Background: local NC DMV comes out to inspect vehicle over a month ago...took pics to send up to Raleigh DMV. NC comes back and says I need a state VIN since the VIN plate on the car wasnt correct but the number was good. The inspector calls tells me I need a VIN, but no bond. Last week they show up to put the so called VIN on my '29 (which turns out to be a hideous sticker) and then tells me I need a bond. The car had a clear california title, numbers matching the VIN plate, and all appropriate paperwork. I thought bonds were for vehicles with no title or title that doesnt match. Now that Ive been told two different ways from the same inspector....who would I turn to besides the local retarded office,or are they correct? Why do I have to put a bond down if they said i didnt need on cause the title was good, but just needed a VIN?