Register now to get rid of these ads!

My wife's new '51 chevy & TECH QUESTIONS!

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Ryan, Oct 11, 2003.

  1. Ryan
    Joined: Jan 2, 1995
    Posts: 21,633

    Ryan
    ADMINISTRATOR
    Staff Member

    Went to St. Louis to pick up my wife's new '51. It isn't nearly as nice as looks in the images, but it was cheap and I think I did ok.

    [​IMG]

    My first job is to do the wheels/tires and stance. Plans are to get about 4" lower out back and 3" lower up front - all over black steel wheels wrapped in white walls... The front is easy, but I can't figure the rear. The builder located the rear springs on the axle is an odd manner. Check it:

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Ever seen anything like that??? Is that a late model setup of some kind? I have no idea what the rear is out of.

    And finally... The car has a 350/350 setup that runs great. I even got around 24mpg on the way home from St. Louis... I mean this thing cruises... The only thing is, it has a really rough idle when the car is in drive (rattles the shit out of the interior of the car)... Put it in neutral or park and it's fine. I've never had an automatic before and am not totally sure what is going on here... Any more ideas???
     
  2. Nice! Glad she got it. I agree that rear is late model. Wunder if it is Camaro/Firebird???? I have seen it, not sure where. So, will Marci let me ride in it? [​IMG]

     
  3. That appears to be a late seventies/early eighties Camaro/Firebird rear axle. You can use regular lowering blocks and U-bolts.

    It is interesting that it looks as if the bolts are loose. There are suposed to be rubber spring isolators between the axle and the spring and the lower spring plate and the spring.
     
  4. Flat Ernie
    Joined: Jun 5, 2002
    Posts: 8,406

    Flat Ernie
    Tech Editor

    For the crummy idle in drive, check for vacuum leaks. They can drive you mad. One of the first things I'd check.

    Looks good!
    [​IMG]
     

  5. colorado51
    Joined: Feb 24, 2003
    Posts: 1,576

    colorado51
    Member

    Looks nice!

    The rear looks like a 70-81 Camaro/Firebird, those rears were pretty much a direct bolt in on the 49-54 Chevys. For my 51, I made lowering blocks with a 4 degree angle to take care of the problem that you see in your pic.

    If you want, I can send you pics of the way it looks in my 51.
     
  6. Ryan
    Joined: Jan 2, 1995
    Posts: 21,633

    Ryan
    ADMINISTRATOR
    Staff Member

    Colorado, please send pics!!! Thanks man!
     
  7. Rocket88
    Joined: Jul 11, 2001
    Posts: 912

    Rocket88
    Member

    The outside looks great! As for the the rear end set up,well...yuck! All it needs is some new lowering blocks. Don't forget that the rear end will have to sit back about an inch and a half from the spring bolt that holds the leaf's together.That should compensate for that stock pivot deal they had in them for the torque tube.
    As for the rough idle in gear, sounds like the converter is too tight!
     
  8. carkiller
    Joined: Jun 12, 2002
    Posts: 849

    carkiller
    Member

    I have a near new set of dropped spindels, and brake componetes for sale. Cal
     
  9. Roothawg
    Joined: Mar 14, 2001
    Posts: 24,524

    Roothawg
    Member

    I have one of those in the garage. Mine was out of a 79 Camaro. Do most guys use those old saddles? I was planning on hacking mine. The springs are wider too. The stock Chevies were 1-3/4" wide. I think the Camaros were around 2".
     
  10. Roothawg
    Joined: Mar 14, 2001
    Posts: 24,524

    Roothawg
    Member

    Cal, how much if Ryan isn't interested?
     
  11. Donzie
    Joined: Aug 9, 2001
    Posts: 2,779

    Donzie
    Member

    Looks like ya did all right. I know you've been looking for a while. Is she happy? [​IMG]
     
  12. Roothawg
    Joined: Mar 14, 2001
    Posts: 24,524

    Roothawg
    Member

    Ryan, ya might have a broken flexplate.
     
  13. Hubbcat
    Joined: Oct 15, 2002
    Posts: 561

    Hubbcat
    Member
    from Sweden

    Go out and check the idle adjust,go a litle richer.
     
  14. carkiller
    Joined: Jun 12, 2002
    Posts: 849

    carkiller
    Member

    Not ta jump Ryans post, Dropped spindels and all near new brake components, down ta the lug studs. (sindels, spindel knuckles, bushings, pins,bell crank, backing plates, new w/cyls, brakes and new hardware, bearings, seals, turned drums, new lug studs) Came off a six month old fresh rod. Going to mustang11. NOT Mine, Customers car. Shipped $400.00. Cal
     
  15. That looks Reet man-ya can almost always buy a little car at that stage for less than it can be built for -hope she enjoys it!Does it have good electric wipers or the ol Vacuum weezers?gotta have a good defroster and wipers!!!!its a wimmen car! [​IMG]
     
  16. Ryan
    Joined: Jan 2, 1995
    Posts: 21,633

    Ryan
    ADMINISTRATOR
    Staff Member

    I tried the idle... The thing is, the motor sounds fine at idle. I'm thinking maybe the converter is too tight too - what does that mean and how do I loosen it?


    And yeah, I woke up this morning to an empty house as my old lady is out driving her car... That's so cute.
     
  17. Deuce Roadster
    Joined: Sep 8, 2002
    Posts: 9,519

    Deuce Roadster
    Member Emeritus

    [ QUOTE ]
    I tried the idle... The thing is, the motor sounds fine at idle. I'm thinking maybe the converter is too tight too - what does that mean and how do I loosen it?


    [/ QUOTE ]

    Converters are "sized" to the weight of the vehicle. A Electra 225 will have a tighter one than say a Buick Skylark.

    I suggest a aftermarket one.
    Just like camshafts.....contact the manufacter of your choice and LISTEN to his recommendations.



    [​IMG]
     
  18. Fat Hack
    Joined: Nov 30, 2002
    Posts: 7,709

    Fat Hack
    Member
    from Detroit

    Those rear spring to axle mounts look like 75-79 Nova units, but I can't be sure from the photo. 10 Bolt axle???

    As for the rattling at idle, I think it's probably more of an NVH issue than a state-of-tune problem. The harmonics are being transfered through the chassis to the interior and making things vibrate. A change in motor mount design/materials could help out. (This is a common condition in cars with motor plates or solid mounts). What type of motor mounts and tranny mount is being used? Any rubber isolators in the design?

    Sometimes the "fix" is as easy as adjusting the idle up or down slightly. Does it really push against the brake at an idle in gear? If so, try setting the idle lower.

    Also look for contact in the exhaust manifold or pipes area. Some swaps position things pretty tight, and I've seen a few where there was slight contact between the exhaust manifold and part of the chassis at certain rpm levels or driving conditions...making an AWFULL NVH nightmare inside the car!

    (NVH = Noise, Vibration, Harshness...engineers tackle these problems with new car designs)

    Look for the any part of the motor or tranny, or exhaust system making contact with anything but the mounts. A dipstick hitting the steering shaft can transfer vibration, as well as some mechanical throttle linkage designs.

    Look for "witness marks" in areas where motor/tranny fit is tight. You may find your problem in one of those locations.

    Check out how the exhaust system is suspended from the chassis or body, too. Having the pipes mouted solidly to the frame or body with no rubber insulators can drive ya buggy, too.

    (By the way, the car looks GREAT in the photos, and I like the wheels on it now!!)

     
  19. Hubbcat
    Joined: Oct 15, 2002
    Posts: 561

    Hubbcat
    Member
    from Sweden

    I had the exact same problem with my 51,when i replaced the motor with a new one a litle hotter,it run great until i hit it in drive it just died or stumled.i have a stock converter and hot camshaft and they dont realy match.
    So go out(again)and check the vacum,my´n was a litle poor(co´s the cam)so i´d richen the idle as much a could she´s fine now.
     
  20. BigJim394
    Joined: Jan 21, 2002
    Posts: 767

    BigJim394
    Member

    Lets lighten up those pix a bit so everyone can see what is going on:


    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  21. Skate Fink
    Joined: Jul 31, 2001
    Posts: 3,472

    Skate Fink
    Member Emeritus

    [ QUOTE ]


    (NVH = Noise, Vibration, Harshness...engineers tackle these problems with new car designs)



    [/ QUOTE ]

    Damn Hack......you're smart AS WELL as talented?? [​IMG]
     
  22. Fat Hack
    Joined: Nov 30, 2002
    Posts: 7,709

    Fat Hack
    Member
    from Detroit

    Good job with the pics, BigJim!

    Upon closer inspection, I don't think those are Nova spring mounts. They look like some backwoods copy of them, though! I'd want to re-do the spring-to-axle connection if it were me. Looks like it incorporates a wedge block to modify pinion angle. Pinion angle can create strange harmonics within the car, too...you may want to take a really close look at the relationship between the tailshaft angle on the tranny and the pinion angle. You may need to make some minor changes.

    Nothing WRONG with what ya got there...but I think factory Camaro or Nova spring/shock mounts along with new U-bolts out back might work out a little better for ya. Try to check out the driveshaft angle and see if anything looks odd there.

    All simple things that come with buying someone ELSE'S engine swap. Most people tackle the "hard part", then skimp on the details. That's where the new owner takes over!

    Still a cool looking car well worth a few hours and bucks spent sorting out the few minor quirks!!! Good score!!



     
  23. Fat Hack
    Joined: Nov 30, 2002
    Posts: 7,709

    Fat Hack
    Member
    from Detroit

    Shhhh, Skate Fink...it's a SECRET!! [​IMG] [​IMG]

     
  24. Flat Ernie
    Joined: Jun 5, 2002
    Posts: 8,406

    Flat Ernie
    Tech Editor

    I still say vacuum leak...

    [​IMG]
     
  25. Good lookin hardtop. Ryan...
    I'd cut all that factory camaro/nova mount shit loose from the rear axle housing and ash-can it. I did 'zactly that when I was buidling my 50 sdean delivery. I made new mounts with a 4" drop built into them. I welded up blocks with a "C" cut into the top of 'em to go against the axle tubes. Loosely bolted the rear end into the car with long U-bolts and moved pinion up and down until I had my correct pinion angle. Spot welded the "Blocks" to the axle tubes and finish welded after double checking angles and placement.
    I made my lowering blocks longer at the bottom [prolly 6 inches long] to take into consideration the fact you will be drilling the spring bolt hole [locator hole] an inch and a half forward of rear axle centerline.. I reused the old 50 chevy bottom spring plates with their lower shock mounts.
    This worked wonderful for me and I punished it with a 406 SBC and a 4 speed. One thing I might suggest is revised upper shock mounts while you're under there. The original 51 chevy upper shock mounts were in the trunk floor and are guaranteed to fatigue the metal and crack out in time. I made a upper shockmount crossmember from thick wall 1.5" square tubing and welded it between the frame rails....welded it directly to the inner rails. I welded shockmount tabs to the new crossmember before installing it. I learned to do this after my rear floor broke out with the shock still attached to it. Made a helluva racket!
    Carkiller's dropped spindles with a cut coil would be the safest/easiest way to handle the front. I've seen his parts and the original brakes are all brand new stuff! The previous owner changed his car to mustang II parts......
    Don't forget to update the steering gearbox to a 53 or 54 chevy box. That will make the car about 473 times nicer to drive because the 49-52 gearbox had phoney-baloney bronze/brass bushings and the 53-54 box had all roller bearings. Keeps the damn car from wandering all over the road. I found this out the hard way too! I believe the steering shaft/column length is the same as 49-52 but not entirely sure as I cut mine down to use a mid 70's-80's chevy van column with a rag joint...worked slick and allowed me to use modern turn signals and the old nova wiring harnes I had, without splicing wiring. I'm soooooo lazy...and cheap!
    I made these changes in mine over a 3 year time span, making the car pleasant to drive for the guy I sold it to. Most of the time I spent with the car were with sheer terror of busted shocks and weaving steering...
     
  26. Ron
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 1,225

    Ron
    Member

    Those look like the stock Nova saddles with some homemade or 51 lower plates but kinda hard to tell. If you use the the Nova saddles and lower plates the lower plates can bend up around the springs(if you look at them from the end they look like a ( instead of flat). Like aready said the stock springs are 1 3/4 inches wide and the Nova saddles and springs are wider.
    I used to get the narrow saddle Butch's and use the stock 49/52 lower plates, but they real hard to get anything from anymore. Just cut and ground off the Nova stuff, set the rear up there where I wanted it, used an angle finder to set the pinion angle, welded the new saddles to the rear end(may be easier to take the rear back out to weld). I just usde the narrow saddles and made my own lowering blocks. Cause I'm cheap and the saddles were only 20 bux.

    Measure your springs if they are the stock springs 1 3/4 inches wide try these

    http://stoveboltengineco.com/catalog/60-4503.htm

    http://stoveboltengineco.com/catalog/60-4510.htm

    http://stoveboltengineco.com/catalog/60-4505.htm

    I have never tried these but looks like what you need. It would help if they had pix in the catalog. Give them a call they are real nice and helpful. And ask them if their's make up for locater pin location. Because I think someone already said on those cars the locater pin in the spring is about 1 1/2 inhes forward. With a later rear that will move the wheels to far forward in the wheelwells. The saddles I got from Butch's already had both sets of holes. I would think Stovebolts would have the holes where you need but ask.

    If you go to low in the rear you will have to c the frame, make room for the rearend in the trunk floor, and driveshaft tunnel. But that is easy to do as well.

    I am looking at getting a 52 with a 235 this week. But it is not nearly that nice.
     
  27. fatassbuick
    Joined: Jul 6, 2001
    Posts: 989

    fatassbuick
    Member

    Why are ya gonna lower it? I guess I'm out of touch, but I think it looks damned good how it sits now.
     
  28. Ryan- it may be tourqing over in drive and contacting exhaust or drivetrain against something solid ,causing your noise.....
     
  29. Boones
    Joined: Mar 4, 2001
    Posts: 9,691

    Boones
    Member
    from Kent, Wa
    1. Northwest HAMBers

    Ryan, the car looks nice, So you just could stand not being a 'Rockstar with a Torque'....

    I would cut the mounts off the rear end and weld new ones on it so you can reset the pinion angle when you lower it ( The shock mount looks home made and just a copy of some of the later model Chevy products (S-10 rear shocks mount off the lower U-bolt perch in a similair manner (but cleaner) - you may want to use a set if you want to keep the shock in the same location

    If you are not going to rearch the springs, then get a set of lowering blocks, weld on new perches and let her at it (assuming you can get her out of it now...)

     
  30. Ryan
    Joined: Jan 2, 1995
    Posts: 21,633

    Ryan
    ADMINISTRATOR
    Staff Member

    Well, you "NVH" guys were right. Turns out the OE style manifolds are right up against the pitman arm off the steering box and the drivers side motor mount is loose. There is some evidence that this problem has been messed with before, but I think they were too budget minded to find some less space hogging manifolds. Who makes really tight fitting exhaust manifolds for SBC now days?

    As for the rear, I think I'm gonna cut everything off and start over.

    You guys rock.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.