET's and the slowest top end I ever read about with the Mustangs was 145 mph.
    Not too shabby in anybody's book.

    Gas mileage with the electronic fuel injection Mustangs - stock ones - runs 24.5 - 25.5 on the highways (least that's what mine got) and combined town/highway mileage ran right about 20 mpg.

    The really nice part about the 302's is that parts for them are everywhere. An important consideration with the long-range driving most of us do nowadays. [​IMG]
     
  27. Cycle Jock
    Joined: Oct 20, 2004
    Posts: 418

    Cycle Jock
    Member

    [ QUOTE ]
    [​IMG]

    [/ QUOTE ]
    this one is equipped with a back up in case of break down
     
  28. swazzie
    Joined: Mar 30, 2004
    Posts: 940

    swazzie
    Member

    [ QUOTE ]
    Cummins diesel...with a split shift... [​IMG]

    [/ QUOTE ]

    BASTARD , i spit coffee all over my computer . loL . swaZZie
     
  29. Henry Floored
    Joined: Sep 18, 2004
    Posts: 1,370

    Henry Floored
    Member

    [ QUOTE ]
    Are you retarded? Y block? no thanks. The only good thing I have to say about Y blocks is that the radiator is basically there for show. The cylinder walls rival an armored bunker in thickness. A caddy mill is cool as hell, but costs way too much for your/my budget. I'd personally stay away from a Ford product unless it's a 289 or a 302, which I don't think is very cool in a shoebox. My vote: Nailhead, early SBC (283,327 though nobody would know the difference), Mopar(SB or B/RB) or a 472/500 Caddy.

    Dual quads are in order for any of those, except for the caddy, which will run like a raped ape with a single 4

    I say go GM because then you can just swing a TH350 or a TH400 behind it and make your life easy

    my $.02

    [/ QUOTE ]


    Anything but Ford power right? Riiiigghht!
     
  30. Henry Floored
    Joined: Sep 18, 2004
    Posts: 1,370

    Henry Floored
    Member

    The most practical non-Flatty engine for a shoebox would be a later small block Ford roller cam engine. Run a late F-150 oil pan and pick-up and you'll clear the crossmember AND the drag link. These things are cheap run cool and you get good performance from them as they are. If you want you can get sick levels of horsepower with all that's available today.

    My opinion for bang for buck combo..... `87- `91 5.0 with factory forged pistons, E303 cam, home ported stock heads, Performer RPM or Victor Jr. with 4 barrel, T5 5spd or top loader 4 spd. If you want the traditional look go for early steel or finned aluminum valvecovers, Joe Hunt magneto, and a "slingshot" Y to four barrel adapter that mounts two 3- bolt carbs from Vintage Speed.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.