Register now to get rid of these ads!

Projects Mid Life Crisis 62 Vette

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by squirrel, May 12, 2023.

  1. lumpy 63
    Joined: Aug 2, 2010
    Posts: 2,604

    lumpy 63
    Member

    Jim and I discussed steering wheels , he will be able to drive with a stock wheel as he is much more svelt than I:p I on the other hand require a smaller wheel...And getting in with the top on requires its own special move and I'm 5'10"
     
    Budget36, scotty t, alanp561 and 5 others like this.
  2. 427 sleeper
    Joined: Mar 8, 2017
    Posts: 2,890

    427 sleeper
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I get it! Getting in a '56 Belair hard top requires the same special move when you're 6'1"! LOL!!!
     
  3. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 19,243

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    I've heard more than once that the 68's were a problem year, yes, no?
     
    Deuces and scotty t like this.
  4. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 56,043

    squirrel
    Member

    We made it home....time to unwind and get to know my new mill and gearbox.

    I did hang the clutch pedal in the car just to make it look like it should....


    clutch.jpg
     
    mrspeedyt, Torkwrench, brEad and 21 others like this.
  5. theHIGHLANDER
    Joined: Jun 3, 2005
    Posts: 10,259

    theHIGHLANDER
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Yes, electrics were funky.
     
  6. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 56,043

    squirrel
    Member

    But 62s were all thoroughly ironed out, they're great cars!
     
  7. theHIGHLANDER
    Joined: Jun 3, 2005
    Posts: 10,259

    theHIGHLANDER
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I've expressed why, and don't ever think it reduces my respect for this hangout. This life didn't magically stop mid 60s. In fact for ½ a decade it made an impact on one of the world's biggest industries. But it is what it is (fuck I hate that cliche) so I'm glad we enjoy it.
     
    VANDENPLAS, Deuces, alanp561 and 2 others like this.
  8. 41 GMC K-18
    Joined: Jun 27, 2019
    Posts: 3,635

    41 GMC K-18
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    It's cool watching the progress, of this pile of puzzle pieces, come together.
     
  9. enloe
    Joined: May 10, 2006
    Posts: 9,537

    enloe
    Member
    from east , tn.

    For some reason when I read the I could hear Rolling Stone’s music.
     
  10. Everything gm made in 68 was an odd ball of sorts. Lots of one year only parts. Other than that they’re just regular old crappy chevies
     
    enloe likes this.
  11. Lead with your head and right leg, fold yourself up like a pocket knife while standing on your left leg then twist and fall into the seat. Stop and take breath then drag your left leg in. Oh yeah get the keys out of your pocket first:p
     
    Tman, Thor1, Irish Mike and 11 others like this.
  12. Johnny Gee
    Joined: Dec 3, 2009
    Posts: 12,666

    Johnny Gee
    Member
    from Downey, Ca

    Visions of John Cleese come to mind.
     
  13. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 56,043

    squirrel
    Member

    good thing I don't have a hardtop!

    I've been looking over my new transmission (thanks Colin!) looks like an early M20, probably 64-65 vintage. The synchro teeth are not chipped much, and it has what looks like the original lock tabs on the front bearing retainer bolts. It was assembled March 20th of whichever year it was, and the tail and side cover dates match. There's no VIN stamp on it, which is what I would expect, as they didn't do that much except on Corvettes back then.

    trans01.jpg trans02.jpg trans04.jpg

    I also got out a flywheel that I got recently, I'm not sure who made it, but it appears not to be made by Chevy because there are no casting numbers on it, and it has a different look to the front side, with the scallops around it. At some point it was on a 427, judging by the faint writing. And it's dual bolt pattern, so I can use a smaller pressure plate. It appears to have had a 10.4" disc on it, with the larger bolt pattern being used.

    flywheel01.jpg flywheel02.jpg
    I also got my new windshield in the mail while I was gone, I need to finish unwrapping it to make sure it survived. No damage to the box, and it was well packed, so should be ok.

    I also got some wiring, I decided to go with stock repro harnesses because I just like having all those neat old connectors on the car. And the glass fuses.
     
    Torkwrench, brEad, Thor1 and 13 others like this.
  14. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 56,043

    squirrel
    Member

    The engine. Looks like it had been rebuilt before, with .030" pistons and .010 under crank. The block was bored and honed to .040, and includes a new set of cast flat top pistons. I still need to clean it and install cam bearings and freeze plugs and oil plugs. It has the right date and stampings to be in a different 62 low perf Corvette, but one with a 4 speed. The partial VIN is from very late in the production run, July 1962, while my car is early in the production run, Sept 61. Which is interesting, but doesn't make any difference in how it drives, I don't expect.

    engine07.jpg engine01.jpg engine06.jpg

    The heads were done, new valves, springs, and PC seals, along with screw in studs (which I like). The valves sure are small! since they're power pack 1.72 heads.

    engine02.jpg

    Crank was polished, still .010" under. No tapped damper bolt hole in the early 327s apparently!

    engine08.jpg
    engine04.jpg

    I think I want some new rod bolts, and resize the big ends.

    engine03.jpg
     
  15. rumblegutz
    Joined: Aug 29, 2008
    Posts: 662

    rumblegutz
    Member

    Yeah, that block is from a very late car. About 215 from the end of '62 production. Started life as 250 horse with manual trans. FWIW the solid lifter engines were drilled and tapped for a damper bolt.
     
  16. Johnny Gee
    Joined: Dec 3, 2009
    Posts: 12,666

    Johnny Gee
    Member
    from Downey, Ca

    Just came across this photo on another thread. 3898E2A5-0067-4D58-A98A-CB24F6F6068B.png
     
  17. BJR
    Joined: Mar 11, 2005
    Posts: 9,899

    BJR
    Member

    That was me this morning putting a new temp gauge in my 56 T-Bird.:p
    Only I have better looking legs.:eek::D
     
  18. Daddy_O
    Joined: Sep 5, 2007
    Posts: 578

    Daddy_O
    Member

    Looks like an old school Ansen 2 piece scattershield/bell housing behind the crankshaft.
     
    enloe, squirrel and Johnny Gee like this.
  19. Beanscoot
    Joined: May 14, 2008
    Posts: 3,075

    Beanscoot
    Member

    This guy led with his left leg.

    [​IMG]
     
  20. Deuces
    Joined: Nov 3, 2009
    Posts: 23,882

    Deuces

    Yep! The big block cars would overheat in traffic....
     
  21. theHIGHLANDER
    Joined: Jun 3, 2005
    Posts: 10,259

    theHIGHLANDER
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I like em a lot, I wish I could drive one. I'd have to cut it up and move shit around which doesn't bother me but I don't want one bad enough to put in the effort. And boy howdy did they make bitchin M/P drag cars.
     
  22. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 56,043

    squirrel
    Member

    I was looking at the rear end in the Vette. It does not have posi, I was wondering if it was original, as very few of these cars were not equipped with posi. It looks like it is indeed original. The round tag which identifies the ratio is still there, and the housing is stamped with the correct letters/numbers for 3.36 open, and the build date is right. Just gotta love rarity that is not worth anything! Oh well.

    rearend02.jpg rearend01.jpg
     
    Torkwrench, warbird1, brEad and 11 others like this.
  23. Bandit Billy
    Joined: Sep 16, 2014
    Posts: 12,364

    Bandit Billy
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    NCRS guys all be like "there is a disturbance in the force"
     
    Sancho, enloe, scotty t and 3 others like this.
  24. SS327
    Joined: Sep 11, 2017
    Posts: 2,521

    SS327

    Posi rear ends in vettes is not a given until 1975 I believe. Or at least around there.
     
    enloe and scotty t like this.
  25. rumblegutz
    Joined: Aug 29, 2008
    Posts: 662

    rumblegutz
    Member

    Interesting, the cars build date is likely July 25. Yet the dif build date is a month after the build of the car August 25. The CA build prefix is appropriate as Detroit axle open 3:36 installed in a Corvette. The 3:36 ratio tag agrees. There is a casting date on the drivers side face below the tag.
     
    enloe likes this.
  26. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 56,043

    squirrel
    Member

    The car build date is late September 61. The engine number is not the serial number of the car, it's a different engine than came in the car originally.

    I'll probably scrape off the casting numbers eventually. I'll also pull it apart and replace the seal and crush sleeve, and the wheel bearings, and inspect the gears and bearings, especially looking for cracks on the pinion teeth.
     
    Thor1, Sancho, enloe and 2 others like this.
  27. rumblegutz
    Joined: Aug 29, 2008
    Posts: 662

    rumblegutz
    Member

    Ah, now it makes sense. Early car late block. When all else fails read the instructions never assume.
     
    enloe, scotty t and Deuces like this.
  28. s55mercury66
    Joined: Jul 6, 2009
    Posts: 4,344

    s55mercury66
    Member
    from SW Wyoming

    You are probably already aware, but early Camaro and Nova rears fit like a dream, and provide self adjusting brakes at the same time. I installed the self adjusting stuff on the front of a '61 a while back, but that owner was a strictly hands-off guy. That car has a 12 bolt from a '69 Era donor, the remnants of torched-off slapper bars, and leaf springs with kinks in them from the slapper bars at work. It also now has a working tach and fuel gauge, thanks to my astronaut-type gymnastics.
     
    SS327, Deuces, scotty t and 1 other person like this.
  29. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 56,043

    squirrel
    Member

    Finding an early Camaro or Nova rear these days isn't so easy, either! I'll stick with the stocker for now, and probably move to a 60 or Olds if I decided to try to go fast with the car. But yeah, if I had one of those 1960s rears laying around still....
     
  30. lumpy 63
    Joined: Aug 2, 2010
    Posts: 2,604

    lumpy 63
    Member

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.